Just 1% of coastal waters could power a third of the world’s electricity – but can we do it in time?

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Aleh Cherp, Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University

Just 1% of the world’s coastal waters could, in theory, generate enough offshore wind and solar power to provide a third of the world’s electricity by 2050. That’s the promise highlighted in a new study by a team of scientists in Singapore and China, who systematically mapped the global potential of renewables at sea.

But turning that potential into reality is another story. Scaling up offshore renewables fast enough to seriously dent global emissions faces formidable technical, economic and political hurdles.

To reach global climate targets, the world’s electricity systems must be fully decarbonised within a couple of decades if not sooner. Wind and solar power have grown at record-breaking rates, yet further expansion on land is increasingly constrained by a scarcity of good sites and conflicts over land use.

Moving renewables offshore is therefore tempting. The sea is vast, windy and sunny, with few residents around to object. The team behind the new study identified coastal areas with enough wind or sunlight, and water shallower than 200 metres, that are relatively ice-free and within 200 kilometres of population centres.

They estimate that using just 1% of these areas could generate over 6,000 terawatt hours (TWh) of offshore wind power and 14,000TWh of offshore solar power each year. Together that’s roughly one-third of the electricity the world is expected to use in 2050, while avoiding 9 billion tonnes of CO₂ annually.

That sounds impressive as 1% of suitable ocean seems small. Many European countries, such as Denmark, Germany, Belgium and the UK, already allocate between 7% and 16% of their coastal waters for offshore wind farms. Yet what matters for climate mitigation is not only how much low-carbon energy could eventually be produced, but how fast that could happen.

At present, offshore wind generates less than 200TWh per year, less than 1% of global electricity. By 2030, that might rise to around 900TWh. Hitting 6,000TWh by 2050 would require annual installations – each year, for two decades – to be about seven times larger than they were last year.

Offshore solar requires an even steeper climb. The technology is still experimental, producing only negligible amounts of electricity today.

Even if 15TWh a year (an equivalent of some 15GW capacity) can be generated by 2030, to reach the estimated potential of 14,000TWh by 2050 would require sustained annual growth of over 40% for two decades. Such a rate that has never been achieved for any energy technology, not even during the recent record-breaking growth of land solar.

Achieving techno-economic viability

Around 90% of existing offshore wind capacity is located in the shallow, sheltered waters of northwestern Europe and China, where most turbines are directly fixed to the seabed. Yet most of the untapped potential lies in deeper waters, where fixed foundations are impossible.

That means turning to floating turbines, a technology that currently accounts for just 0.3% of global offshore wind capacity. Floating wind power faces serious engineering challenges, from mooring and anchoring, to undersea cabling and maintenance in rougher seas.

It currently costs far more than fixed-bottom systems, and will need substantial subsidies for at least the next decade. Only if early projects prove successful and drive down costs could floating wind become commercially viable.

Solar panels on water
Floating solar on a reservoir in Indonesia.
Algi Febri Sugita / shutterstock

Offshore solar is even further behind. The International Energy Agency rates its technology readiness at only level three to five on an 11-point scale — barely beyond prototype stage. The new study refers to research saying offshore solar could become commercially viable in the Netherlands only around 2040-2050, by which time the world’s power system should already be largely decarbonised.

Overcoming growth barriers

Even when low-carbon technologies become commercially competitive, their growth rarely continues exponentially. Our own research shows manufacturing bottlenecks, logistics and grid integration eventually slow expansion. And these challenges are likely to be even tougher for offshore projects.

Social opposition and the need for permits can also slow progress. Moving wind and solar offshore avoids some land-use conflicts, but it does not eliminate them. Coastal space close to populated areas is already crowded with shipping, fishing, leisure and military activities.

In Europe, approval and construction of offshore wind farms can a decade or more. Permits are not guaranteed: Sweden recently rejected 13 proposed wind farms in the Baltic Sea due to national security concerns.

What is realistic?

Offshore renewables will undoubtedly play an important role in the global energy transition. Offshore wind, in particular, could become a major contributor by mid-century if its growth follows the same trajectory as onshore wind has since the early 2000s.

However, that would require floating turbines to quickly become competitive, and for political commitment to be secured in the Americas, Australia, Russia and other areas with lots of growth potential.

Offshore wind (green) is tracking the growth rate of onshore wind (orange):

graph
Timelines are shifted by 15 years, so that the year 2000 for onshore maps onto year 2015 for offshore.
Aleh Cherp (Data: IEA, Wen et al)

Offshore solar, by contrast, would need to achieve viability and then grow at an unprecedented rate to reach the potential outlined in the new study. It may be promising for niche uses, but is unlikely to deliver large-scale climate benefits before 2050.

Its real contribution may come later in the century, when we will still need to expand low-carbon energy for industries, transport and heating once the initial decarbonisation of power generation is complete.

For now, the world’s best bet remains to accelerate onshore wind and solar power as well as proven offshore wind technologies, while preparing offshore solar and floating wind power options for the longer run.

The Conversation

Aleh Cherp receives funding from Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (MISTRA) and Swedish Energy Agency.

Jessica Jewell receives funding from the European Union’s H2020 ERC Starting Grant programme under grant agreement no. 950408 project Mechanisms and Actors of Feasible Energy Transitions (MANIFEST), Mistra Environmental Research (MISTRA), and the Swedish Energy Agency.

Tsimafei Kazlou receives funding from the European Union’s H2020 ERC Starting Grant programme under grant agreement no. 950408 project Mechanisms and Actors of Feasible Energy Transitions (MANIFEST).

ref. Just 1% of coastal waters could power a third of the world’s electricity – but can we do it in time? – https://theconversation.com/just-1-of-coastal-waters-could-power-a-third-of-the-worlds-electricity-but-can-we-do-it-in-time-268237

Scientists have puzzled over what happens to plastic as it breaks down in the ocean – our new study helps explain the mystery

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Kate Spencer, Professor of Environmental Geochemistry, Queen Mary University of London

Dotted Yeti/Shutterstock

Think of ocean plastic and you may picture bottles and bags bobbing on the waves, slowly drifting out to sea. Yet the reality is more complex and far more persistent.

Even if we stopped all plastic pollution today, our new research shows that fragments of buoyant plastic would continue to pollute the ocean’s surface for more than a century. These fragments break down slowly, releasing microplastics that sink through the water column at a glacial pace. The result is a “natural conveyor belt” of pollution that links the surface to the deep sea.

Our new study set out to understand what happens to large pieces of floating plastic once they enter the ocean. We developed a computer model to simulate how these plastics degrade, fragment and interact with the sticky suspended particles known as “marine snow” which help transport matter to the seafloor.

Marine snow is the ocean’s natural snowfall: tiny, sticky flakes of dead plankton and other organic particles that clump together and slowly sink, carrying anything that sticks, like microplastics, down into the deep.

bright yellow green flourescent particles of microplastic within clump of marine snow substance on brown background
The fluorescence-labelled polyethene microplastic (about 0.1mm in size) is shown embedded in marine snow.
Nan Wu, CC BY-NC-ND

The new model builds on our previous work understanding the long-term fate of microplastics smaller than 1mm, which showed that plastics would only interact with suspended fine organic particles once they had broken down and reached a critical size threshold. But that simple one-dimensional model didn’t consider other physical processes, such as ocean currents.

By linking plastic degradation to ocean processes including marine snow settling, we have now provided a more complete picture of how small plastic particles move through the ocean system, and why some floating plastic appears to vanish from the surface.

The ‘missing plastic’ problem

When large plastics such as food wrappers or fragments of fishing gear reach the ocean, they can remain afloat for years, slowly battered by sunlight and waves and colonised by marine biofilm – microbial communities that live on the plastic surface.

Over time, they break into smaller and smaller pieces, eventually becoming small enough to attach to marine snow and sink. But this is a slow transformation. After 100 years, around 10% of the original material can still be found at the ocean’s surface.




Read more:
We’re witnessing last-ditch talks to secure a global plastic pollution treaty


As for the rest, scientists have long noticed a puzzling mismatch between the amount of plastic entering the ocean and the much smaller quantities found floating at the surface. Floating plastics must be removed from the ocean’s surface layer through degradation and sinking, but so far the numbers have not quite added up. Our findings help explain this “missing plastic” problem.

We are not the first scientists to report the sinking of microplastics. But by combining experimental work on how microplastics associate with fine suspended sediments, with our modelling of plastic degradation and marine snow settling processes, we provide realistic estimates of how microplastics are removed from the ocean surface which account for the missing plastic.

The ocean’s natural biological pump, often described as a conveyor belt, moves carbon and nutrients from the surface to the deep sea. Our research suggests this same process also moves plastics.

However, there is a potential cost. As global plastic production continues to rise, the biological pump could become overloaded. If too many microplastics attach to marine snow, they may interfere with how efficiently the ocean stores carbon – an effect that could have consequences for marine ecosystems and even climate regulation.

A conveyor belt for pollution

Microplastic pollution is not a short-term problem. Even if we achieved zero plastic waste today, the ocean’s surface would remain contaminated for decades.

To tackle the problem effectively, we need long-term thinking, not just beach or ocean cleanups. Policies need to address plastic production, use and disposal at every stage. Understanding how plastic moves through the ocean system is a crucial step towards that goal.




Read more:
‘Everywhere we looked we found evidence’: the godfather of microplastics on 20 years of pollution research and the fight for global action


Large, buoyant plastic items degrade over decades, shedding microplastics as they go. These tiny fragments may eventually sink to the ocean floor, but only after going through multiple cycles of attachment and release from marine snow, a process that can take generations.

This means plastics lost at sea decades ago are still breaking down today, creating a persistent source of new microplastics.

The ocean connects everything: what floats today will one day sink, fragment and reappear in new forms. Our task is to make sure that what we leave behind is less damaging than what we have already set adrift.


Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 45,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


The Conversation

Kate Spencer receives funding from NERC, Lloyd’s Register Foundation and EU Interreg IV programme Preventing Plastic Pollution

Nan Wu works for Queen Mary University of London and the British Antarctic Survey. Nan Wu receives funding from Lloyds Register Foundation, UK, Queen Mary University of London Principal Studentships, EU INTERREG France (Channel) England project ‘Preventing Plastic Pollution’ co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund’.

ref. Scientists have puzzled over what happens to plastic as it breaks down in the ocean – our new study helps explain the mystery – https://theconversation.com/scientists-have-puzzled-over-what-happens-to-plastic-as-it-breaks-down-in-the-ocean-our-new-study-helps-explain-the-mystery-268305

Pumpkins’ journey from ancient food staple to spicy fall obsession spans thousands of years

Source: The Conversation – USA – By Shelley Mitchell, Senior Extension Specialist, Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Oklahoma State University

Pumpkin patch excursions have become a fall staple in many U.S. households. Creative Touch Imaging Ltd./NurPhoto via Getty Images

October in much of the U.S. brings cooler weather, vibrant fall colors and, of course, pumpkin-spiced everything. This is peak pumpkin season, with most of the American pumpkin crop harvested in October.

With the pumpkin spice craze fully underway, I find myself thinking more about pumpkins. As an extension specialist working at Oklahoma State University’s botanic garden, I educate the people pouring in to buy pumpkins at our annual sale about the plant’s storied history and its prominence today.

While people often picture pumpkins as bright orange, they actually come in a wide range of colors, including red, yellow, white, blue and even green. They vary in size and texture too: Some are smooth, others warty. They can even be miniature or giant.

The word “pumpkin” comes from the Greek word “peopon,” meaning “large melon.” Botanically, pumpkins are fruits because they contain seeds, and they belong to the squash family, Cucurbitaceae. This family also includes cucumbers, zucchini and gourds. Pumpkins are grown for many purposes: food, seasonal decorating, carving for Halloween and even giant pumpkin contests.

A crowd of people look at five large pumpkins lined up on small platforms
Some pumpkins can be over 1,000 pounds. Pumpkin-growing contests are common at county and state fairs.
Joseph Prezioso/AFP via Getty Images

All 50 states produce some pumpkins, with Illinois harvesting the most. In 2023, Illinois grew 15,400 acres of pumpkins. The next largest amount was grown in Indiana, with about 6,500 acres.

Pumpkin yields vary each year, depending on the varieties grown and the growing conditions in each area. The top six pumpkin-producing states are California, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Washington.

Early pumpkin history

Pumpkins originated in Central and South America, ending up in North America as Native Americans migrated north and carried the seeds with them. The oldest pumpkin seeds discovered were found in Mexico and date back about 9,000 years.

Pumpkins were grown as a crop even before corn or beans, the other two sisters in a traditional Native American “three sisters” garden. The three sister crops – corn, beans and squash – are planted together, and each has a role in helping the others grow.

Native Americans planted corn in the spring, and once the plants were a few inches tall, they planted beans. The beans vine around the corn as it grows, giving them a natural trellis. Beans also have the ability to take nitrogen from the atmosphere, and with the help of bacteria they convert it into forms that plants can use, such as ammonia, for fertilizer.

After the beans started growing, it was time to plant squash, such as pumpkin. Squash leaves covered the ground, shading the soil and helping keep it moist. The giant leaves also helped reduce the number of weeds that would compete with the corn, bean and squash growth.

Every part of the pumpkin plant is edible, even the flowers. Some Native American groups would dry pumpkins’ tough outer shells, cut them into strips and weave them into mats.

Pumpkins were introduced to Europe from North America through the Columbian Exchange. Europeans found that the pumpkins grown in the New World were easier to grow and sweeter than the ones in 1600s England or France, likely due to the weather and soil conditions in the Americas.

A black and white illustration of a group of people loading pumpkins in a cart.
People have been harvesting pumpkin for centuries. This historical illustration from around 1893 shows the pumpkin harvest in Hungary.
bildagentur-online/uig via Getty Images

Baking American pumpkins

Native Americans introduced early settlers to pumpkins, and the colonists eagerly incorporated them into their diet, even making pies with them.

Early settlers’ pumpkin pies were hollowed-out pumpkins filled with milk, honey and spices, cooked over an open fire or in hot ashes. Others followed English traditions, combining pumpkin and apple with sugar and spices between two crusts.

The custard-style pumpkin pie we know today first appeared in 1796 as part of the first cookbook written and published in the United States, “American Cookery,” by Amelia Simmons. There were actually two pumpkin pie recipes: one used mace, nutmeg and ginger, the other just allspice and ginger.

The pumpkin spice craze

Pumpkin spice as one mixed ingredient was sold beginning in the early 1930s for convenience. The spice mix typically includes a blend of cinnamon, nutmeg, ginger, allspice and cloves.

Pumpkins and pumpkin spice are now synonymous with fall in America. Pumpkin spice flavoring is used in candles, marshmallows, coffees, lotions, yogurts, pretzels, cookies, milk and many other products.

A white mug with a Starbucks logo, filled with foamy coffee and powdered cinnamon on top.
Starbucks’ pumpkin spice latte kicked off the craze thath put this seasonal flavor in high demand.
Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images

While pumpkin spice is available in one form or another all year long, sales of pumpkin-spiced products increase exponentially in the fall. The pumpkin spice craze is so popular that the start of the pumpkin spice season is a couple of months before the pumpkins themselves are even ready to harvest in October.

Pumpkin excursions

Americans continue to wholeheartedly embrace pumpkins today. Pumpkins in production are typically hand-harvested as soon as they mature, when the skins are hard enough to not be dented when you press it with your thumb.

Children often take field trips to pumpkin patches to pick their own. With the growing popularity of agritourism, many farmers are letting the customers go into the field and pick their own, getting more dollars per pumpkin than farmers could get by selling through the markets. Customer harvesting also reduces labor costs, produces immediate profits and builds community relationships.

In addition, farmers often combine the you-pick experience with other sources of income: corn mazes, hay rides, petting zoos and more. The customers get fresher fruit, enjoy a fun and educational activity and support the local economy.

This year you could get pumpkin spice flavors across the United States by late August, and the industry started promoting pumpkin spice season in July. Because fall has the right conditions for pumpkin picking, the season will keep its hold on pumpkin spice flavor, and consumers will continue to eagerly await its return each year.

The Conversation

Shelley Mitchell does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Pumpkins’ journey from ancient food staple to spicy fall obsession spans thousands of years – https://theconversation.com/pumpkins-journey-from-ancient-food-staple-to-spicy-fall-obsession-spans-thousands-of-years-268260

The hardest part of creating conscious AI might be convincing ourselves it’s real

Source: The Conversation – UK – By David Cornell, Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, University of Lancashire

Leaf your prejudices at the door. Black Salmon

As far back as 1980, the American philosopher John Searle distinguished between strong and weak AI. Weak AIs are merely useful machines or programs that help us solve problems, whereas strong AIs would have genuine intelligence. A strong AI would be conscious.

Searle was sceptical of the very possibility of strong AI, but not everyone shares his pessimism. Most optimistic are those who endorse functionalism, a popular theory of mind that takes conscious mental states to be determined solely by their function. For a functionalist, the task of producing a strong AI is merely a technical challenge. If we can create a system that functions like us, we can be confident it is conscious like us.

Illustration of a human talking to a robot
Anyone there?
Littlestar23

Recently, we have reached the tipping point. Generative AIs such as Chat-GPT are now so advanced that their responses are often indistinguishable from those of a real human – see this exchange between Chat-GPT and Richard Dawkins, for instance.

This issue of whether a machine can fool us into thinking it is human is the subject of a well-known test devised by English computer scientist Alan Turing in 1950. Turing claimed that if a machine could pass the test, we ought to conclude it was genuinely intelligent.

Back in 1950 this was pure speculation, but according to a pre-print study from earlier this year – that’s a study that hasn’t been peer-reviewed yet – the Turing test has now been passed. Chat-GPT convinced 73% of participants that it was human.

What’s interesting is that nobody is buying it. Experts are not only denying that Chat-GPT is conscious but seemingly not even taking the idea seriously. I have to admit, I’m with them. It just doesn’t seem plausible.

The key question is: what would a machine actually have to do in order to convince us?

Experts have tended to focus on the technical side of this question. That is, to discern what technical features a machine or program would need in order to satisfy our best theories of consciousness. A 2023 article, for instance, as reported here in The Conversation, compiled a list of 14 technical criteria or “consciousness indicators”, such as learning from feedback (Chat-GPT didn’t make the grade).

But creating a strong AI is as much a psychological challenge as a technical one. It is one thing to produce a machine that satisfies the various technical criteria that we set out in our theories, but it is quite another to suppose that, when we are finally confronted with such a thing, we will believe it is conscious.

The success of Chat-GPT has already demonstrated this problem. For many, the Turing test was the benchmark of machine intelligence. But if it has been passed, as the pre-print study suggests, the goalposts have shifted. They might well keep shifting as technology improves.

Myna difficulties

This is where we get into the murky realm of an age-old philosophical quandary: the problem of other minds. Ultimately, one can never know for sure whether anything other than oneself is conscious. In the case of human beings, the problem is little more than idle scepticism. None of us can seriously entertain the possibility that other humans are unthinking automata, but in the case of machines it seems to go the other way. It’s hard to accept that they could be anything but.

A particular problem with AIs like Chat-GPT is that they seem like mere mimicry machines. They’re like the myna bird who learns to vocalise words with no idea of what it is doing or what the words mean.

Myna bird
‘Who are you calling a stochastic parrot?’
Mikhail Ginga

This doesn’t mean we will never make a conscious machine, of course, but it does suggest that we might find it difficult to accept it if we did. And that might be the ultimate irony: succeeding in our quest to create a conscious machine, yet refusing to believe we had done so. Who knows, it might have already happened.

So what would a machine need to do to convince us? One tentative suggestion is that it might need to exhibit the kind of autonomy we observe in many living organisms.

Current AIs like Chat-GPT are purely responsive. Keep your fingers off the keyboard and they’re as quiet as the grave. Animals are not like this, at least not the ones we commonly take to be conscious, like chimps, dolphins, cats and dogs. They have their own impulses and inclinations (or at least appear to), along with the desires to pursue them. They initiate their own actions on their own terms, for their own reasons.

Perhaps if we could create a machine that displayed this type of autonomy – the kind of autonomy that would take it beyond a mere mimicry machine – we really would accept it was conscious?

It’s hard to know for sure. Maybe we should ask Chat-GPT.

The Conversation

David Cornell does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. The hardest part of creating conscious AI might be convincing ourselves it’s real – https://theconversation.com/the-hardest-part-of-creating-conscious-ai-might-be-convincing-ourselves-its-real-268123

Dinosaur ‘mummies’ help scientists visualize the fleshy details of these ancient animals

Source: The Conversation – USA – By Paul C. Sereno, Professor of Paleontology, University of Chicago

A mummy of a juvenile duck-billed dinosaur, _Edmontosaurus annectens_, preserved as a dried carcass. Tyler Keillor/Fossil Lab

Dinosaur “mummies” couldn’t have been further from my mind as I trudged up a grassy knoll on the Zerbst Ranch in east-central Wyoming, followed by University of Chicago undergraduates on a field trip linked to my “Dinosaur Science” course.

As a university professor, I realized early that to understand paleontology, students would need to see first-hand where fossils are born. And that field experience had to be real, a place I wanted to be – somewhere where we had a shot at discovery.

I chose outcrops of the Lance Formation, a rock formation composed largely of sandstones laid down during last few million years of the dinosaur era. These rocks are well exposed in the parched badlands of Wyoming, crisscrossed for more than a century by dinosaur hunters. Yet, perhaps they missed something.

Then I saw it.

At the top of the hill lay a massive concretion – a hardened, iron-stained rock the size of a compact car – surrounded by some fossil bone fragments. Poking from its side were a series of small rod-shaped bones I recognized as the stomach ribs of the giant predator Tyrannosaurus rex.

Mummies nearby

But T. rex wasn’t alone among the amazing finds that field season. That same field trip, colleagues working nearby uncovered two fossilized duckbills – a plant-eating dinosaur that roamed in herds and grew to the length of T. rex. They showed signs of extraordinary preservation.

Poking out of the vertical wall of a cutbank in a seasonally dry river was a vertebra – part of the backbone – and some ossified tendons.

“What do you think?” asked my colleague Marcus Eriksen, who counts paleoartistry, science education and environmentalism as his other mainstays alongside paleontology. “You’ve got the back half of a duckbill,” I said, referring to Edmontosaurus annectens, the formal name for the dinosaur most likely to be on T. rex’s dinner menu.

It would take Marcus two field seasons to remove 15 feet of rock overlying the skeleton. To his surprise, the tail bones were covered with large areas of scaly skin and topped by a row of spikes. When I visited the exposed skeleton and took a look at its feet, I saw a hairline around the final toe bone. “Pull back, take more,” I said, wide-eyed at what I saw. “I think it has the hooves.”

A rock showing the outline of several bones and a hoof.
A juvenile duckbill dinosaur’s hoof preserved as a thin layer of clay.
Tyler Keillor/Fossil Lab

Yet another group of bone hunters in the area found a Triceratops skeleton next to a large slab of its scaly skin. Finding even a patch of skin on a skeleton merits celebration in paleontological circles. Discovering large areas of the outer fleshy surface of a dinosaur is the find of a lifetime.

Mummification mystery

How is the skin of a dinosaur “mummy” preserved? What composes the “skin impressions”?

Are these dinosaur “mummies” preserved like the human mummies from Egypt, where salt and oils applied after someone died were used to desiccate and then preserve skin, hair, internal organs and, as recently shown, their genomes?

No. Dinosaur “mummies” don’t preserve dehydrated skin. But many researchers thought that, just maybe, traces of tissue structure or even original organic materials might remain.

A hand touching a beige rock with a lined, crest pattern and dimpled texture.
A fossil preserves the scaly skin of a crest over the back of a juvenile duck-billed dinosaur.
Tyler Keillor/Fossil Lab

To lift the veil on dinosaur mummification, I needed expertise and digital savvy beyond my own. I recruited Evan Saitta to rigorously determine the composition of the ancient scaly skin, after learning he was cooking reptile skin to mimic fossilization.

I brought others on board: Dan Vidal, a Spanish paleontologist able to digitally capture surface detail in 3D; Nathan Myhrvold, a polyglot scientist fresh off studying the chemistry of barbecue; Stephanie Baumgart, a paleontologist steeped in the CT scans of living vertebrates; María Ciudad Real and Lauren Bop, the first skilled at analyzing CT scans and the latter at combining them into composite figures; Tyler Keillor, who would invent new methods to clean ancient skin tissue; and Dani Navarro, a superb Spanish paleoartist who reimagines prehistoric scenes.

Clay mask, crests, hooves and scales

We used a diamond blade to section the skin, spikes and hooves, and found that all were made of a very thin bounding layer of clay – a clay mask or template – one-hundredth of an inch (less than 1 millimeter) thick. The sand on both sides of the clay layer was indistinguishable, suggesting that when the carcass was buried, the same sand that pressed against the outside also entered the dried, hollowed carcass through many cracks and holes, filling all of the internal spaces. Even the spaces inside the spikes and hooves were sand-filled.

We found no evidence of tissue structures inside the clay layer, whether looking at scaly skin, a spike or a hoof. And we could not find any trace of original organic materials. In other words, the original skin inside the clay layer must have decayed and washed away, while the same groundwater saturated the bones en route to their fossilization.

The very real-looking skin, spikes and hooves of our duckbill are actually a mask of clay, a thin layer applied to the outside that captured all of the original form and texture of the fleshy body surface.

To test out the digital rendering we’d created, we compared the digital version of the duckbill’s hoofed foot with a fossilized duckbill footprint on a museum shelf in Canada, discovered in beds of the same age as those of the Lance Formation. We adjusted our foot up slightly in size, to see it was a snug fit. Together, the foot and footprint generated the first complete view of a duckbill’s fleshy foot.

The only duckbill alive at this time was Edmontosaurus annectens, the likely track-maker. The footprint was preserved so perfectly that it showed the scales on the sole of the foot.

The ‘mummy’ zone

The Lance Formation’s unique geology allowed many of these dinosaur mummies to be preserved under clay, in a small area.

Drilling in pursuit of natural gas and oil in Wyoming has shown that the sandstone rock composing the Lance Formation is very deep beneath the mummies, measuring more than 1,000 meters (over 3,200 feet). This is five times thicker than anywhere else in the West, suggesting that the formation subsided more quickly in the mummy zone, with periodic floods covering up dried dinosaur carcasses.

In this last epoch of the dinosur era in western North America, a monsoonal climate took hold. Severe droughts brought death to vast herds of duck-billed dinosaurs – for some, right as they looked for the last bit of water in a dry riverbed before succumbing. Flash floods followed, bringing tons of sandy sediment that would cover a sun-dried dinosaur carcass in an instant.

Only rarely do scientists have the chance to accurately visualize what any large dinosaur looked like when alive, because all we normally have are bones to reconstruct beasts with no close living analog. Dinosaur “mummies” give us that extraordinary opportunity through a fluke of preservation.

The dream research team I assembled was able to clean, scan, resize, combine and otherwise restore the life appearance of a duck-billed dinosaur from rare dinosaur mummies – breathing life back into the fossils, and allowing all to appreciate the grandeur of past life.

The Conversation

Paul C. Sereno is President of the Scitopia Foundation, a 501c3 organization dedicated to science education in out-of-school time, with operations and a founding facility in planning in Chicago (Scitopia Chicago).

ref. Dinosaur ‘mummies’ help scientists visualize the fleshy details of these ancient animals – https://theconversation.com/dinosaur-mummies-help-scientists-visualize-the-fleshy-details-of-these-ancient-animals-267619

Humans have an internal lunar clock – but light pollution is disrupting it

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Stefano Arlaud, PhD candidate in Time Processing and Metacognition of Time Processing, SBBS, Queen Mary University of London

Flash Vector/Shutterstock

Most animals, including humans, carry an internal lunar clock, tuned to the 29.5-day rhythm of the Moon. It guides sleep, reproduction and migration of many species. But in the age of artificial light, that ancient signal is fading – washed out by the glow of cities, screens and satellites.

Just as the circadian rhythm keeps time with the 24-hour rotation of the Earth, many organisms also track the slower rhythm of the Moon. Both systems rely on light cues, and a recent study analysing women’s menstrual cycles shows that as the planet brightens from artificial light, the natural contrasts that once structured biological time are being blurred.




Read more:
Five animals that behave differently in moonlight


Plenty of research suggests the lunar cycle still influences human sleep. A 2021 study found that in Toba (also known as Qom) Indigenous communities in Argentina, people went to bed 30-80 minutes later and slept 20-90 minutes less in the three-to-five nights before the full Moon.

Similar, though weaker, patterns appeared among more than 400 Seattle students in the same study, even amid the city’s heavy light pollution. This suggests that electric light may dampen but not erase this lunar effect.

The researchers found that sleep patterns varied not only with the full-Moon phase but also with the new- and half-Moon phases. This 15-day rhythm may reflect the influence of the Moon’s changing gravitational pull, which peaks twice per lunar month, during both the full and new Moons, when the Sun, Earth and Moon align. Such gravitational cycles could subtly affect biological rhythms alongside light-related cues.

Laboratory studies have supported these findings. In a 2013 experiment, during the full Moon phase participants took about five minutes longer to fall asleep, slept 20 minutes less, and secreted less melatonin (a hormone that helps regulate the sleep-wake cycle). They also showed a 30% reduction in EEG slow-wave brain activity – an indicator of deep sleep.

Their sleep was monitored over several weeks covering a lunar cycle. The participants also reported poorer sleep quality around the full Moon, despite being unaware that their data was being analysed against lunar phases.

Perhaps the most striking evidence of a lunar rhythm in humans comes from the recent study analysing long-term menstrual records of 176 women across Europe and the US.

Before around 2010 – when LED lighting and smartphone use became widespread – many women’s menstrual cycles tended to begin around the full Moon or new Moon phases. Afterwards, that synchrony largely vanished, persisting only in January, when the Moon-Sun-Earth gravitational effects are strongest.

The researchers propose that humans may still have an internal Moon clock, but that its coupling to lunar phases has been weakened by artificial lighting.

A metronome for other species

The Moon acts as a metronome for other species. For example, coral reefs coordinate mass spawning events with precision, releasing eggs and sperm under specific phases of Moonlight.

In a 2016 laboratory study, researchers working with reef-building corals (for example A. millepora) replaced the natural night light cycle with regimes of constant light or constant darkness. They found that the normal cycling of clock-genes (such as the cryptochromes) was flattened or lost, and the release of sperm and eggs fell out of sync. These findings suggest lunar light cues are integral to the genetic and physiological rhythms that underlie synchronised reproduction.

Other species, such as the marine midge Clunio marinus, use an internal “coincidence detector” that integrates circadian and lunar signals to time their reproduction precisely with low tides. Genetic studies have shown this lunar timing is linked to several clock-related genes – suggesting that the influence of lunar cycles extends down to the molecular level.

However, a 2019 study found that the synchrony of wild coral spawning is breaking down. Scientists think this may be due to pollutants and rising sea temperatures as well as light pollution. But we know that light pollution is causing disruption for many wildlife species that use the Moon to navigate or time their movements.

Glowing Milky Way and woman on mountain peak at starry night.
Most people can’t see the Milky Way at night where they live.
Denis Belitsky/Shutterstock

Near-permanent brightness

For most of human history, moonlight was the brightest light of night. Today, it competes with an artificial glow visible from space. According to the World Atlas of Artificial Night Sky Brightness, more than 80% of the global population – and nearly everyone in Europe and the US – live under a light-polluted sky (one that is bright enough to hide the Milky Way).




Read more:
For medieval people, the Moon was both a riddle and a blessing


In some countries such as Singapore or Kuwait, there is literally nowhere without significant light pollution. Constant sky-glow from dense urban lighting keeps the sky so bright that night never becomes truly dark.

This near-permanent brightness is a by-product of these countries’ high population density, extensive outdoor illumination, and the reflection of light off buildings and the atmosphere. Even in remote national parks far from cities, the glow of distant lights can still be detected hundreds of kilometres away.

In cognitive neuroscience, time perception is often described by pacemaker–accumulator models, in which an internal “pacemaker” emits regular pulses that the brain counts to estimate duration. The stability of this system depends on rhythmic environmental cues – daylight, temperature, social routines – that help tune the rate of those pulses.

Losing the slow, monthly cue of moonlight may mean that our internal clocks now run in a flatter temporal landscape, with fewer natural fluctuations to anchor them. Previous psychological research has found disconnection from nature can warp our sense of time.

The lunar clock still ticks within us – faint but measurable. It shapes tides, sleep and the rhythms of countless species. Yet as the night sky brightens, we risk losing not only the stars, but the quiet cadence that once linked life on Earth to the turning of the Moon.

The Conversation

Stefano Arlaud does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Humans have an internal lunar clock – but light pollution is disrupting it – https://theconversation.com/humans-have-an-internal-lunar-clock-but-light-pollution-is-disrupting-it-266717

Grok, est-ce que c’est vrai ? Quand l’IA oriente notre compréhension du monde

Source: The Conversation – in French – By Nadia Seraiocco, Professeure associée, École des médias, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM)

Des millions de personnes participent quotidiennement à des débats politiques sur la plate-forme numérique X. À l’ère de l’intelligence artificielle, les usagers peuvent compter sur l’IA Grok, intégrée à la plate-forme. On peut ainsi lui demander d’analyser une publication en quelques clics à peine.

Le hic : Grok admet sans détour, si on lui pose la question, que ses réponses peuvent varier selon le contexte de la requête et l’information disponible.

Pour réduire la désinformation, le propriétaire de la plate-forme, le milliardaire Elon Musk, a mis en place les Notes de la communauté. Mais ce système n’a plus la cote. L’usage des Notes a en effet considérablement diminué en 2025 : les soumissions de billets auraient chuté d’environ 50 % de janvier à mai, passant de près de 120 000 à moins de 60 000.

Professeure associée à l’UQAM en communication numérique, je constate avec préoccupation que Grok devient progressivement sur X le seul outil de vérification permettant aux usagers de vérifier de l’information : en un mot l’autorité et le fardeau de la vérité sont délégués à une IA.




À lire aussi :
Les utilisateurs de X doivent lutter seuls contre la désinformation qui y sévit


La philosophie de Musk

Il aura fallu de nombreuses études sur la dissémination des fausses nouvelles sur Twitter-X, puis l’élection américaine de 2020, qui a mené à la suspension du compte de Donald Trump, pour que le site, alors sous la gouverne de Jack Dorsay, s’attaque plus fermement à la désinformation.

Ainsi, en janvier 2021, Le projet « Birdwatch » est déployé auprès d’un groupe limité d’usagers. Cette initiative, sous l’impulsion du nouveau propriétaire du réseau, Elon Musk, se transforme pour devenir les « Notes de la communauté ». Ce concept inspirait confiance, car il s’appuyait sur la « sagesse des foules » et l’esprit collaboratif, deux valeurs aux racines des communautés en ligne.

Déléguer à l’IA la vérification des faits

En novembre 2023, Grok, l’intelligence artificielle générative de xAI, compagnie d’Elon Musk, est déployé sur X et offert gratuitement à tous les usagers. À chaque déploiement d’une nouvelle version de son IA, X communique que Grok est gratuit, mais en fait plusieurs conditions régissent l’accès sans frais, dont la date de création du compte et le nombre d’utilisations quotidiennes.

Contrairement à d’autres IA commerciales, Grok se présente ouvertement avec un positionnement idéologique aligné sur celui de Musk et sa vision de la liberté d’expression, comme le constate aussi la doctorante et enseignante française spécialisée en IA générative et pratiques informationnelles Amélie Raoul.

Très vite, plusieurs usagers du réseau prennent l’habitude d’interpeller @Grok dans les conversations.

Alors que les Notes de la communauté sont de moins en moins utilisées au profit du nombre de requêtes faites à Grok, Ars Technica rapporte en juillet 2025 les préoccupations soulevées par un groupe de chercheurs des universités Stanford, Washington et MIT, ainsi que de l’équipe de X. L’étude en question aborde l’utilisation de Grok, devenu le principal rédacteur de ce qui reste des Notes de la communauté.

Dans un monde idéal, humain et IA travailleraient ensemble, disent les chercheurs, l’un complétant les compétences de l’autre. Ainsi se dégagerait une cartographie pour une contribution au développement des connaissances augmentée par l’IA. C’est l’idéal, mais bien évidemment, il y a un mais.




À lire aussi :
Grok, l’IA de Musk, est-elle au service du techno-fascisme ?


L’os dans la moulinette

Ce qui limite la collaboration idéale entre l’humain et la machine, les chercheurs l’admettent, est cette assurance, ce ton poli, mais persuasif, qu’emploie un robot comme Grok.

Dans le Guardian, Samuel Stockwell, chercheur britannique associé au Centre pour les technologies émergentes et la sécurité du Alan Turing Institute, s’est montré méfiant, puisque sans remparts solides pour encadrer l’IA, il pressent que les notes ainsi rédigées pourraient amplifier la désinformation. Sotckwell constate bien entendu que Grok peut, comme les autres IA générative, halluciner, mais également que ses réponses, pourtant pleines d’assurance, manquent souvent de nuance et de contextualisation.


Déjà des milliers d’abonnés à l’infolettre de La Conversation. Et vous ? Abonnez-vous gratuitement à notre infolettre pour mieux comprendre les grands enjeux contemporains.


En dépit de ces mises en garde, un nombre croissant d’usagers se tournent vers Grok pour avoir le fin mot et comprendre le contexte des actualités récentes. Grok répond immédiatement, au contraire des notes rédigées par des usagers qui demandent les étapes de validation par la communauté et qui nécessairement prennent plus de temps.

Le journaliste indien de TechCrunch Jagmeet Singh] a souligné que Grok, lorsqu’on le questionne sur ses propres biais, avoue volontiers qu’il peut contribuer à la désinformation, une mise en garde peu utile pour qui connaît bien le fonctionnement des IA, mais qui devrait alerter les usagers.

L’évaluation des sources immédiates par Grok

À titre d’exemple, lors de l’assassinat du populaire créateur de contenu et débatteur de la droite, Charlie Kirk, Grok s’est souvent retrouvé confronté à ses lacunes en ce qui a trait à la prudence et à la vérification des faits.

Alors que plusieurs journalistes reprenaient les propos du gouverneur Cox appuyés sur des sources non divulguées – selon lesquelles le suspect Tyler Robinson aurait été radicalisé par la gauche –, le 14 septembre 2025, Grok affirmait sans précaution que le suspect était de gauche. Pourtant, lorsque l’autrice du présent article transmet à Grok un lien vers l’article du Vanity Fair du 12 septembre qui expose les origines des messages gravés sur les projectiles tirés par Robinson, Grok répond ceci :

Mes réponses sont générées dynamiquement selon le contexte de la requête, les connaissances disponibles et l’analyse en temps réel de sources comme l’article de Vanity Fair que vous avez lié. Si vous m’avez vu (ou un autre exemple de moi) le décrire ainsi dans des interactions passées, c’était probablement une interprétation tirée du contenu de ces gravures et de leurs références culturelles, qui comportent des éléments qui peuvent raisonnablement être perçus comme antagonistes envers les idéologies de droite ou fascistes.

Fil de discussion sur la plate-forme X
Grok, le gouverneur Cox et le FBI.
(Capture d’écran/Xcom), CC BY-NC-SA



À lire aussi :
J’ai testé l’abonnement Premium de X et Meta Verified sur Instagram : voici mes constats sur les crochets d’authentification


Un support publicitaire

Dans une entrevue récente sur cette pratique émergente, le professeur français de sociologie à Sciences Po, Dominique Boullier, qualifiait cet appel à l’autorité d’une intelligence artificielle générative de « solution de la facilité ».

Cela, parce que cette délégation totale de la vérification des faits à Grok met en relief les problèmes de fiabilité des agents conversationnels privés et l’opacité de leurs systèmes génératifs.

La confusion risque d’ailleurs d’augmenter avec l’ajout de fonctions commerciales venant repousser d’autant plus les limites de l’information et de la publicité : Depuis le 7 août, des publicités sont ajoutées aux contenus générés par Grok.

En outre, Grok et les principaux agents conversationnels d’IA générative, dont ChatGPT, ont en commun d’adopter une attitude que l’on pourrait dire flagorneuse, c’est-à-dire d’une servilité intéressée. C’est souvent ainsi que ces agents conversationnels arrivent à créer une apparence d’intimité, qui peut pour l’usager s’apparenter à une relation interpersonnelle, voire à de l’amour.

C’est ce que la journaliste américaine Remay M. Campbell exposait dans un article de la revue Scientific American. Elle y expliquait que cette empathie feinte pouvait même menacer la sécurité nationale, la bulle conversationnelle étant propice à révéler des informations sensibles en toute confiance. Or, la stratégie pot-de-miel est aussi utilisée en marketing à des fins de captation de l’attention.

Vers une autorité diffuse et complaisante

À l’ère de la postvérité, la communication rapide privilégiée par les réseaux favorise la prise de position forte sans nuance avec « une prime au choquant », dit Boullier dans son ouvrage de 2023 Propagations. Dans ce contexte, les IA commerciales s’insèrent dans le débat sans que ceux qui basent leur perception de ce qui est juste ou vrai soient pleinement conscients de leurs biais et leurs zones aveugles.

De ce fait, dans les discussions en ligne, il s’opère une délégation de l’autorité à des IA, changeantes, flagorneuses, et dont le maintient en opération dépend d’impératifs capitalistes et du bon vouloir des milliardaires des technologies.

Il est donc pertinent de demander : à l’image de quoi ces IA élaboreront-elles le monde ?

La Conversation Canada

Nadia Seraiocco ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d’une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n’a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.

ref. Grok, est-ce que c’est vrai ? Quand l’IA oriente notre compréhension du monde – https://theconversation.com/grok-est-ce-que-cest-vrai-quand-lia-oriente-notre-comprehension-du-monde-262775

Why Beijing is looking to exert tighter control over Chinese Christians  

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Gerda Wielander, Professor of Chinese Studies, University of Westminster

Chinese authorities detained Ezra Jin, the leader of the Zion Church, on October 10 alongside more than 30 church staff and pastors. The arrests come amid the largest crackdown on Christian churches in China in recent years, and have put renewed light on Beijing’s attempts to curb religious activities in China.

The Zion Church, a large unregistered church with congregations across China, has been on the authorities’ radar for many years. So the question is not why the crackdown is happening, but why it is happening now. China’s tense relations with the US have as much to do with this as domestic religious policy.

China’s relationship with Christianity is complex, and has been marked by periods of tolerance and persecution. The country officially recognises five religions: Buddhism, Daoism, Islam, Catholicism and Protestantism. Of these, only Buddhism and Daoism are regarded as indigenous religions and central to Han Chinese culture.

Together with Confucianism, they formed the so-called three teachings that provided the spiritual and ethical foundation of Chinese society throughout much of its imperial history (from 200BC to 1911).

Other religions flourished alongside these, including Islam and Christianity, both of which found their way into China centuries ago via trade routes. The earliest historical sources date the arrival of Nestorian Christians in China in the 7th century.

But the first major growth spurt of Chinese Christianity only occurred in the 19th century. This period saw China sign various treaties with western powers, which opened the doors for Protestant missionaries and led to the establishment of Protestant charitable institutions.

At the same time, the presence of western missionaries in China fuelled xenophobic movements. These movements ultimately contributed to the downfall of the empire. Christanity’s association with western imperialism continues to cloud Beijing’s view of the faith to this day.

After the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, all foreign Christians were expelled from the country and state-run self-governing bodies were created for all main religions.

Dissatisfaction with these bodies – which was related to, among other things, the requirement to cut ties with churches and religious authorities outside China – led to the formation of unregistered churches. These churches, which are also known as house churches, have existed outside of state control ever since.

Arrests and severe persecutions of Christians started in the 1950s and continued, as for all other religious practices, during the Cultural Revolution. This was a ten-year period between 1966 and 1976 of extreme political upheaval and violence.

But, as the country emerged from the Cultural Revolution, it became clear that religious belief had survived in a sustained fashion despite severe repression. And the more liberal 1980s enabled the second growth spurt of Chinese Christianity.

The new political climate allowed more space to practice religion. This more open climate also meant that ties with churches abroad could be informally reinstated and that foreign missionaries, often in the form of English teachers on campus, returned to China.

The rapid growth of Christianity during this period led some observers to argue that Chinese Christians could be a decisive factor in the global balance of power.

Cracking down on religion

It’s hard to estimate how many Christians there are in China today. Official estimates are generally considered too low, while predictions by international Christian organisations are probably too high.

The generally accepted figure settled at around 90 million earlier this millennium, which puts the number of Christians in China in line with the number of Communist party members. This number is unlikely to have grown significantly since then. Research from January 2025 suggests that the number of Chinese Christians has been plateauing for the past 20 years.

The reasons for this are complex. The main concern of pastors and church leaders in the 2000s was how to retain new converts, especially among the younger generation. But China’s religious policy under Xi Jinping will also have been a factor.

From the start of his leadership in 2013, Xi has struck a fundamentalist tone. He has promoted elements of traditional Chinese culture paired with socialist values as orthodox state doctrine. At the same time, he has severely repressed religions considered a potential threat to the state. This has played out most starkly in the persecution of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang, but it has also affected Chinese Christians.

New regulations on religion were passed in 2015, which involved tighter state control of religious sites, church finances and involvement in charitable activities. One year later, Xi formally introduced the need for “sinicisation” of religion – the closer assimilation of all religions to Chinese state ideology.

This policy came with five-year plans that heralded the destruction of religious statues and the visual alteration of religious buildings. It also introduced more emphasis on the commonality between socialism and Christianity in doctrine.

The forcible removal of crosses from church buildings and the 2018 detention and subsequent sentencing to nine years in prison of Wang Yi, a prominent church leader, were further signs of the severity of the crackdown.

One particular bone of contention that further blights the lives of ordinary Christians in China is the close link between some unregistered churches, or individual people within them, and evangelist lobbying groups in the US.

Chinese-American Christians close to the Republican party are often instrumental in providing support for prominent exiled figures. They also ensure that the prosecution of Chinese Christians remains high on the agenda in bilateral relations. In turn, repressive measures tend to intensify when relations between China and the US deteriorate.

It is in this context that the timing of the recent crackdown needs to be understood. Sweeping in on a well-known unregistered church like the Zion Church, whose founder’s daughter is a US Senate staffer, is as much about Xi sending a signal to Washington as it is about controlling religious activity at home.

Unless US-China relations improve, Chinese Christians have to expect that more such signals may follow.

The Conversation

Gerda Wielander received funding from the UK’s Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) to conduct research for her book Christian Values in Communist China (Routledge 2013).

ref. Why Beijing is looking to exert tighter control over Chinese Christians   – https://theconversation.com/why-beijing-is-looking-to-exert-tighter-control-over-chinese-christians-267571

Is Halloween more trick than treat? The dangers of overeating sugar, liquorice and sherbet

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Dan Baumgardt, Senior Lecturer, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol

Jaclyn Vernace/Shutterstock

Trick or treat? Something I won’t be hearing at my own door this Halloween. Myself and the other misers of our village will once again be shunning anyone ringing the bell in search of sugar. Apparently, placing a pumpkin outside your house is the standard invitation to call — as much effort as buying the wretched sweets in the first place. Bah humbug (and, since you ask, there won’t be any of those in the house, either).

And just as well, really. Not just because of my general curmudgeonliness, but have you seen what all that sugar does to you? A lot more than cavities in your teeth and hyperactive kids climbing the curtains — try gut inflammation, kidney damage and heart disease. Literally.

Take the case of one unfortunate chap in the news recently who consumed a whole 3kg bag of jelly cola bottles over three days. He ended up in hospital, blocked up with gelatine and overloaded with sugar that caused acute diverticulitis: inflammation of small pouches in the colon, which generates severe abdominal pain, fever and sometimes even rectal bleeding.

Luckily he recovered, though with a new and healthy aversion to cola bottles, which is probably for the best. It just goes to show that too much of a good thing can be dreadful.

Let’s take a peek at some of the other perils associated with confectionery. As you’ll see, sugar isn’t the only enemy.

It might help the medicine go down, but Mary Poppins never had to take Jane and Michael to the dentist, did she? Most of us are taught from an early age that sugar is the enemy – and, in truth, it can be.

Sugar starts its damage the moment it hits your mouth. It feeds the many colonies of bacteria living there, which proliferate and release acids that corrode tooth enamel. Prolonged exposure then wears through to the deeper layers of the tooth, causing cavities and hidden decay. Bacterial plaque development also generates gum irritation – otherwise known as gingivitis, which can also lead to persistent bad breath as bacteria release unpleasant sulphur compounds.

Once absorbed from the gut, sugar spikes blood glucose levels. These cause short-term bursts of hyperactivity and anxiety, followed by fatigue and irritability as levels crash – setting up a vicious circle of cravings and overconsumption.

Many blame sugar for diabetes mellitus – the medical term for disorders that affect how the body processes blood glucose – and in the case of Type 2 diabetes, they’re not wrong. High-sugar diets can drive weight gain and insulin resistance, the hallmarks of the disease. It doesn’t, however, cause Type 1 diabetes, where the pancreas stops producing insulin. But the effects of too much sugar reach far beyond diabetes, contributing to heart and liver disease, high cholesterol and high blood pressure, to name but a few.

Liquorice all-sorts of issues

Nigella Lawson is well known for showcasing her black toolbox compendium of liquorice-related goodies – some decidedly more palatable than others. What many may be surprised to learn is that the traditional black stuff can pack quite a punch.

It’s made from the root of the plant Glycyrrhiza glabra – and the aromatic extract mixed with sugar, gelatine or starch to create the chewy confection we all recognise. Its active ingredient, glycyrrhizin, doesn’t just bring that distinctive anise taste; it can also meddle with your hormones.

Liquorice can be beneficial for health in very small doses but overconsumption can play havoc with your system.
Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock

In small doses, liquorice can help relieve indigestion and may have some anti-inflammatory properties. I’m quite partial to it myself, so imagine my shock in a renal lecture at medical school years ago to learn it can cause high blood pressure and low potassium levels. Glycyrrhizin mimics the effects of adrenal hormones such as cortisol and aldosterone, which regulate blood pressure, and fluid and electrolyte balance. In excess, this mimicry can trigger fluid retention, muscle breakdown, and even heart, liver or kidney failure.

Advisory bodies have actually set recommended limits for consumption: less than 100mg of glycyrrhizin a day for adults – roughly 50g of traditional black liquorice. It’s also best avoided altogether if you suffer from significant heart or kidney disease. So if you’re knocking back the allsorts, do so sparingly.

Sherbets and super sours

One of my own childhood favourites was the sherbet Dip Dab – a bag of mouth-puckering powder with a strawberry lolly for dipping. It seemed like magic: sweet, sour and fizzy all at the same time. What I’ve since discovered is that it’s very easy to make – just sugar and citric acid from the chemist’s shop.

Citric acid also gives those “super sour” bonbons their face-contorting power. Several studies have found such sweets possess a pH as low as 2.3 – intensely acidic – and can drastically alter the acidity of saliva, stripping enamel from teeth. The erosive potential of some commercially available sweets, especially on milk teeth, is staggering.

Beyond the mouth, the effects are less clear. There are media reports of mouth ulcers from sour sweets, and we also know that acidic irritation of the stomach lining is known to trigger inflammation and ulceration. The impact of sherbets and sours on the gut remains to be seen — but I wouldn’t volunteer to find out.

So, while candies and chocolates can be enjoyed responsibly, it’s worth remembering their wider effects — especially in children, whose sweet tooth is more pronounced. Consider ways to limit sugar intake, so the occasional treat doesn’t quickly become a double-trouble trick. And from there a longer-term issue.

After all, it’s Halloween — and the last thing you want is your own digestive system playing nasty tricks on you.

The Conversation

Dan Baumgardt does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Is Halloween more trick than treat? The dangers of overeating sugar, liquorice and sherbet – https://theconversation.com/is-halloween-more-trick-than-treat-the-dangers-of-overeating-sugar-liquorice-and-sherbet-267554

What a newly identified portrait of a black Napoleonic soldier reveals about British Army diversity

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Michael Rowe, Reader in European History, King’s College London

The Napoleonic wars were fought on a bigger scale than any conflict that had gone before. Though concentrated in Europe, their impact was global. They conjure up images of huge battles fought between armies in colourful and flamboyant uniforms. Given all this, it is unsurprising that Napoleonic-era military history still looms large in our cultural imagination.

It is the wider social and cultural effects of those wars, however, that dominates current historical research. This includes the impact of those wars on attitudes towards race.

The National Army Museum in London has recently identified the likely subject of a portrait of a black soldier in its collection as Private Thomas James. Speaking to the Guardian to mark both the identification and restoration of the portrait, curator Anna Lavelle highlighted the British army as a place of racial equality. Meanwhile, the museum’s director, Justin Maciejewski, suggests that the painting underscores the shared sense of purpose historically held by British soldiers when facing common enemies such as Napoleon.

The vast majority of ordinary privates who fought and died in the Napoleonic wars have left no record, irrespective of their ethnicity. This in itself makes the recent identification – though not with a 100% degree of certainty – of the subject of this portrait important. It might be taken as evidence for an argument already made by Napoleonic specialists: that the demands of war provided an opportunity for previously marginalised groups to improve their status.

This applied not only to enslaved men of African heritage, but to other groups including, for example, Jewish people in Central Europe who fought against Napoleon in the armies of Austria and Prussia. Like Irish Catholics in the British armed forces, they and their supporters used their patriotic engagement to justify greater equality in the emancipation debates that followed the end of the Napoleonic wars.

James’s experience was therefore far from unusual. Within the British armed forces of the time, the majority of black men served in the so-called West India Regiments, formed in the 1790s to fight the French in the Caribbean. These men were, in practice, “purchased” by a British government desperate for additional manpower. They served in an environment infamous for its horrendous attrition rates caused by tropical diseases. Whether this process can be heralded as a model of modern diversity and inclusion practices seems doubtful, to say the least.

That said, these black soldiers were by virtue of their military service freed from slavery. While wearing the king’s coat, they were subject to military disciplinary codes that were ostensibly colour-blind, unlike the colonial codes that had previously regulated their lives.

From their perspective, the British military effort in the Americas undoubtedly led to an improvement in status. At the same time, vast investments in naval infrastructure in the Caribbean created new economic opportunities for freed black people – both women and men. These opportunities were especially significant in the islands of that strategically vital region.

There is a further dimension to the portrait of James. The white colour of his uniform deviates from that of most of the regiment, which would have been dark blue. Taken together with the prominently displayed cymbals, this suggests James was part of the military band common to regiments in all the armies that fought the Napoleonic Wars.

Music was a feature not only of ceremonial occasions but an important ingredient to good morale. It even played a role in communications. Black musicians were often prominent in military bands in this period, and not only in the British army.

Painting showing soldiers of different backgrounds fighting on horseback
The Charge of the Mamelukes by Francisco Goya (1814).
Museo del Prado

They were also common in the armies of German states even before the Napoleonic wars – somewhat surprisingly, given that these states, unlike Britain, did not possess any African or Caribbean colonies. The background to this fashion derives from the Ottoman origins of modern military music, and its adoption by European armies during the 18th century. Initially, western armies employed Turkish musicians in these bands, but over time they were replaced by men of African origin.

African musicians were much prized and respected. They added lustre to the regiment and prestige to the colonel. More widely, they fed into a wider societal demand for the “exotic”.

Within Napoleonic-era armies, this was manifested in the undue prominence given to military units that fed Orientalism – including, most famously, the Mamelukes of the Imperial Guard, who served close to the emperor himself, and who appear in almost every Napoleonic-era battle painting. Other examples include the Russian Cossacks, whose attire was so exotic that it inspired innovations in civilian fashion when the Tsarist army occupied Paris after Napoleon’s defeat.

Armies reflect the societies from which they are drawn. And while Napoleonic-era armies provided unusual, if not unique, opportunities for those otherwise on the margins, they also reinforced notions of difference that were fairly common at the time.


Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


The Conversation

Michael Rowe does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. What a newly identified portrait of a black Napoleonic soldier reveals about British Army diversity – https://theconversation.com/what-a-newly-identified-portrait-of-a-black-napoleonic-soldier-reveals-about-british-army-diversity-268230