I volunteer in a repair cafe: we can help you learn to fix your broken Christmas gift

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Stuart Walker, Research Fellow in Sustainabilty Assessment, University of Sheffield

Hundreds of broken toys get thrown away after Christmas. Zamrznuti tonovi/Shutterstock

It’s a Wednesday evening in a town hall in Penryn in Cornwall, and my friend Pete and I are volunteering at our local repair cafe. We set up tables, get our tools ready, put up a sign outside and wait for people to arrive.

By the time we pack up three hours later, along with two other volunteers we have helped repair three vacuum cleaners, a pair of jeans, a laptop, a desk lamp, a clock and an electric skateboard, as well as replacing many buttons, zips, fuses, and bulbs. Some products have returned home with their owners, either to come back next time to fit a part we’ve ordered, or sadly because their design means we can’t repair them.

Repair cafes are often busy in the weeks post-Christmas when people discover their gifts are either broken or damaged in the post and they want to save them. One report found nearly half of toys received at Christmas will be broken and end up in landfill by spring.

The repair cafe movement tries to reduce the effect of this on the environment by encouraging citizens to repair rather than replace items. We regularly repair coffee machines, headphones, torches and fit new screens for computers.

The Repair Cafe International Foundation currently identifies 3,823 cafes globally, including 446 in the UK and 550 in Germany, and a total of 2,500 across the EU.

The “right to repair law”, officially the European Directive on Repair, was passed in April 2024, and is helping to drive the movement to repair more everyday items across Europe, by forcing manufacturers to do more to help consumers to get items repaired. A recent study found that around 35 million tonnes of goods were discarded across Europe, when they could have been repaired.

The value of the movement is in showing people they don’t need to replace products, and helping them learn how to fix themselves. Even if a volunteer ultimately does the fixing, sitting opposite someone as they realise their Christmas gift is no longer broken is a really positive experience. It can get quite emotional.

Stuart Walker (in white shirt) sitting at a table helping people repair items.
Stuart Walker (in white shirt) helping people repair items in Falmouth, Cornwall.
Falmouth and Penryn Repair Cafe

We always start with the simplest repair: cleaning. Often a proper clean either fixes a problem or reveals the cause. Then perhaps we’ll teach someone how to successfully glue parts back together using clamps to hold things in place, or to use a cotton bud to clean up after leaking batteries.

With complex products or electronics, I teach people to methodically work through the product, removing parts and testing with our tools as they go, until we can identify exactly which part isn’t working and why, making what seemed an overwhelming problem into a simple repair. We can then either fix, replace or remove any broken parts.

Recently I helped someone find the cause of their broken drill (a small wire disconnected from a light on the top). I showed them how to solder, and after a few practice runs on some spare parts they reattached the wire and repaired the tool. As they put it, “fixed drills and brand new skills”.

Repairs takes time. If you try to do it quickly, the repairer just ends up doing it all. That is less rewarding for most people. It makes the owner feel like they have to pay, changes the dynamic, and doesn’t teach anyone anything.

I’ve had lovely experiences repairing heirlooms and jewellery for elderly ladies, and toys for kids. Volunteer repairers don’t charge for their time, so a repair is either free or done for a small donation.

What we repair

Vacuum cleaners are one of the most common items brought in, and consistently in the top three items reported by 80 of the UK’s 446 repair cafes. Repairing a machine can delay the emission of the 70kg CO₂ related to the materials and manufacture of a new one.

Fixing things can be expensive if you take objects into commercial repairers. A 2021 study in Norway found the “consistently low price of new products” to be the most common barrier to commercial repair. If things are cheap, it can feel easier to just buy something new, and we don’t always think about the waste we are creating.

Repairs save people money, and by slowing the constant influx of new purchases it reduces global emissions as well, and we hope, over time, we are helping the wider public learn some of these forgotten skills too.


Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 47,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


The Conversation

Stuart Walker works for the Grantham Centre for Sustainable Futures. He is affiliated with Hope Valley Climate Action and the Repair Cafe Movement.

ref. I volunteer in a repair cafe: we can help you learn to fix your broken Christmas gift – https://theconversation.com/i-volunteer-in-a-repair-cafe-we-can-help-you-learn-to-fix-your-broken-christmas-gift-271459

Heritage railway volunteers show how deep friendships can be formed without discussing emotions

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Tom Yarrow, Professor of Anthropology, Durham University

“Let’s face it, we’re just not that into emotions,” Brian tells me with a smile talking with other volunteers at a heritage steam railway in northern England. They are discussing a popular TV restoration show. Allan grimaces, parodying the presenter: “He’s always jumping around, shoving the microphone in their faces, like, ‘How do you feel?’ ‘Does this make you sad?’ You can almost see his glee when people actually cry!”

This parody of emotional disclosure captures something important about the values of a group of men I’ve spent years working alongside.

In public discourse and mental health campaigns, emotional expression is often viewed as essential to mental health. This weighs particularly heavily on discussions of older men. Research routinely links male emotional “repression” to “traditional” and even “toxic” forms of masculinity, connecting an inability to talk about feelings to social isolation and self-alienation.

My research suggests that this narrative misses something crucial about how connection actually works. To research this subject, I spent over four years working closely with volunteers at a heritage railway, observing their everyday interactions, and talking to them about their friendships.

The volunteers – mostly retired men from former industrial towns in north-east England – explicitly reject the modern emphasis on emotional disclosure. Through the work of restoring railways, they are preserving a form of friendship which is elsewhere increasingly rare – one characterised by the more “old-fashioned” value of taciturnity, where the discussion of emotions is not expected or required.

Rather than dismiss their approach as “repression”, I argue in a forthcoming paper that we need to appreciate how people can develop intimate and caring relationships, without naming emotions.

Feeling without emotion

Among the men I came to know, I was initially struck by the lack of talk about their personal lives. Even when facing difficult circumstances including health problems and bereavement, they rarely spoke about their feelings. Instead, they talked about shared interests in railways, and the work that they engaged in. It took me a long time to realise that this did not reflect a lack of care.

Working together on restoration projects creates what they call “camaraderie”, a form of friendship that is grounded in doing things together, rather than in the reflection on interior feelings that has become an increasing expectation of modern intimacy.

Restoring and repairing railway infrastructure involves physically demanding manual labour. They work alongside one another in close proximity for long periods of time.

As we struggled with a particularly stubborn toilet seat installation in a cramped coach cubicle, one volunteer wryly observed in a bantering tone that is common: “There’s more than one way of killing a pig and stuffing its arse with butter!” He later explained: “If the job’s too hard, there’s a simpler way of doing it.” Friendships are forged through the process of facing and overcoming these practical problems. Shared tasks create a sense of shared purpose.

Over the decades, this creates a distinctive form of intimacy. Closeness is brought about through shared activities and interests, not personal revelation.

Paradoxically, the more intimate these relationships are, the harsher the “banter” can be. And the closer their friendships, the more they feel comfortable in sharing silence. It may seem that this is uncaring, but in fact the reverse is true.

Connecting through silence

Ron was a taciturn former merchant navy worker in his 70s. As a regular volunteer for over a decade, concern quickly grew among the group when he stopped appearing. When he finally returned several weeks later, he was visibly breathless and struggled to walk. Nobody asked directly what was wrong. Instead, they offered tea and made jokes.

After he left, discussion made it clear that this was deliberate. His friends had observed him carefully and were worried. Their silence was a thoughtful response to his own: a way of giving him the “normality” that he seemed to want.

I observed these patterns of interaction in many other situations. What might look like emotional inarticulacy is actually a deliberate ethic of care. These men aren’t unable to discuss feelings. But often they choose not to, viewing these silences as a way to respect the autonomy and privacy of others. In this respect, my research builds on ethnographic accounts, for example of firefighters and male hospital porters that draw attention to forms of intimacy and connection that do not depend on the discussion of personal feelings and emotions.

Though men at the railway rarely discuss feelings, these are understood by other means. The way someone looks, or the manner in which they work can be telling. In response, they show care through deeds: checking in via phone calls, offering practical help, creating space for silent companionship without pressure to explain or disclose – “just being there”, as they sometimes say.

Mental health services and support initiatives increasingly target men with messages about “opening up”. Indeed, my research doesn’t suggest emotional expression is wrong or unhelpful. However, either/or framings, which view connection in opposition to repression miss important aspects of the many ways people sustain intimacy and support.

My work with railway enthusiasts shows how it is possible to create meaningful support networks that offer genuine intimacy and connection, without explicit discussion of emotions. Connection and care take multiple forms. For some, silence shared between friends isn’t an absence of feeling, just a different way of sharing it.

The Conversation

Tom Yarrow does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Heritage railway volunteers show how deep friendships can be formed without discussing emotions – https://theconversation.com/heritage-railway-volunteers-show-how-deep-friendships-can-be-formed-without-discussing-emotions-266435

What to do if you fail at your new year resolution

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Janina Steinmetz, Professor in Marketing, Bayes Business School, City St George’s, University of London

Krakenimages.com/Shutterstock

Every year, many of us bravely announce our resolutions for the new year. A glass of champagne on New Year’s Eve might add to our confidence in our ability to do better in the coming year and save more, spend less, eat better, work out more, or binge-watch less.

But most of our resolutions fail. Even within the first weeks after New Year’s Eve, the majority of people have given up on them. Yet, not all tales of failure are the same, because the way you talk about the failure matters for your own motivation and other people’s confidence in your ability to try again.

So what can we do after we’ve given up on our resolution? We’ve announced our
good intentions to friends and family and now must admit failure. Research has shown the way you word your failed resolution can affect how people view it. And understanding the reasons most resolutions don’t work out can help us see it through in the future. Indeed, you can talk about your resolutions in a way that will make your failure more understandable and will sustain your motivation to keep going.

A constructive way to discuss your failed resolution is to focus on the controllability of the failure. Research shows that most resolutions will require some investment of time and of money. For example, getting in shape takes time for exercise and also normally requires money for a gym membership or for workout equipment. Because both of these resources are essential for pursuing our goals, many failed resolutions are due to the lack of either time or money, or both.

When talking about a failed resolution in the past, I’ve showed in my own research
that we should focus on how lack of money contributed to this failure, rather than
lack of time. In my 2024 study, people read about fictional as well as real panel participants who failed either due to lack of money or lack of time. Most participants felt the person whose failure was caused by lack of money would have more self-control going forward and was going to be more reliable at pursuing their goals.

This effect occurred because lack of money is seen as something that cannot be controlled very easily, so if this caused the failure, there wasn’t very much the person who failed could have done about it.

In this research, most of the failed resolutions were related to weight loss, better eating, or working out in the gym. Participants felt the same whether the person who failed was a man or a woman, presumably because it’s plausible that everyone needs some time and some money to pursue various goals regardless of gender or the specific resolution.

The role of controllability takes a different form when it comes to thinking about how we can do better next time.

The role of time

Research also shows the way we view time matters when it comes to failure. For the past, it’s better to think about things outside of our control that can help to take the negativity out of failure and bolster the belief that we can do better. This can mean, for example, to consider how our failure was due to lack of money or other resources outside of our control.

For the future, however, take an active perspective on time. Look at your schedule and make active decisions how to allocate time to your goal pursuit, by scheduling gym sessions or blocking time to prepare healthy meals. This can help to give us the motivation to try again because we’re not victims of our busy schedules.

Woman flopped over an exercise ball in living room.
Definitely not the only one.
Lopolo/Shutterstock

A study published in October 2025 that focused on how a lack of time contributed to failures showed that people can get back a sense of control by talking about “making time”, instead of “having time”. People who discussed their failures as an issue of not having made the time felt like they could do things differently in the future, and were more motivated to do so.

This is because “making time” suggests active control over one’s time and schedule, instead of “having time” that leaves us passive. For example, if you say you didn’t make the time to work out, that means you can make the time in the future if you choose to do so. In contrast, if you say you didn’t have time to work out, it feels like this lack of time is outside of your control and could happen again, preventing you from pursuing your exercise goals.

Find the joy

Another reason so many people struggle to keep to their new year resolution may be because they were too ambitious, or they neglected that joy and pleasure keep us going.

We need not only to have a goal in mind. Finding joy in the journey and belief in the ability to change is also important. For example, someone might want to get in better shape and work out more, but when they actually try to go to the gym, they lack the confidence to sign up for a class. Without some fun, it’s hard to follow through on a resolution even if we really want to pursue the goal. So, try to think of ways you can make the goal more enjoyable to work on and remind yourself you are capable.

The trend for new year resolutions isn’t a bad thing in itself. Although it might seem a bit paradoxical to start virtuous habits right after a big night with alcohol and overeating, research shows that we can indeed benefit from the “fresh-start” effect in which a new beginning in the calendar can provide a clean slate to start better habits.

But we don’t have to wait for the calendar to give us a fresh start. We can choose to make our own resolution (maybe a Valentine’s or Easter resolution?) to boost the motivation to pursue our goals.

The Conversation

Janina Steinmetz does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. What to do if you fail at your new year resolution – https://theconversation.com/what-to-do-if-you-fail-at-your-new-year-resolution-271050

Inside Uganda’s video halls, ‘video jokers’ transform Hollywood blockbusters into local entertainment

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Damien Pollard, Assistant Professor in Film, Northumbria University, Northumbria University, Newcastle

If you walk into a video hall in Uganda your attention will probably go straight to a person sitting at the front of the audience. Speaking rapidly into a microphone, they comment loudly and continuously, often drowning out the sound of the film itself. You may well ask who this person is, and why they keep interfering with the film that people have come to watch.

I’ve been conducting research into Uganda’s film landscape for the last couple of years and I’ve been privileged to visit several different venues where movies are screened. Uganda has few cinemas – there are only three in the capital city, Kampala, with a total of ten screens. Instead, the country has an extensive network of video halls, known locally as bibandas.

Video halls are found throughout the country, particularly in outlying urban areas and entrance is relatively cheap; typically around 1,000 Ugandan shillings, or 21 British pence (a cinema ticket, meanwhile, usually costs around 20,000 shillings or a little over £4). Inside a video hall, benches or seats are laid out in front of televisions and films are screened throughout the day. These are often pirated works from the US, India, Nigeria, Korea, China and elsewhere. Some of the film industry players that I have met during my research estimate that there could be as many as 3,000 video halls in Uganda.

Video hall owners have always had a problem, though. Despite Uganda’s history as a British colony, English is not spoken fluently by everyone. Neither are Hindi, Mandarin, Cantonese or Korean. In the 1980s, the “video joker” (VJ) emerged as a solution and soon became a key feature of the video hall.

The VJ sits at the front of the audience with a microphone and a sound mixer. Talking over the film, they explain its plot and paraphrase the dialogue in the Ugandan language appropriate to the location in which they are working (in Kampala this would generally be Luganda).

Importantly, the VJ’s version of what characters are saying and what is happening in the film may diverge significantly from the original version. They are known to give characters and locations Ugandan names, for example, and most interject hyperbole, jokes and social or moral commentary into their performances.

One of my interviewees told me of a VJ he had seen performing over Christopher Nolan’s 2023 film Oppenheimer, who frequently claimed: “This bomb is big enough to destroy the whole of Africa!” He was amping up the jeopardy (unnecessarily, perhaps) and bringing the film home by using a local frame of reference. The VJ, in other words, can only very loosely be considered a translator. Many of my interviewees likened them more to an MC or a sports commentator – someone who “spices” up a film by adding their own performance to it and keeping the audience “hyped”.

Many VJs are celebrities in Uganda and possess loyal fans who regularly turn out to watch them perform. In fact, the VJ is often more of a draw for audiences than the film they are voicing over. Celebrity VJs have sought to capitalise on their success by selling pirated films on DVD or via streaming platforms with their voice-over tracks baked in, so that their fans can enjoy their work at home.

Even Ugandan televisions stations have experimented with broadcasting foreign content overlaid with VJ tracks. Furthermore, the Kampala-based micro-studio known as Wakaliwood (after Wakaliga, the village where it is based) has raised the profile of the video joker outside of east Africa. It has released two films — Who Killed Captain Alex and Bad Black — on YouTube with an absurdly comic, English-language voice over performed by one of my interviewees, VJ Emmie. Wakaliwood have garnered a global cult following and their work has been screened at festivals and midnight-movie events around the world (sometimes with Emmie performing live).

VJ controversies

Back in Uganda, VJs remain very popular but they’re not without controversy. Their work raises significant issues around intellectual property protection since it relies on the pirating of films. The fact that VJs’ and video halls’ contravention of IP law often goes unpunished in Uganda has been a major stumbling block on the country’s path toward developing a sustainable domestic film production industry.

It’s hard for Ugandan producers to compete with VJs who get their films for free and face few overheads when selling their DVDs to the public. Many Ugandan filmmakers also take issue with the tradition of video joking on aesthetic grounds, arguing that it ruins the integrity of a film and trivialises the audience experience.

Trailer for Once Upon a Time in Uganda! da Wakaliwood Documentary.

The debates around video joking in Uganda won’t be settled soon but the tradition helps us to appreciate two important facts about the exhibition of films. First, what is considered a “normal” way to watch a film varies enormously around the world and is connected to a location’s specific social, cultural and economic context. The way of watching films which is most common in mainstream cinemas in Europe or North America for example, where viewers sit silently in the dark, is only one way of “doing cinema”.

Second, when it comes to our experience of a film, the film itself is only the starting point. Anyone who has ever dressed up and attended a screening of The Rocky Horror Picture Show or The Room will know this too. What those films mean to us has as much to do with the interpersonal experience of watching them as the movie itself. This is perhaps even true when we hold film nights at home, joking with friends as we watch.

So although the VJ is a Ugandan tradition, it has things to tells the rest of the world about the universal experience of watching films.


Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


The Conversation

The research presented in this article was supported by a British Academy/Leverhulme Trust Small Research Grant, awarded to Damien Pollard. Award number: SRG24241338.

ref. Inside Uganda’s video halls, ‘video jokers’ transform Hollywood blockbusters into local entertainment – https://theconversation.com/inside-ugandas-video-halls-video-jokers-transform-hollywood-blockbusters-into-local-entertainment-270126

I grew up in the world’s coldest city without central heating. Here’s what the world can learn from us

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Yangang Xing, Associate Professor, School of Architecture Design and the Built Environment, Nottingham Trent University

On winter mornings in Harbin, where the air outside could freeze your eyelashes, I would wake up on a bed of warm earth.

Harbin, where I grew up, is in northeast China. Winter temperatures regularly dip to -30°C and in January even the warmest days rarely go above -10°C. With about 6 million residents today, Harbin is easily the largest city in the world to experience such consistent cold.

Keeping warm in such temperatures is something I’ve thought about all my life. Long before electric air conditioning and district heating, people in the region survived harsh winters using methods entirely different from the radiators and gas boilers that dominate European homes today.

Now, as a researcher in architecture and construction at a British university, I’m struck by how much we can learn from those traditional systems in the UK. Energy bills are still too high, and millions are struggling to heat their homes, while climate change is expected to make winters more volatile. We need efficient, low-energy ways to stay warm that don’t rely on heating an entire home with fossil fuels.

Some of the answers may lie in the methods I grew up with.

A warm bed made of earth

My earliest memories of winter involve waking up on a “kang” – a heated platform-bed made of earth bricks that has been used in northern China for at least 2,000 years. The kang is less a piece of furniture and more a part of the building itself: a thick, raised slab connected to the family stove in the kitchen. When the stove is lit for cooking, hot air travels through passages running beneath the kang, warming its entire mass.

A traditional Chinese kang bed-stove.
Google Gemini, CC BY-SA

To a child, the kang felt magical: a warm, radiant surface that stayed hot all night long. But as an adult – and now an academic expert – I can appreciate what a remarkably efficient piece of engineering it is.

Unlike central heating, which works by warming the air in every room, only the kang (that is, the bed surface) is heated. The room itself may be cold, but people warm themselves by laying or sitting on the platform with thick blankets. Once warmed, its hundreds of kilograms of compacted earth slowly release heat over many hours. There are no radiators, no need for any pumps, and no unnecessary heating of empty rooms. And since much of the initial heat was generated by fires we’d need for cooking anyway, we saved on fuel.

Maintaining the kang was a family undertaking. My father – a secondary school Chinese literature teacher, not an engineer – became an expert at constructing the kang. Carefully building layers of coal around the fire to keep it alive over the night would be my mum’s job. Looking back, I realise how much skill and labour was involved, and how much trust families placed in a system that required good ventilation to avoid carbon monoxide risks.

But for all its drawbacks, the kang delivered something modern heating systems still struggle to deliver: long-lasting warmth with very little fuel.

Similar approaches across East Asia

Across East Asia, approaches to keeping warm in cold weather evolved around similar principles: keep heat close to the body, and heat only the spaces that matter.

In Korea, the ancient ondol system also channels warm air beneath thick floors, turning the entire floor into a heated surface. Japan developed the kotatsu, a low table covered by a heavy blanket with a small heater underneath to keep your legs warm. They can be a bit costly, but they’re one of the most popular items in Japanese homes.

Clothing was also very important. Each winter my mum would make me a brand new thick padded coat, stuffing it with newly fluffed cotton. It’s one of my loveliest memories.

Europe had similar ideas – then forgot them

Europe once had similar approaches to heating. Ancient Romans heated buildings using hypocausts, for instance, which circulated hot air under floors. Medieval households hung heavy tapestries on walls to reduce drafts, and many cultures used soft cushions, heated rugs or enclosed sleeping areas to conserve warmth.

The spread of modern central heating in the 20th century replaced these approaches with a more energy-intensive pattern: heating entire buildings to a uniform temperature, even when only one person is home. When energy was cheap, this model worked, even despite most European homes (especially those in the UK) being poorly insulated by global standards.

But now that energy is expensive again, tens of millions of Europeans are unable to keep their homes adequately warm. New technologies like heat pumps and renewable energy will help – but they work best when the buildings they heat are already efficient, allowing for lower set point for heating, and higher set points for cooling.

This highlights why traditional approaches to warming homes still have something to teach us. The kang and similar systems show that comfort doesn’t always come from consuming more energy – but from designing warmth more intelligently.

The Conversation

Yangang Xing does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. I grew up in the world’s coldest city without central heating. Here’s what the world can learn from us – https://theconversation.com/i-grew-up-in-the-worlds-coldest-city-without-central-heating-heres-what-the-world-can-learn-from-us-271657

LA fires showed how much neighborliness matters for wildfire safety – schools can do much more to teach it

Source: The Conversation – USA (2) – By Elizabeth A. Logan, Associate Director of the Huntington-USC Institute on California and The West, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences

Eaton fire survivors gather in Altadena, Calif., to talk about recovery six months after the LA fires. Sarah Reingewirtz/MediaNews Group/Los Angeles Daily News via Getty Images

On Jan. 7, 2025, people across the Los Angeles area watched in horror as powerful winds began spreading wildfires through neighborhood after neighborhood. Over three weeks, the fires destroyed more than 16,000 homes and businesses. At least 31 people died, and studies suggest the smoke and stress likely contributed to hundreds more deaths.

For many of us who lived through the fires, it was a traumatic experience that also brought neighborhoods closer together. Neighbors scrambled to help each other as burning embers started spot fires that threatened homes. They helped elderly and disabled residents evacuate.

A man turns a hose on a burning house while another runs.
Samuel Girma runs to get another hose as he and others try to stop the Eaton fire from spreading to more homes in Altadena, Calif. Girma was in the area on a construction job. The other man lives nearby.
Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

As the LA region rebuilds a year later, many people are calling for improvements to zoning regulations, building codes, insurance and emergency communications systems. Conversations are underway about whether rebuilding in some locations makes sense at all.

But managing fire risk is about more than construction practices, regulations and rules. It is also about people and neighborliness – the ethos and practice of caring for those in your community, including making choices and taking steps on your own property to help keep the people around you safe.

Three men, one an older man, stand in the still-smoky ruins of what was once a home, with fire damage all around them.
Neighbors who lost their homes to a fire in Altadena, Calif., on Jan. 9, 2025, talk amid the ruins.
Zoë Meyers/AFP via Getty Images

As LA-area residents and historians who witnessed the fires’ destruction and have been following the recovery closely, we believe building a safer future for fire-risk communities includes increasing neighborliness and building shared knowledge of the past. Much of that starts in the schools.

Neighborliness matters in community fire safety

Being neighborly means recognizing the connectedness of life and addressing the common good, beyond just the individual and family network.

It includes community-wide fire mitigation strategies that can help prevent fires from spreading.

During the Southern California fires, houses, fences, sheds, roofs and dry vegetation served as the fuel for wind-blown fires racing through neighborhoods miles away from forested land. Being neighborly means taking steps to reduce risks on your own property that could put your neighbors at risk. Following fire officials’ recommendations can mean clearing defensible space around homes, replacing fire-prone plants and limiting or removing burnable material, such as wood fencing and sheds.

A woman closes her eyes as she hugs her cat.
Denise Johnson holds her cat Ramsey after the Eaton Fire. Her home was one of the few in her immediate neighborhood that survived, but recovery will take time for everyone.
AP Photo/Jae C. Hong

Neighborliness also recognizes the varying mental health impacts of significant wildfire events on the people who experience them. Being neighborly means listening to survivors and reaching out, particularly to neighbors who may be struggling or need help with recovery, and building community bonds.

Neighbors are often the first people who can help in an emergency before local, state and federal responders arrive. A fast neighborhood response, whether helping put out spot fires on a lawn or ensuring elderly residents or those without vehicles are able to evacuate, can save lives and property in natural disasters.

Fire awareness, neighborliness start in school

Community-based K-12 schools are the perfect places for learning and practicing neighborliness and providing transformative fire education.

Learning about the local history of wildfires, from the ecological impact of beneficial fire to fire disasters and how communities responded, can transform how children and their families think about fires and fire readiness.

However, in our view, fire history and safety is not currently taught nearly enough, even in fire-prone California.

A man pushes an older woman in a shopping cart along a pathway with apartments on one side and sand on the other, and thick smoke behind them.
Jerome Krausse pushes his mother-in-law in a shopping cart on a path along the beach as they evacuate amid fires in Pacific Palisades on Jan. 7, 2025.
AP Photo/Richard Vogel

California’s Department of Education Framework and Content Standards for K-12 education offer several opportunities to engage students with innovative lessons about wildfire causes, preparedness and resilience. For example, fourth grade history and social science standards include understanding “how physical environments (e.g., water, landforms, vegetation, climate) affect human activity.” Middle school science standards include mapping the history of natural hazards, though they only mention forest fires when discussing technology.

Schools could, and we believe should, include more fire history, ecological knowledge and understanding of the interconnectedness of neighborhoods and neighbors when it comes to fire safety in those and other classes.

Elementary schools in many states bring in firefighters to talk about fire safety, often through programs run by groups like the California Fire Prevention Organization. These efforts could spend more time looking beyond house fires to discuss how and where wildfires start, how they spread and how to make your own home and neighborhood much safer.

Models such as the U.S. Fire Administration’s collaboration with Sesame Workshop on the Sesame Street Fire Safety Program for preschool kids offer examples, blending catchy phrases with safety and science lessons.

The National Fire Protection Association’s Sparky the Fire Dog shares some simple steps that kids can do with their parents and friends to help keep their neighborhood safer from wildfire.

Including knowledge from Indigenous tribal elders, fire management professionals and other community members can provide more robust fire education and understanding of the roles people play in fire risk and risk reduction. Introducing students to future career pathways in fire safety and response can also help students see their roles in fire safety.

As LA recovers from the 2025 fires, fire-prone states can prepare for future fires by expanding education about fire and neighborliness, and helping students take that knowledge home to their families.

Remembering, because it will happen again

Neighborliness also demands a pivot from the reflexive amnesia regarding natural and unnatural disasters to knowing that it will happen here again.

There’s a dangerous, stubborn forgetfulness in the vaunted Land of Sunshine. It is all part of the myth that helped make Southern California such a juggernaut of growth from the late 19th century forward.

The region was, boosters and public officials insisted, special: a civilization growing in the benign embrace of the environment. Anything grew here, the endless Los Angeles Basin could absorb everyone, and if there wasn’t enough water to slake the thirst of metropolitan ambitions, engineers and taxpayers would see to it that water from far away – even very far away – would be brought here.

The Southland is beautiful, but a place can be both beautiful and precarious, particularly in the grip of climate change. These are lessons we believe should be taught in K-12 classrooms as an important step toward lowering disaster risk. Living with fire means remembering and understanding the past. That knowledge, and developing more neighborly behavior, can save your life and the lives of your neighbors.

The Conversation

Elizabeth A. Logan receives funding from the Sierra Nevada Conservancy and the WHH Foundation.

William Deverell receives funding from the Sierra Nevada Conservancy and the WHH Foundation.

ref. LA fires showed how much neighborliness matters for wildfire safety – schools can do much more to teach it – https://theconversation.com/la-fires-showed-how-much-neighborliness-matters-for-wildfire-safety-schools-can-do-much-more-to-teach-it-272505

West Coast levee failures show growing risks from America’s aging flood defenses

Source: The Conversation – USA (2) – By Farshid Vahedifard, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University

Days of heavy rain caused a levee on the White River to breach, sending water into Pacific, Wash., on Dec. 16, 2025. Brandon Bell/Getty Images

In recent weeks, powerful atmospheric river storms have swept across Washington, Oregon and California, unloading enormous amounts of rain. As rivers surged, they overtopped or breached multiple levees – those long, often unnoticed barriers holding floodwaters back from homes and towns.

Most of the time, levees don’t demand attention. They quietly do their job, year after year. But when storms intensify, levees suddenly matter in a very personal way. They can determine whether a neighborhood stays dry or ends up underwater.

The damage in the West reflects a nationwide problem that has been building for decades. Across the U.S., levees are getting older while weather is getting more extreme. Many of these structures were never designed for the enormous responsibility they now carry.

A paved bicycling path atop a levee is broken and slabs of asphalt pavement are tilted into a breach where water poured through.
Crews inspect damage to a Green River levee in the Seattle suburbs on Dec. 15, 2025. Thousands of people were urged to evacuate during a series of atmospheric river storms, and the National Guard was sent to monitor and reinforce several levees considered at risk.
AP Photo/Manuel Valdes

As a civil engineer at Tufts University, I study water infrastructure, including the vulnerability of levees and strategies for making them more resilient. My research also shows that when levees fail, the consequences don’t fall evenly on the population.

Levees became critical infrastructure almost by accident

Many people assume levees were built as part of modern, carefully engineered flood-control systems. In reality, many of the levees still in use today began much more humbly.

Decades ago, farmers built simple earthen embankments to protect their fields and livestock from seasonal flooding. These early levees were practical solutions, shaped by experience rather than formal engineering. They were not constructed using rigorous design standards, and they did not follow consistent construction or maintenance guidelines.

Over time, the landscape around these levees changed. Farmland gave way to neighborhoods. Roads, railways, factories and ports expanded into floodplains. Populations grew. What were once modest, local structures protecting farms gradually became the first line of defense for millions of people in homes and workplaces.

During the Great Mississippi Flood of 1927, the river poured over and broke through levees, flooding thousands of square miles of land. Both overtopping and a breach are visible in this photo.
National Weather Service Archival Photography by Steve Nicklas, NOS, NGS

Without much public debate or planning, these semi-engineered levees took on a critical and unintended role. The question that still lingers is whether they were ever prepared for it.

Vast, aging levee system now protecting millions

Today, the National Levee Database counts more than 24,000 miles (38,600 kilometers) of levees in the U.S., with an average age of about 61 years and many of them much older. Together, they protect over 23 million people, around 7 million buildings and nearly US$2 trillion in property value.

That’s an extraordinary level of responsibility for a system that is unevenly maintained with varying oversight. Some levees are inspected regularly. Others are owned by small local agencies or private entities with limited funding. In some cases, responsibility is unclear or fragmented.

One levee that was breached along the Green River in Washington state during storms in mid-December 2025 had been due for repairs for several years, but disagreements among governments had recently held up needed work, The Seattle Times reported. The breach forced thousands of people to evacuate

A map shows many breaches in the Midwest, as well as in Washington state and the Northeast.
Many states have at-risk levees. The map shows all levees in the U.S. National Levee Database (in red) and 478 levee segments where overtopping is known to have occurred in the previous 15 years (in blue).
S. Flynn, et al., 2025

The American Society of Civil Engineers’ 2025 Report Card for American Infrastructure, which I contributed to, gave the nation’s levees a D-plus grade, citing aging infrastructure, inconsistent monitoring and long-term underinvestment. A new dataset that colleagues and I created of levee damage includes 487 cases where rivers poured over levees, known as overtopping, in the past 15 years. That doesn’t mean levees are failing everywhere; it means that many are operating with little margin for error.

How levees fail

Levee failures are rarely sudden collapses. More often, they start quietly.

The most common reason levees fail is overtopping, when water from a river, stream or lake behind the levee flows over the top. Once that happens, erosion can begin on the landward side, weakening the structure from behind. What starts as a slow trickle can quickly grow into a breach, creating a large gap in the levee where water can pour in.

Two illustrations. One of overtopping points out that age, height and the materials used can weaken the levee, leading to a breach, which cuts into the levee allowing a faster, deeper steam of water to pour through.
An illustration shows the difference between overtopping and a breach, and some of the reasons a levee can fail.
S. Flynn et al., 2025

Atmospheric river storms make the risk of overtopping and breaches much higher. These storms deliver enormous amounts of rainfall across wide areas in a matter of hours, often combined with snowmelt. Rivers rise faster and stay high longer. Many levees were never designed for that kind of sustained pressure.

When a levee breaches, flooding can be rapid and deep, leaving little time for evacuation and causing damage that spreads far beyond the floodplain.

Who relies on levees today?

Millions of Americans live and work in area protected by levees, often without realizing it. Homes, schools, highways, rail corridors, ports and power facilities depend on the integrity of these structures.

A recent national study found that across the contiguous U.S., urban expansion into floodplains occurred more than twice as fast after levee construction as it did in surrounding counties, highlighting how levees can affect communities’ perception of danger.

In fact, when levees fail, flooding can be worse than in areas without levees, because water rushes in quickly and drains slowly.

The risks are also uneven, shaped by history, economics and policy decisions.

That reality became painfully clear during an atmospheric river storm in March 2023 when a levee along California’s Pajaro River failed, flooding the town of Pajaro. Pajaro is home to many low-income farmworkers. Floodwaters forced hundreds of residents to evacuate, and some people were trapped as water levels rose.

How the Pajaro Valley flooded after intense rainfall from an atmospheric river in March 2023, breaching a levee protecting a small California town.

What made the disaster especially troubling was what emerged afterward. Officials and engineers had known for decades that the Pajaro River levee was vulnerable. Reports documented its weaknesses, but repairs were repeatedly delayed.

Interviews by The Los Angeles Times and public records showed that part of the reason was financial. Decision-makers did not prioritize investing in a levee system protecting the low-income community. The risk was known, but the protection was deferred.

Pajaro is not an isolated case. Across the country, disadvantaged communities and communities of color are more likely to rely on older levees or levees that are not part of major federal programs. Rural towns often depend on agricultural levees. Urban neighborhoods may rely on structures built for a much smaller population.

When levees fail, the impacts cascade, closing roads, knocking out power, contaminating water supplies and disrupting lives for years.

A map shows highest disparities in Idaho, Utah, Colorado, Iowa, Ohio, Tennessee, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Maine, Massachusetts and Vermont.
Disparity refers to the percentage of each state’s residents protected by levees who are considered disadvantaged, based on the U.S. Council on Environmental Quality’s Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool. All levees in the National Levee Database are counted.
F. Vahedifard et al., 2023

Why this moment matters

Advances in engineering, monitoring and risk assessment have improved how levees are evaluated and designed.

Hurricane Katrina marked a turning point in 2005 when its storm surge broke through levees protecting New Orleans. Hundreds of people died in the flooding. The disaster exposed the consequences of neglect and fragmented responsibility for levee upkeep.

At the same time, there has been real progress. Over the past two decades, significant federal investments have strengthened the condition and management of many of the nation’s levees, particularly through the work of federal agencies such as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Still, the legacy of decisions made decades ago remains, and climate change is raising the risks. Heavier rainfall, fast snowmelt and rising seas are pushing water control systems beyond what many levees were designed to handle. Events once considered rare are becoming more frequent.

As atmospheric rivers test levees in the West and flood risks grow nationwide, the challenge is no longer just technical. It’s about how society values protection, communicates risk and decides whose safety is prioritized.

Levees will continue to play a vital role in protecting communities. Understanding their history, and their limits, is essential as the storms of the future arrive.

The Conversation

Farshid Vahedifard received funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). He is affiliated with the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH).

ref. West Coast levee failures show growing risks from America’s aging flood defenses – https://theconversation.com/west-coast-levee-failures-show-growing-risks-from-americas-aging-flood-defenses-272556

À pierre-feuille-ciseaux, nos cerveaux peinent à agir au hasard… et c’est plus important qu’il n’y paraît

Source: The Conversation – in French – By Denise Moerel, Research Fellow in Cognitive Neuroscience, Western Sydney University

Une étude révèle que nos choix en compétition sont influencés par les manches précédentes, même lorsque s’appuyer sur le passé peut nuire à notre stratégie.


Il existe une stratégie optimale pour gagner plusieurs manches de pierre-feuille-ciseaux : être aussi aléatoire et imprévisible que possible ; ne pas tenir compte de ce qui s’est passé lors de la manche précédente. Mais c’est plus facile à dire qu’à faire.

Pour comprendre comment le cerveau prend des décisions en situation de compétition, nous avons demandé à des participants de jouer 15 000 parties de shifumi, tout en enregistrant leur activité cérébrale.

Nos résultats, publiés dans Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, confirmaient que ceux qui se laissaient influencer par les manches précédentes avaient effectivement tendance à perdre plus souvent. Nous avons également montré que les humains peinent à véritablement agir de manière aléatoire, et que l’on peut discerner divers biais dans leur activité cérébrale lorsqu’ils prennent des décisions dans un contexte compétitif.

Ce que l’on peut apprendre d’un jeu simple

Le domaine des neurosciences sociales s’est surtout attaché à étudier le cerveau d’individus pris isolément. Pourtant, pour comprendre comment notre cerveau prend des décisions lorsque nous interagissons en société, il faut recourir à une méthode appelée « hyperscanning ». Cette méthode permet aux chercheurs d’enregistrer l’activité cérébrale de deux personnes ou plus pendant qu’elles interagissent, offrant ainsi une mesure du comportement social plus proche des situations réelles.

Jusqu’à présent, la plupart des travaux utilisant cette approche se sont concentrés sur la coopération. Lorsqu’on coopère avec quelqu’un, il est utile d’agir de la manière la plus prévisible possible afin de faciliter l’anticipation des actions et des intentions de chacun.

De notre côté, nous nous sommes intéressés à la prise de décision en situation de compétition, où l’imprévisibilité peut conférer un avantage — comme lorsqu’on joue à pierre-feuille-ciseaux. Comment notre cerveau prend-il des décisions, et garde-t-il la trace des actions précédentes, à la fois les nôtres et celles de l’autre joueur ?

Pour explorer ces questions, nous avons enregistré simultanément l’activité cérébrale de paires de participants pendant qu’ils jouaient 480 manches de shifumi l’un contre l’autre sur ordinateur. Soit un total de 15 000 manches à partir duquel nous avons constaté que les joueurs peinaient à rester imprévisibles lorsqu’il s’agissait de choisir l’option suivante.

Même si la meilleure stratégie est d’agir de manière aléatoire, la plupart des personnes présentaient un biais net, en jouant trop souvent l’une des options. Plus de la moitié des joueurs privilégiaient « pierre », suivie de « feuille », tandis que « ciseaux » était l’option la moins choisie.

Par ailleurs, les participants avaient tendance à éviter de répéter leurs choix : ils optaient pour une option différente à la manche suivante plus souvent que ce que le hasard seul aurait permis d’attendre.

Des décisions en temps réel

Nous pouvions prédire la décision d’un joueur — choisir « pierre », « feuille » ou « ciseaux » — à partir de ses données cérébrales avant même qu’il n’ait donné sa réponse. Cela signifie que nous pouvions suivre le processus de prise de décision dans le cerveau à mesure qu’il se déroulait, en temps réel.

Nous avons non seulement trouvé dans le cerveau des informations sur la décision à venir, mais aussi sur ce qui s’était produit lors de la partie précédente. Le cerveau contenait des informations à la fois sur la réponse précédente du joueur et sur celle de son adversaire durant cette phase de prise de décision.

Cela montre que, lorsque nous prenons des décisions, nous utilisons des informations sur ce qui s’est passé auparavant pour orienter la suite : « il a joué pierre la dernière fois, alors que dois-je faire ? »

Nous ne pouvons pas nous empêcher d’essayer de prédire ce qui va se passer ensuite en regardant en arrière.

Or, lorsqu’il s’agit d’être imprévisible, s’appuyer sur les résultats passés est contre-productif. Seuls les cerveaux des joueurs qui ont perdu la partie contenaient des informations sur la manche précédente — ceux des gagnants n’en contenaient pas. Cela montre qu’une dépendance excessive aux résultats passés nuit bel et bien à la stratégie.

Pourquoi est-ce important ?

Qui n’a jamais souhaité savoir ce que son adversaire allait jouer ensuite ? Des jeux les plus simples à la politique internationale, une bonne stratégie peut offrir un avantage décisif. Nos travaux montrent que notre cerveau n’est pas un ordinateur : nous cherchons spontanément à prédire ce qui va se passer ensuite et nous nous appuyons sur les résultats passés pour guider nos décisions futures, même lorsque cela peut s’avérer contre-productif.

Bien sûr, pierre-feuille-ciseaux est l’un des jeux les plus simples qui soient — ce qui en faisait un bon point de départ pour cette recherche. Les prochaines étapes consisteront à transposer nos travaux à des contextes compétitifs où il est plus stratégique de tenir compte des décisions passées.

Notre cerveau est mauvais lorsqu’il s’agit d’être imprévisible. C’est généralement une bonne chose dans la plupart des contextes sociaux, et cela peut nous aider lorsque nous coopérons. En situation de compétition, en revanche, cela peut nous desservir.

En définitive, on peut en tirer une leçon simple : ceux qui cessent de trop analyser le passé ont peut-être davantage de chances de gagner à l’avenir.

The Conversation

Manuel Varlet a reçu des financements de l’Australian Research Council.

Tijl Grootswagers a reçu des financements de l’Australian Research Council.

Denise Moerel ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d’une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n’a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.

ref. À pierre-feuille-ciseaux, nos cerveaux peinent à agir au hasard… et c’est plus important qu’il n’y paraît – https://theconversation.com/a-pierre-feuille-ciseaux-nos-cerveaux-peinent-a-agir-au-hasard-et-cest-plus-important-quil-ny-parait-269438

L’histoire édifiante du premier loup d’Éthiopie jamais capturé, soigné puis réintroduit dans la nature

Source: The Conversation – in French – By Sandra Lai, Postdoctoral Researcher, Ethiopian Wolf Conservation Programme, University of Oxford

Blessé par balle dans les montagnes d’Éthiopie, un loup d’Éthiopie a survécu contre toute attente. Son sauvetage, inédit, a changé bien plus que son destin individuel.


Quelle est la valeur d’un seul animal ? Lorsqu’un animal sauvage est retrouvé grièvement blessé, l’option la plus humaine consiste souvent à pratiquer l’euthanasie pour lui éviter des souffrances prolongées. C’est le plus souvent ce qui se passe, parfois à bon escient. Car quand on réunit les moyens nécessaires pour le sauver, un animal ainsi réhabilité puis réintroduit dans la nature peut être rejeté par son groupe, peiner à trouver de la nourriture ou à échapper aux prédateurs. Et même s’il survit, il peut ne pas se reproduire et ne laisser aucune empreinte durable sur la population.

Mais il arrive parfois qu’un cas isolé montre qu’une intervention peut faire bien davantage que sauver la vie d’un individu. Elle peut aussi transformer notre idée de ce qui est possible.

C’est l’histoire d’une seconde chance qui s’est jouée dans les Monts Simien, en Éthiopie. Là-bas, à 3 000 mètres d’altitude, l’oxygène se fait plus rare. Les nuits sont froides, et la vie n’offre que peu de répit. C’est aussi le territoire du loup d’Éthiopie (Canis simensis), le principal prédateur de cet habitat et le carnivore le plus menacé d’Afrique. Il ne reste plus guère que 500 loups adultes dans les hauts plateaux éthiopiens, dont environ 60 à 70 dans les Monts Simien.

Début mai 2020, l’un d’entre eux a subi une blessure grave — une fracture du fémur causée par un tir d’arme à feu. Parce qu’il n’était plus capable de suivre sa meute dans les hautes terres implacables, son sort semblait scellé. Habituellement, l’histoire s’arrête là. Mais cette fois-ci, il en a été autrement.

Je suis chercheuse en postdoctorat au sein de l’Ethiopian Wolf Conservation Programme, un programme qui se consacre depuis trente ans à la protection du loup d’Éthiopie et de son habitat montagnard. J’ai eu l’honneur de faire partie de l’équipe qui a documenté, pour la toute première fois, le sauvetage d’un loup d’Éthiopie, son traitement clinique en captivité, puis sa remise en liberté réussie après réhabilitation.

Terefe, le survivant chanceux

Des gardes du parc ont découvert le loup étendu sous un pont et ont alerté Getachew Assefa, chef de l’équipe de suivi des loups du Ethiopian Wolf Conservation Programme dans le parc national des monts Simien.

Il est rare qu’un loup d’Éthiopie soit abattu à l’intérieur du parc. Les autorités éthiopiennes chargées de la faune sauvage et l’Ethiopian Wolf Conservation Programme ont donc décidé de capturer l’animal, effrayé, et de tenter de le sauver.

Il s’agissait d’une démarche sans précédent, aucun loup d’Éthiopie n’ayant jamais été maintenu en captivité auparavant. La décision de le sauver reposait à la fois sur l’origine humaine de sa blessure et sur le faible nombre de loups encore présents dans le massif du Simien.

Un petit refuge de montagne a rapidement été transformé en enclos de fortune pour l’accueillir. C’est là que, pendant les 51 jours suivants, sa réhabilitation s’est déroulée.

Durant ces quelques semaines, il a reçu des soins vétérinaires intensifs, sous la supervision d’experts. Il a été pris en charge par Chilot Wagaye, garde issu de la communauté locale. Les progrès ont d’abord été incertains, puis les os fracturés ont commencé à se ressouder et, au bout d’un mois, le loup a pu se tenir debout seul.

On le baptisa alors Terefe, un nom qui signifie « survivant chanceux » en amharique, la langue locale.

Retour à l’état sauvage : une histoire d’espoir

Une fois sa patte rétablie, l’impatience de Terefe à quitter le refuge est vite devenue manifeste. La nuit, il hurlait, sans doute pour tenter d’appeler les membres de sa meute.

Fin juin 2020, il a été relâché près de son groupe, équipé d’un collier GPS léger — le tout premier jamais posé sur un loup d’Éthiopie. Ce dispositif a permis aux chercheurs de suivre ses déplacements et d’explorer une question cruciale : un loup réhabilité peut-il se réintégrer dans la nature ?

L’Ethiopian Wolf Conservation Programme a suivi les déplacements de Tefere après la guérison de sa blessure afin de s’assurer qu’il allait bien.

Peu après sa remise en liberté, les observations ont confirmé que Terefe avait été réintégré au sein de sa meute. Il est resté plusieurs semaines dans son territoire d’origine. Mais il a ensuite commencé à se déplacer plus largement dans les montagnes, rendant parfois visite à des meutes voisines, avant de finir par s’établir près du village de Shehano.

D’abord, les habitants ont été surpris de voir un loup s’approcher ainsi de leurs maisons et ils ont tenté de le chasser. Mais les agents de suivi, dirigés par Getachew et Chilot, leur ont raconté l’histoire de Terefe.

De cette meilleure compréhension a découlé une évolution des attitudes. Les villageois se sont alors montrés plus enclins à protéger Terefe… et les nouveaux membres de sa meute. Car le loup avait trouvé une partenaire et le couple avait donné naissance à une portée de louveteaux.

Un sauvetage historique qui a protégé bien plus qu’une vie

Aujourd’hui, la « meute de Terefe » existe toujours. Terefe a non seulement survécu, mais il a aussi laissé une descendance. Il a également modifié quelque chose de fondamental, mais difficile à mesurer : les perceptions locales. Les loups sont parfois considérés comme une menace. Avec Terefe, ils sont devenus un symbole de résilience et une source de fierté.

L’histoire de Terefe ne signifie pas que chaque animal sauvage blessé peut ou doit être sauvé. Mais lorsque l’intervention est menée avec rigueur, une seule vie peut avoir une portée bien plus grande qu’on ne l’imagine — non seulement pour une espèce menacée, mais aussi pour les populations qui vivent à ses côtés. Aujourd’hui, Getachew me répète souvent que personne n’oserait plus faire de mal à Terefe.

Sa notoriété protégera-t-elle les membres de sa meute lorsqu’il ne sera plus là ? Protègera-t-elle d’autres individus de son espèce ? Terefe a été sauvé d’une blessure infligée par la main de l’homme, alors que de nombreux autres loups disparaissent lentement et silencieusement, victimes de la rage et de la maladie de Carré transmises par les chiens domestiques — une conséquence indirecte de la présence humaine dans les montagnes.

L’histoire de Terefe rappelle toutefois que les efforts de conservation ne sont jamais aussi efficaces que lorsqu’ils sont menés de concert avec les communautés locales. Elle laisse entrevoir l’étendue de ce que l’on peut accomplir lorsque des personnes attachées à un même territoire unissent leurs forces.

The Conversation

Sandra Lai ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d’une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n’a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.

ref. L’histoire édifiante du premier loup d’Éthiopie jamais capturé, soigné puis réintroduit dans la nature – https://theconversation.com/lhistoire-edifiante-du-premier-loup-dethiopie-jamais-capture-soigne-puis-reintroduit-dans-la-nature-272622

What loving-kindness meditation is and how to practice it in the new year

Source: The Conversation – USA (3) – By Jeremy David Engels, Liberal Arts Endowed Professor of Communication, Penn State

Loving-kindness, the feeling cultivated in metta meditation, is very different from romantic love. Anna Sunderland Engels

A popular New Year’s resolution is to take up meditation – specifically mindfulness meditation. This is a healthy choice.

Regular mindfulness practice has been linked to many positive health benefits, including reduced stress and anxiety, better sleep and quicker healing after injury and illness. Mindfulness can help us to be present in a distracted world and to feel more at home in our bodies, and in our lives.

There are many different types of meditation. Some mindfulness practices ask meditators simply to sit with whatever thoughts, sensations or emotions arise without immediately reacting to them. Such meditations cultivate focus, while granting more freedom in how we respond to whatever events life throws at us.

Other meditations ask practitioners to deliberately focus on one emotion – for example, gratitude or love – to deepen the experience of that emotion. The purpose behind this type of meditation is to bring more gratitude, or more love, into one’s life. The more people meditate on love, the easier it is to experience this emotion even when not meditating.

One such meditation is known as “metta,” or loving-kindness. As a scholar of communication and mindfulness, as well as a longtime meditation teacher, I have both studied and practiced metta. Here is what loving-kindness means and how to try it out for yourself:

Unbounded, universal love

Loving-kindness, or metta, is the type of love which is practiced by Buddhists around the world. Like many forms of meditation today, there are both secular and religious forms of the practice. One does not need to be a Buddhist to practice loving-kindness. It is for anyone and everyone who wants to live more lovingly.

Loving-kindness, the feeling cultivated in metta meditation, is very different from romantic love. In the ancient Pali language, the word “metta” has two root meanings: The first is “gentle,” in the sense of a gentle spring rain that falls on young plants, nourishing them without discrimination. The second is “friend.”

Metta is limitless and unbounded love; it is gentle presence and universal friendliness. Metta practice is meant to grow people’s ability to be present for themselves and others without fail.

A guided loving-kindness meditation practice.

Metta is not reciprocal or conditional. It does not discriminate between us and them, rich and poor, educated and uneducated, popular or unpopular, worthy and unworthy. To practice metta is to give what I describe in my research as “the rarest and most precious gift” – a gift of love offered without any expectation of it being returned.

How to practice loving-kindness meditation

In the fifth century, a Sri Lankan monk, Buddhaghosa, composed an influential meditation text called the “Visuddhimagga,” or “The Path of Purification.” In this text, Buddhaghosa provides instructions for how to practice loving-kindness meditation. Contemporary teachers tend to adapt and modify his instructions.

The practice of loving-kindness often involves quietly reciting to oneself several traditional phrases designed to evoke metta, and visualizing the beings who will receive that loving-kindness.

Traditionally, the practice begins by sending loving kindness to ourselves. It is typical during this meditation to say:

May I be filled by loving-kindness

May I be safe from inner and outer dangers
May I be well in body and mind

May I be at ease and happy

After speaking these phrases, and feeling the emotions they evoke, next it’s common to direct loving-kindness toward someone – or something – else: It can be a beloved person, a dear friend, a pet, an animal, a favorite tree. The phrases become:

May you be filled by loving-kindness

May you be safe from inner and outer dangers

May you be well in body and mind

May you be at ease and happy

Next, this loving-kindness is directed to a wider circle of friends and loved ones: “May they …”

The final step is to gradually expand the circle of well wishes: including the people in our community and town, people everywhere, animals and all living beings, and the whole Earth. This last round of recitation begins: “May we …”

In this way, loving-kindness meditation practice opens the heart further and further into life, beginning with the meditator themselves.

Loving-kindness and mindful democracy

Clinical research shows that loving-kindness meditation has a positive effect on mental health, including lessening anxiety and depression, increasing life satisfaction and improving self-acceptance while reducing self-criticism. There is also evidence that loving-kindness meditation increases a sense of connection with other people.

The benefits of loving-kindness meditation are not just for the individual. In my research, I show that there are also tremendous benefits for society as a whole. Indeed, the practice of democracy requires us to work together with friends, strangers and even purported “opponents.” This is difficult to do if our hearts are full of hatred and resentment.

Each time meditators open their hearts in metta meditation, they prepare themselves to live more loving lives: for their own selves, and for all living beings.

The Conversation

Jeremy David Engels does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. What loving-kindness meditation is and how to practice it in the new year – https://theconversation.com/what-loving-kindness-meditation-is-and-how-to-practice-it-in-the-new-year-270984