A staircase in a small, decorative arts museum tells a harrowing story of terror, abuse and enslavement

Source: The Conversation – USA (2) – By Susanna Ashton, Professor of English, Clemson University

A monument to survival and perseverance has survived, by happenstance, to share its stories today. Courtesy of the Museum of Early Southern Decorative Arts (MESDA) at Old Salem

From the ages of 12 to about 22, Harriet Jacobs lived under the watch of her enslaver, a wealthy physician named James Norcom Sr. During that decade, as Jacobs grew from a child to a young woman, Norcom psychologically and physically terrorized her.

Once, when she was a teenager, he threw her down the stairs of his Edenton, North Carolina house. He swore it would never happen again. But as Jacobs later wrote, “I knew that he would forget his promise.”

Jacobs’ injuries took weeks to heal. Even after they did, she made sure nobody would forget what happened by including this harrowing moment in her 1861 autobiographical novel, “Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself,” one of the most important testimonies of captivity and survival ever written.

In July 2025, we stumbled across the staircase during a visit to the Museum of Early Southern Decorative Arts in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, an institution known for its preeminent collections of paintings, pottery, furniture and fine exhibits on Southern artisans and early American craft.

Elderly mulatto woman sitting in a large wooden chair with exquisite carvings.
A portrait of Harriet Jacobs taken in 1894, three years before her death.
Journal of the Civil War Era

We’d gone there to see a table that belonged to a formerly enslaved writer named Samuel “Aleckson” Williams. But our attention was ultimately drawn several rooms away from the table, where we encountered woodwork – including the staircase Jacobs had written about – from the house where Norcom had enslaved her.

As scholars of 19th-century U.S. literature who regularly teach Jacobs’ “Incidents,” we were stunned to realize that the staircase had survived.

It caught us even more off guard because Jacobs’ life has been receiving a lot of attention from scholars. For decades, Jacobs’ book was read as a work of fiction, if it was even remembered at all. But in recent years, historians have recovered her papers and confirmed a number of biographical details. In 2024, a narrative written by her brother, John Jacobs, was republished.

For us, the experience highlighted the importance of these small, regional museums. The staircase hadn’t originally been salvaged due to its connection to Jacobs. But it had nonetheless been conserved and cared for, which allowed new meanings to slowly emerge.

A daring escape

In 1964, the Jacobs staircase – along with a door, a mantle and paneling – were taken from Norcom’s house in Edenton not because of their connection to Jacobs or her enslaver, but because of their significance to Revolutionary-era craftsmanship.

We weren’t the first to realize the staircase’s connection to Jacobs. Roughly 15 years ago, curator Robert Leath brought it to the attention of Anthony Parent, a history professor at Wake Forest University. Parent publicized the story of these material objects through local outreach and some scholarship.

But like many histories that emerge from unexpected places, the story of the staircase hasn’t gained much traction in broader conversations among Jacobs scholars, much less in popular memory and national history.

Across “Incidents,” Jacobs chronicles many moments of physical and psychological abuse. But the assault on the stairs stands out among the many acts of terror she endured.

“He had pitched me down stairs in a fit of passion,” she writes, “and the injury I received was so serious that I was unable to turn myself in bed for many days.”

Jacobs eventually fled her bondage and exchanged her life in captivity under Norcom for a life of quasi-freedom: She spent seven years hiding in a nearby attic. Eventually she made her way to the North, where she claimed her freedom and published her book.

Rediscovered in the 1970s, Jacobs’ story was so astonishing that some readers doubted its autobiographical accuracy. But historian Jean Yellin was able to verify many aspects of her narrative, including the fact that she had hidden in an attic for seven years.

Yellin’s revelations of Jacobs’ life and work – in addition to the harrowing experiences of other women held in captivity – helped change the way Americans have been able to learn about how women, both enslaved and free, survive coercion and sexual violence.

Hidden in plain sight

At the Museum of Early Southern Decorative Arts, the staircase appears in between two separate galleries. On the wall along the steps to the first landing, a framed photograph of Harriet Jacobs and a framed copy of the first edition of “Incidents” hang. Though visitors are allowed to ascend the stairs, they don’t lead anywhere. In the next room are the mantel and wood paneling from the Norcom house.

The museum’s website doesn’t include a write-up of the Jacobs staircase, nor does it showcase an image of the impressive installation, although it’s cataloged with care – and, thanks in part to Parent’s advocacy, generations of students have visited the museum to see what survives of Jacobs’ house.

The museum staff recounted the story of the staircase to us in the course of a conversation about Williams. They, too, believe that the stories behind objects have a way of enduring, even as the importance and meaning of artifacts change over time.

A sign reading 'Harriet Jacobs: fugitive slave, writer, and abolitionist. 'Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl' depicts her early life. Lived in Edenton.'
Harriet Jacobs was enslaved in Edenton, N.C., as an adolescent.
Jed Record/flickr, CC BY

Stories that unfold in surprising ways

The installation at the Museum of Early Southern Decorative Arts demonstrates the power of regional museums to preserve artifacts whose stories unfold over generations – whose meaning may not rest on the reasons they are salvaged, purchased or preserved, and whose significance might seem to be an accident in hindsight. These stories matter, even – and especially – when they played a role in the most violent chapters in U.S. history.

Jacobs’ staircase was valuable when it was acquired; it was understood then as an example of fine 18th-century craftsmanship, and that’s a story worth preserving and learning. And yet its story now has more chapters that enrich the narrative.

As the Trump administration is reassessing “troubling” ideological content at the Smithsonian and elsewhere – slashing grants and budgets and even advocating for the removal or reconstruction of exhibits that tell difficult stories – we think it’s important to look anew at how museums preserve objects and the acts of survival they carry forward.

This isn’t a story of discovery and recovery. Instead, our experience simply demonstrates why museums, archives and libraries matter. These institutions require space to play the long game, in ways no one can anticipate, so they can continue doing what they do best: collect, preserve, document and curate.

In doing so, they allow stories like Jacobs’ to unfold in remarkable and utterly unforeseeable ways.

The Conversation

The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. A staircase in a small, decorative arts museum tells a harrowing story of terror, abuse and enslavement – https://theconversation.com/a-staircase-in-a-small-decorative-arts-museum-tells-a-harrowing-story-of-terror-abuse-and-enslavement-263976

How Dorothea Tanning’s ‘Birthday’ painting challenged male-dominated surrealism

Source: The Conversation – USA (2) – By Sally Jane Brown, Curator, West Virginia University

Do the seemingly endless doorways represent a woman trapped in domesticity or infinite ways out? Philadelphia Museum of Art

When American artist Dorothea Tanning painted “Birthday” in 1942, she announced her arrival – an artistic birth, as she later described it – into the surrealist movement.

Surrealism is an avant-garde art and literary movement that began in Paris in the 1920s and sought to unleash the unconscious mind. Women artists within the movement often drew on its dreamlike language to counter male surrealists’ idealized and objectifying portrayals of women, reclaiming their own agency and identity.

The movement’s centennial will be celebrated during the Philadelphia Museum of Art’s “Dreamworld: Surrealism at 100” exhibition, which opens Nov. 8, 2025, and runs through Feb. 16, 2026.

As an artist, writer and curator who focuses on feminism in art history, I’m excited to see Tanning’s “Birthday” displayed in Philadelphia alongside works by canonical male surrealists such as Salvador Dalí and Joan Miró. This juxtaposition invites viewers to reexamine surrealism through the contributions of women like Tanning, as well as Leonora Carrington and perhaps Remedios Varo.

These women brought radical innovations to the movement. Their depictions of female experiences of sexual awakening, domestic entrapment and psychic resistance added new depth to the dreamscapes envisioned by their male contemporaries.

A steady, unseductive gaze

Vertical oil painting of woman with fantastical creature at her feet in the foreground and a series of open doors in the background
‘Birthday,’ painted by American surrealist Dorothea Tanning in 1942.
Philadelphia Museum of Art

In “Birthday,” the artist paints herself bare-chested and wearing an elaborate skirt composed of flowing, vinelike forms that intertwine with female figures, evoking an organic world somewhere between vegetation and the sea. She stands tall in a corridor lined with doors that seem to recede endlessly. Is she trapped in domesticity, or do the doors represent infinite ways out? She stares off, seemingly at the painter, not the viewer. At her feet is a fantastical winged feline creature, its presence both companionable and uncanny.

The composition has many hallmarks of surrealism, including dream logic – the strange, flowing and often illogical progression of images reflecting the unpredictable nature of dreams – metamorphosis and psychic ambiguity. Psychic ambiguity refers to an open-ended emotional or psychological meaning. It invites multiple interpretations and exudes the complexity of the subconscious.

But what distinguishes “Birthday,” in my view, is its insistence on agency.

Many surrealist artists cast women as muses or dream figures conjured for the male gaze. Tanning, however, places herself at the center. Her steady, unseductive gaze confronts the viewer and demands recognition of her authorship.

French writer and poet André Breton’s 1924 “Manifesto of Surrealism” urged artists to liberate thought from rational constraint. Breton aimed to access the unconscious through dream and automatism, a surrealist technique of creating art without conscious control, allowing spontaneous expression from the subconscious mind, free from rational thought or aesthetic rules.

A fascinating array of doors

Beyond her self-portrait, “Birthday” depicts a seemingly unending series of doorways. Tanning wrote about taking inspiration from her New York apartment:

“I had been struck, one day, by a fascinating array of doors – hall, kitchen, bathroom, studio – crowded together, soliciting my attention with their antic planes, light, shadows, imminent openings and shuttings. From there it was an easy leap to a dream of countless doors.”

The “dream of countless doors” could represent the perpetual potential for change and renewal, or the ability to leave doors open for the imagination, or opportunities beyond domesticity for women.

Tanning refused to be confined by the label of “woman artist,” even as her work bore feminist depth. Nonetheless, her paintings modeled a form of self-determination that continues to resonate in the work of contemporary artists such as South African photographer Zanele Muholi and American mixed-media artist Mickalene Thomas.

Ultimately, “Birthday” is not just a surrealist self-portrait; it is a threshold work. It situates the artist between known and unknown, rational and subconscious, constraint and liberation. For Tanning, it marked her own artistic birth. For viewers today, it marks a reminder that self-representation is not static but always in motion, transforming.

Read more of our stories about Philadelphia and Pennsylvania, or sign up for our Philadelphia newsletter.

The Conversation

Sally Jane Brown does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. How Dorothea Tanning’s ‘Birthday’ painting challenged male-dominated surrealism – https://theconversation.com/how-dorothea-tannings-birthday-painting-challenged-male-dominated-surrealism-264958

La conversación docente: La importancia de la colaboración entre enseñantes

Source: The Conversation – (in Spanish) – By Eva Catalán, Editora de Educación, The Conversation

Zhuravlev Andrey/Shutterstock, CC BY

¿Nos estamos quedando sin docentes? Datos internacionales recientes apuntan a que la profesión resulta cada vez menos atractiva; otros informes europeos muestran que incluso después de haber elegido formarse para enseñar, y haber invertido años y energía en esta tarea, uno de cada tres docentes que empiezan abandonan antes de cumplir cinco años en el trabajo.

Los factores detrás de este fenómeno son muchos; imposible tratarlos todos en este boletín. Thomas André Prola, investigador en la Universidad de Barcelona, ha definido en un reciente estudio las principales áreas de preocupación de la profesión: las tecnologías digitales, la gestión del aula, la comunicación y las relaciones con las familias, la diversidad e inclusión, la colaboración profesional, la cultura escolar, la planificación y el desarrollo curricular.

Pero como explica este experto, todas tienen que ver directa o indirectamente con una necesidad clave de los docentes, en especial de los que empiezan: sentirse acompañados. “El apoyo de un mentor, el respaldo de sus pares y la posibilidad de reflexionar sobre su propia práctica marcan la diferencia entre abandonar o quedarse. En otras palabras, el futuro de la educación también pasa por construir redes de cuidado y aprendizaje compartido”, argumenta. Y ofrece una solución: DigitalTA, una red de profesores de primaria y secundaria, donde uno puede relacionarse con colegas de todo el continente, con más y menos experiencia.

Además de esta valiosa herramienta, comparto en este boletín varios artículos que ofrecen distintas perspectivas sobre la profesión y posibles maneras de hacerla más atractiva y sostenible.

Y como siempre, seleccionamos lo más útil para docentes de lo publicado en las últimas semanas en nuestra sección de educación: una visión geopolítica de las universidades, cómo afrontar el discurso de odio en colegios e institutos,estrategias para mirar críticamente a las tecnologías, y una herramienta gratis para maestros de infantil que permite detectar problemas de adquisición del lenguaje entre los más pequeños.

Muy feliz semana,

The Conversation

ref. La conversación docente: La importancia de la colaboración entre enseñantes – https://theconversation.com/la-conversacion-docente-la-importancia-de-la-colaboracion-entre-ensenantes-266283

New hope for Huntington’s families as gene therapy shows remarkable results

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Åsa Petersén, Professor of Neuroscience, Lund University

kazoka/Shutterstock.com

A company called uniQure has announced promising results from a trial of a new gene therapy for Huntington’s disease. The news has spread quickly through families affected by this condition, who have been desperately waiting for a treatment that can stop or slow down this devastating illness.

Huntington’s disease is a fatal brain disorder that runs in families, caused by a faulty gene that produces a protein called huntingtin. The disease typically begins to cause symptoms in people between 30 and 50 years old.

People with the condition experience problems with movement, thinking abilities and mental health. The disease gets worse over time and typically leads to death about 20 years after symptoms first appear.

In this study, neurosurgeons delivered the treatment called AMT-130 directly into the brain using precise surgery guided by MRI scans. They targeted the striatum – the brain region most damaged by Huntington’s disease.

The treatment requires a single injection delivered during a complex 12- to 20-hour brain operation, which means it will probably be expensive.

AMT-130 uses a modified virus to carry genetic material that can reduce the amount of harmful huntingtin protein in brain cells. Scientists believe this faulty protein plays a key role in causing the disease.

The results showed that patients who received the high dose of AMT-130 (12 people) experienced significant benefits. The treatment appeared to slow disease progression by 75% over 36 months, compared with a carefully matched group of patients who didn’t receive the therapy and were from another study that investigates how the disease develops over time.

Disease progression was measured using a standard scale that tracks movement problems and thinking abilities in Huntington’s disease patients.

The high-dose treatment also showed benefits on another scale that measures how well people can carry out daily activities. Additionally, levels of neurofilament – a substance that indicates brain cell damage – decreased in patients’ spinal fluid after 36 months.

Crucially, the treatment appeared to be safe, and patients tolerated it well. UniQure plans to apply for approval from US regulators in early 2026.

There is an urgent need for treatments that can change the course of Huntington’s disease. Several clinical trials are currently testing ways to target huntingtin and other factors involved in the disease.

Some previous trials have had to be stopped early because of dangerous side-effects, so it’s particularly encouraging that AMT-130 appears safe.

Huntington’s disease explained.

Results need careful interpretation

However, these positive results need to be viewed with some caution. Only 12 patients received the high dose, which is a small number.

Comparing results to an external control group doesn’t account for the placebo effect – the improvement some patients experience simply from believing they’re receiving treatment. There might also be differences in how symptoms are rated between observational studies and treatment trials.

The company hasn’t yet presented results from more objective measures like brain scans or precise movement tests, and the findings have not been independently reviewed by other scientists.

The results show that this method of delivering gene therapy to the brain appears safe, which strengthens the potential for similar treatments – not only for Huntington’s disease but for other brain conditions.

The positive AMT-130 results have certainly created optimism and raised hope among many families living with Huntington’s disease.

Hope is vital for coping with the daily challenges this condition brings. This study, alongside other research happening worldwide, demonstrates the dedication and hard work of the Huntington’s disease community in their fight for new and effective treatments.

The Conversation

Åsa Petersén is affiliated with European Huntington Disease Network as deputy-chair of the executive committee.

ref. New hope for Huntington’s families as gene therapy shows remarkable results – https://theconversation.com/new-hope-for-huntingtons-families-as-gene-therapy-shows-remarkable-results-266158

Consent issues in the Twilight saga extend far beyond Bella and Edward’s age gap

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Emily Hammer, PhD Candidate in Theological Ethics, University of St Andrews

Most debates about the depiction of consent in Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight saga, which turns 20 this month, focus on the age gap between Bella Swan and Edward Cullen. For the uninitiated, Edward is an undead vampire who has been frozen at age 17 for 87 years, and falls in love with 17-year-old human schoolgirl Bella.

However, I want to discuss another question – whether Bella can consent to becoming a vampire (a transformation she begs Edward for throughout the series, and is finally granted in the final novel) at all. Philosopher L.A. Paul calls such decisions “transformative experiences” – choices you can’t fully evaluate beforehand because they will permanently change who you are.

The challenge of the choice to become a vampire or not, an example Paul uses in her book, Transformative Experience (2014), is two-part, according to her transformative experience framework. First, you can’t give the experience of becoming a vampire a personal value because you have no comparable experience (such as changing species). This makes it impossible for you to choose rationally as you would in other choices, by, for example, visualising what it might be like or making a pros and cons list.

Unlike being in a love triangle (albeit with a vampire and a werewolf, the plot of the second Twilight novel, New Moon), becoming a vampire is an irreversible event you can’t test or gather data on.


This article is part of a mini series marking 20 years since the publication of Stephenie Meyer’s first Twilight novel.


Second, given that your preferences will change in ways unknown upon becoming a vampire, you can’t choose which choice – vampire or human – you would prefer. For instance, human Bella enjoys sitting in the sun reading, while her vampire lover looks on from the trees. Vampire Bella might not miss this, however, as she now is consumed by blood-lust.

Consent, or informed consent, a term often associated with sex or medical interventions, considers whether someone is able to agree to something happening to them. A valid consent is one that is informed, voluntary, and capacitous – given by someone who is capable of giving consent.

In Bella’s choice to become a vampire, and in fact most transformative experience choices, capacity and voluntariness are easily established. At 18, Bella has reached the age of majority in Washington state, where she lives, meaning she can make her own autonomous decisions. She does not suffer from any current mental health conditions – her months-long depressive episode in New Moon, from which she has recovered by the time she becomes a vampire, notwithstanding. Her choice is also voluntary. In fact, throughout most of the saga, she is the main person pushing for her vampirism, with Edward and his adopted sister Rosalie being thoroughly opposed.

The issue with consent in transformative experience decisions is with the information. By their very nature, we do not have enough facts to make a rational choice. According to at least one major informed consent framework, this does not satisfy the condition of substantial understanding of “the foreseeable consequences and possible outcomes that might follow as a result of [(not)] performing the action”. The question of whether Bella can consent to becoming a vampire is misleading then.

In fact, all transformative experiences that require a consent transaction are not doing what they purport to be doing, as there is no way to understand what the consequences and possible outcomes will be. The more everyday transactions Paul discusses in her book are: getting a cochlear implant as person who is Deaf from birth, or choosing to have a child. There is a moment of consent, of no return, involved in both of these choices, and as both are transformative experiences, there is a lack of information for you personally making the choice.

The moment Bella turns into a vampire in the film adaptation of Breaking Dawn.

Paul’s solution to this is to reframe the question from choosing, say, vampirism or not vampirism, to choosing “revelation” – or not. “If you choose to undergo a transformative experience and its outcomes,” she writes, “you choose the experience for the sake of discovery itself, even if this entails a future that involves stress, suffering, or pain.”

This is exactly what Bella does. She chooses to become a vampire because she wants to be with Edward forever, something she reveals to him at her prom in the epilogue of the first book.

As comes to light at the end of New Moon, she also wants to protect Edward’s family from the Volturi (the vampire government). She accepts that this means leaving her own loved ones behind. She says: “This was always the hardest part […] The people I would lose, the people I would hurt [by becoming a vampire].”

However, as is the nature of transformative experiences, she ends up being wrong about her assessment of losing people. She gains her daughter Renesmee, her werewolf love interest Jacob sticks around and her dad Charlie is still in her life. In short, the outcomes were not as she feared, in part because she had no data to truly make a rational judgment about them.

So, can Bella consent to becoming a vampire? She can’t consent to vampirism in the usual informed consent sense, and as Paul argues, neither can people making other significant choices. But she can consent to revelation, which reframes what a meaningful transformative choice looks like.


Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


The Conversation

Emily Hammer does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Consent issues in the Twilight saga extend far beyond Bella and Edward’s age gap – https://theconversation.com/consent-issues-in-the-twilight-saga-extend-far-beyond-bella-and-edwards-age-gap-263760

Peru’s gastronomic boom risks excluding the Indigenous people whose food it celebrates

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Belinda Zakrzewska, Assistant Professor of Marketing, University of Birmingham

Peruvians are rightly passionate about food. Their pride in Peruvian cuisine has been fuelled in the past two decades or so by a wave of international culinary awards that has forged sense of belonging and visibility on the world stage. Yet, behind this “gastronationalism” lies a more complex story about inequality and exclusion.

The rise to international prominence of Peruvian cuisine, often referred to as the “gastronomic boom”, started to gather pace in the late 20th century. It was spearheaded by Peruvian chefs who studied or trained abroad and returned to Lima, the capital of Peru, with new culinary ideas.

There is a clear consensus among Peruvians that the pioneer of this movement was Gastón Acurio. He created upscale Peruvian restaurants at a time when Lima’s elite favoured French and Italian restaurants. His efforts extended beyond the kitchen. He published books, was a key figure in organising Mistura (Lima’s first major culinary festival) and co-founded Apega (the society of Peruvian gastronomy). Throughout his endeavours, his message was clear: “Cuisine unites Peruvians in a shared sense of pride and faith in ourselves.”

Acurio’s success inspired a new generation of celebrity chefs, among them chef Virgilio Martínez, owner of Central, and chef Mitsuharu “Micha” Tsumura, owner of Maido. Both restaurants have secured the top spot in the list compiled by industry bible, The World’s 50 Best Restaurants: Central in 2023 and Maido in 2025. This has reinforced Peru’s place on the global culinary map. The South American country has earned the title of the World’s Best Culinary Destination 12 times since 2012 (only missing out in 2020).

Antony Bourdain visits Peru.

Peru’s gastronomic boom offered a powerful unifying narrative in a country whose national identity has been fragmented by class, racial, and ethnic inequalities due to the Spanish colonisation in 1532. Peru’s sense of itself was further shattered by two devastating decades of internal terrorism and economic crisis in the 1980s and 1990s. A recent Ipsos survey has confirmed this, revealing that Peruvian cuisine is the number one reason for national pride, with 48% of Peruvians citing it.

Hard-to-swallow truths

Gastronationalism can easily morph into chauvinism. Last month, Spanish influencer Ibai Llanos organised the “World Breakfast Cup” on his social media platforms, an online voting contest featuring breakfasts from 16 countries including the UK, Japan, Peru and other countries in Latin America. Peru’s pan con chicharrón (fried pork belly and sweet potato sandwich) won the tournament, defeating dishes from Mexico, Ecuador, Chile and Venezuela.

Peru's pan con chicharron -- a pork and sweet potato sandwich..
Peru’s champion breakfast: pan con chicharron – a pork and sweet potato sandwich..
Carolina_Ugarte_Photo/Shutterstock

The victory sparked a national celebration and boosted delivery orders of pan con chicharrón. But it also revealed a less savoury side of the competition. Some Peruvians took to the internet to mock rival cuisines, even going as far as to compare Ecuador’s bolón de verde to faeces.

It’s important to note that this gastronationalism – and the high-end cooking which has pushed Peru to the top of the world cuisine charts – occurs in a country where 17.6 million Peruvians (51% of the population) suffer from moderate or severe food insecurity and are unable to access a healthy diet because food costs have risen faster than wages. In a country that is rightly celebrated for its cuisine, which is attracting growing numbers of visitors specifically for its food, 43.7% of children under three suffer from anaemia and 12.1% of children under five suffer from chronic malnutrition.

Many people depend on community soup kitchens. In 2020 it was estimated there were more than 15,000 community kitchens providing for nearly 800,000 people. But there are concerns that all-too-often these community kitchens are unable to cater for the cultural and nutritional needs of Peru’s diverse population, particularly its Indigenous groups.

Peru’s gastronationalism also risks reproducing colonial hierarchies that promoted some people to elite status while, at the same time, marginalising Andean and Amazonian communities. In the food landscape, celebrity chefs from Lima often profit from Indigenous ingredients and techniques without providing fair compensation to the Indigenous communities that have safeguarded them for centuries.

A prime example is the guinea pig, (in Spanish: cuy). This has been a staple protein served and eaten whole in Andean communities for millennia. In the hands of elite restaurateurs, this has been transformed into delicacies such as cuy pekinés (a guinea pig prepared in the style of Peking duck) or as filling for ravioli.

Due to the sort of exorbitant prices charged for these dishes, these communities are excluded from tasting the reinterpreted versions of their own cultural expressions. Thus, celebrity chefs’ endeavours are built on an intricate dynamic of cultural appropriation and cultural appreciation – where a “borrowed” recipe or idea becomes more valuable the further it is taken from its Indigenous origins.

The paradox of Peru’s gastronationalism is that while it promotes a narrative of unity it simultaneously reinforces the divisions it claims to overcome. Celebrating food is not the issue. The issue is allowing that celebration to become an excuse for inaction over food poverty and inequality.

True culinary success will be measured not by more awards. It should be judged on whether the prosperity of the “gastronomic boom” can be extended beyond Lima’s elite restaurants to tackle the foundational inequalities upon which the current system is built.

The Conversation

Belinda Zakrzewska does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Peru’s gastronomic boom risks excluding the Indigenous people whose food it celebrates – https://theconversation.com/perus-gastronomic-boom-risks-excluding-the-indigenous-people-whose-food-it-celebrates-265896

How generative AI is really changing education by outsourcing the production of knowledge to big tech

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Kimberley Hardcastle, Assistant Professor in Business & Marketing, Northumbria University, Newcastle

Chay_Tee/Shutterstock

Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude are now used by students and teachers at every level of education.

According to a report by Anthropic, the company behind Claude, 39% of student interactions with the AI tool involve creating and improving educational content, such as practice questions, essay drafts and study summaries. A further 34% interactions seek technical explanations or solutions for academic assignments – actively producing student work.

Most responses to this from schools and universities have been to focus on immediate concerns: plagiarism, how assessments are conducted and job displacement. They include teaching AI literacy or developing courses for students on how to use and understand AI tools.

While these are important, what’s being overlooked is how evolving generative AI systems are fundamentally changing our relationship with knowledge itself: how we produce, understand and use knowledge.

This isn’t just about adding new technology to classrooms. It changes how we think about learning and challenges the core ideas behind education. And it risks granting power over how knowledge is created to the tech companies producing generative AI tools.

The bigger shift

Generative AI tools, including ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, can now create content, combine information and even mimic reasoning. As these AI systems are used more in classrooms and lecture theatres, they start to challenge the traditional ways we think about knowledge and learning.

My research focuses on what’s known as AI epistemology. Epistemology is the study of the origins and nature of knowledge. AI epistemology in education means grappling with new questions about how knowledge is produced.

Generative AI can instantly generate seemingly authoritative text on any subject. This forces us to reconsider what constitutes “original thought” versus “assisted thinking”. Traditional skills such as source evaluation, logical reasoning and weighing up evidence, need to be reconsidered when the “source” is a complex AI system trained on huge amounts of data that we can’t fully see or understand.

This represents a profound departure from centuries of education built on human-to-human knowledge transmission. Generative AI doesn’t just change what students learn but fundamentally alters how they come to know anything at all.

Students are increasingly likely to validate ideas by how well generative AI explains them, and increasingly less through their own analysis.

Traditional education relies on learning activities and assessments that align with what teachers want students to be able to do or understand. For example, if the goal is critical thinking, students practice analysing texts and are tested on their analysis skills, not just memorisation, to build deep understanding. But this framework assumes students construct knowledge independently through experience and reflection.

Teacher and pupils in discussion group
AI is changing how students form knowledge.
EF Stock/Shutterstock

Generative AI fundamentally disrupts this model. Students can produce sophisticated outputs without the cognitive journey traditionally required to create them.

Students are now becoming co-creators of knowledge in a machine-mediated system. Co-creation means these groups work together to produce learning outcomes. But co-destruction occurs when their conflicting goals undermine the educational experience. My research on value co-creation and co-destruction in higher education reveals that students, educators, administrators and technology providers with competing interests are shaping educational value.

For example, students might want efficiency, educators want deep learning, and tech companies want engagement metrics. These tensions can either enhance or erode learning quality. This framework now applies to AI integration. When generative AI helps students genuinely understand concepts, it creates value. When it enables shortcuts that bypass learning, it destroys value. Co-creation in education isn’t new, but generative AI as a co-creator changes everything.

Human thought survival

While often framed as the fourth industrial revolution, the current AI shift is more accurately an intellectual revolution. When we outsource thought unthinkingly to machines, we hand unprecedented power to shape knowledge to the technology companies developing this evolving technology.

Tech companies already turn our online behaviour into profit by collecting data to predict and influence what we do next, but we now face something deeper. If a handful of companies own the primary means of knowledge production, they control how we understand the world. Their algorithms’ biases, training data choices, and commercial incentives will determine what is produced and disseminated.

We’ve been here before. Social media exploits our cognitive vulnerabilities to capture our attention. But this time, the stakes are higher. It’s not just our attention at risk, but our capacity to think independently.

This isn’t about whether traditional education remains relevant. It absolutely does. It’s about educators defining what meaningful learning looks like now it’s accompanied by AI.

Generative AI isn’t just a sophisticated calculator; it changes how we understand knowledge. It’s reshaping how students conceptualise expertise, creativity, and their own cognitive capabilities. This will fundamentally change how young people think and learn.

Educators must ensure pedagogical wisdom, not commercial interests, guides this transformation. Encouragingly, this work has started. Centres for responsible AI, such as the one at my own university, ensure educators are driving these critical conversations rather than simply responding to them.

The Conversation

Kimberley Hardcastle does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. How generative AI is really changing education by outsourcing the production of knowledge to big tech – https://theconversation.com/how-generative-ai-is-really-changing-education-by-outsourcing-the-production-of-knowledge-to-big-tech-263160

From pea protein to buckwheat: surprising foods that can trigger severe allergic reactions

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Dipa Kamdar, Senior Lecturer in Pharmacy Practice, Kingston University

Anaphylaxis can cause a red, itchy, and swollen rash, often appearing as hives (welts) or flushing on the skin. Dmytro Zinkevych/Shutterstock

Food allergies are no longer limited to the usual suspects. Peanuts and shellfish may still dominate the headlines, but a growing number of people are reacting to foods not currently recognised in UK allergen laws.

As cases of severe allergic reactions rise, experts are urging policymakers to rethink which foods require mandatory labelling. As someone who has been caught out more than once by hidden allergens, I welcome the move.

Nearly one third of the UK population – around 21 million people – live with some form of allergy. Between 1998 and 2018, more than 100,000 people were hospitalised for food allergies, and 152 died as a result. About 6% of UK adults – roughly 2.4 million people – have a medically confirmed food allergy.

Under the Food Information Regulations 2014, food businesses must clearly label 14 major allergens when used as ingredients. These include cereals containing gluten (such as wheat, barley and rye); crustaceans (for example crabs and prawns); molluscs (such as mussels and oysters); fish; peanuts; tree nuts (including almonds, hazelnuts and walnuts); soya; milk; eggs; mustard; sesame; celery; sulphur dioxide or sulphites; and lupin. The allergens must be declared on packaging or made available to diners when eating out.

A major advance came in October 2021 with Natasha’s Law. It requires all pre-packed foods for direct sale (PPDS) to display a full ingredients list, with the 14 major allergens clearly highlighted. This reform closed a dangerous loophole and greatly improved transparency and safety for people living with food allergies.

But recent clinical research suggests that even this updated list may no longer be enough. A large study analysed almost 3,000 cases of food-induced anaphylaxis reported to the Allergy Vigilance Network (a European database that collects and monitors severe allergic reactions to food and other triggers) between 2002 and 2023.

It identified eight foods not currently on the EU and UK mandatory labelling list that were responsible for at least 1% of anaphylaxis cases. These include goat’s and sheep’s milk (2.8%), buckwheat (2.4%), peas and lentils (1.8%), pine nuts (1.6%), kiwi (1.5%), apple (1%), beehive products (1%), and alpha-gal – a sugar found in red meat – (1.7%).

The study’s authors argue that at least four of these (goat’s and sheep’s milk, buckwheat, peas, lentils and pine nuts) should be considered for mandatory labelling because of their frequency, severity and potential for hidden exposure.

The popularity of vegan and plant-based diets is increasing the use of ingredients such as pea protein, lentil flour and buckwheat – all linked to allergic reactions. A 2022 study found that pea protein, now common in meat substitutes, triggered reactions in people with legume allergies. Some allergens share similar protein structures, leading to cross-reactivity, which raises concerns about hidden allergens even in “healthy” foods.

It’s important to distinguish a true food allergy from a food intolerance. Intolerance does not involve the immune system and typically causes digestive issues, such as bloating, diarrhoea or stomach pain, because the body struggles to digest certain foods.

A food allergy, by contrast, occurs when the immune system mistakenly identifies specific proteins as harmful. This triggers an immune response involving immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies, which release chemicals such as histamine. The symptoms can range from mild itching, hives or nausea to severe swelling, breathing difficulties and anaphylaxis, usually within minutes or within two hours after exposure.

Anaphylaxis is a medical emergency. Symptoms can include swelling of the throat or tongue, difficulty breathing or swallowing, dizziness, fainting, pale or blue skin, and loss of consciousness. Immediate treatment is vital: the Resuscitation Council UK advises giving intramuscular adrenaline into the outer thigh, using an auto-injector such as an EpiPen, and repeating the dose after five minutes if symptoms persist, while calling emergency services.

Beyond the physical risks, food allergies carry a heavy emotional and social burden. Studies show that children and their parents often experience heightened anxiety around eating out, attending school or travelling. The constant vigilance required to avoid a serious reaction can erode quality of life and mental health.

The 14 allergens currently enshrined in UK law were a landmark in consumer protection. But science doesn’t stand still – and neither do allergies. As new triggers emerge, food safety regulations must adapt. Updating the allergen list isn’t just administrative housekeeping; it’s about preventing the next emergency and making sure everyone can eat with confidence.

The Conversation

Dipa Kamdar does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. From pea protein to buckwheat: surprising foods that can trigger severe allergic reactions – https://theconversation.com/from-pea-protein-to-buckwheat-surprising-foods-that-can-trigger-severe-allergic-reactions-263935

Réduire les biais cognitifs dans le recrutement : pour une pratique fondée sur des preuves

Source: The Conversation – France (in French) – By Vincent Berthet, Associate professor, Université de Lorraine

Trop souvent encore, le recrutement est considéré comme une affaire d’intuition à rebours de toutes les études montrant que la performance des entreprises aurait tout à gagner d’une démarche rationnelle. Il est urgent d’en finir avec cette idée fausse et dommageable à l’entreprise, dans un contexte où les bons candidats sont très demandés.


L’entretien est de loin la méthode de recrutement la plus utilisée pour évaluer les candidats. Dans sa forme traditionnelle, il s’agit d’un échange libre entre le recruteur et le candidat, où l’intuition et la subjectivité du recruteur jouent un rôle central. Beaucoup de recruteurs pensent que le fait de pouvoir exercer leur intuition est un atout, mais la recherche montre que ce n’est pas le cas.

Les limites de l’entretien d’embauche traditionnel

Évaluer les candidats de manière subjective ouvre la porte aux biais cognitifs. Par exemple, l’appréciation d’un candidat sur une caractéristique précise (comme son apparence physique) tend à s’étendre à d’autres dimensions (professionnalisme, intelligence, etc.), un phénomène appelé « effet de Halo ». Les recherches montrent également que la première impression du recruteur, formée dans les toutes premières minutes, influence fortement la suite de l’entretien. Par le biais de confirmation, le recruteur aura alors tendance, consciemment ou non, à orienter ses questions de manière à conforter cette première impression.

Le caractère subjectif de l’entretien traditionnel renvoie aussi au fait que le recruteur choisit librement ses questions, ce qui est doublement problématique : les questions posées n’évaluent pas nécessairement les caractéristiques pertinentes pour le poste, et elles ne sont pas les mêmes pour tous les candidats, ce qui rend toute comparaison entre eux en principe non valable.




À lire aussi :
Pourquoi le flou des « savoir-être » ne doit rien au hasard


Le problème suprême

Une autre forme d’entretien permet d’évaluer les candidats de façon plus objective : l’entretien structuré. Il s’agit d’identifier les compétences – techniques et comportementales – à évaluer (par exemple, la capacité à manager une équipe) à partir d’une analyse du poste, de définir les questions à poser pour évaluer chaque compétence (« Parlez-moi d’une fois où vous avez géré un conflit entre deux personnes de votre équipe »), et de définir des critères objectifs pour évaluer les réponses des candidats aux questions. Ces informations prennent la forme d’une grille d’entretien qui guide et limite la subjectivité du recruteur.

Depuis plus d’un siècle, les travaux en psychologie du travail et des organisations ont tenté d’identifier les méthodes de recrutement les plus prédictives de la performance professionnelle, une question qualifiée de « problème suprême » par les chercheurs dès 1917.

La dernière méta-analyse sur le sujet date de 2022 et ses résultats sont sans appel . Le jugement subjectif du recruteur à l’issue d’un entretien traditionnel corrèle seulement à 0.19 avec la performance professionnelle, soit bien moins que l’évaluation issue d’un entretien structuré (0.42). Celui-ci est d’ailleurs la méthode la plus prédictive de la performance professionnelle.

Deux méta-analyses de référence ont examiné la validité prédictive des différentes méthodes de recrutement : celle de Schmidt et Hunter (1998) et celle de Sackett et al. (2022). Les valeurs reportées correspondent à la corrélation entre les résultats des candidats à la méthode de recrutement et leur performance professionnelle une fois en poste (qui correspond souvent à l’évaluation par un manager). La figure a été créée par nous à partir des données figurant dans ces articles.

Un décalage entre la pratique et la recherche

La supériorité de l’entretien structuré sur l’entretien traditionnel illustre une réalité contre-intuitive : dans le recrutement, moins de subjectivité est synonyme de plus d’efficacité et plus d’équité. Pourtant, beaucoup de recruteurs professionnels sont peu enclins à abandonner l’entretien traditionnel, pour deux raisons principales.

D’une part, ils se disent : « J’ai toujours recruté comme ça, et je vois bien que ça marche. » En réalité, un recruteur qui observe l’effet de ses pratiques dans ses propres recrutements et « qui voit bien que ça marche » court un grand risque de se leurrer. Par exemple, les médecins qui pratiquaient la saignée invoquaient eux aussi la preuve par l’expérience, avant que cette pratique ne tombe en désuétude au XVIIᵉ siècle, avec les progrès scientifiques. Pierre Brissot, professeur émérite de médecine, souligne que l’on doit tirer de l’histoire de la saignée « une évidente leçon d’humilité, cette histoire démontrant, s’il en était besoin, que l’intime conviction ne peut se substituer à la preuve ».

D’autre part, de nombreux recruteurs surestiment leur capacité à repérer les talents par l’intuition, et l’entretien traditionnel leur permet d’exercer cette capacité. Dans son livre La diversité n’est pas ce que vous croyez ! (2025), Olivier Sibony raconte qu’à l’issue d’une conférence sur les biais cognitifs qu’il venait de donner à un groupe de professionnels des ressources humaines, la DRH d’une grande entreprise française était venue lui dire : « Excellente présentation. Vraiment très intéressant. Mais moi, vous savez, dès que le candidat sort de l’ascenseur, je vois tout de suite s’il va faire l’affaire. »

Fondation nationale pour l’enseignement de la gestion des entreprises (Fnege) Médias, 2024.

Ces croyances profondément ancrées expliquent la surutilisation persistante de l’entretien traditionnel en dépit de l’évidence scientifique. Comme le soulignent Bruchon-Schweitzer et Laberon :

« [I]l semble bien que les pratiques de recrutement, notamment en France, soient dictées par des impératifs étrangers à la science comme à la déontologie. L’impact des recherches (études de validité, notamment) sur les pratiques semble minime et le décalage entre praticiens et chercheurs est particulièrement aigu en France. »

Pour un recrutement fondé sur des preuves

À l’instar de la médecine ou encore de l’éducation, le recrutement gagnerait à encourager des pratiques fondées sur des preuves. Une telle approche permet aux recruteurs d’utiliser les méthodes qui sont les plus valides, mais également celles qui sont les plus équitables dans la sélection des candidats.

L’équité d’une méthode de sélection, c’est-à-dire sa capacité à ne pas discriminer les candidats et donc à garantir un recrutement inclusif, est un critère devenu central dans le recrutement. Là aussi, la recherche fournit des enseignements précieux. Les entretiens structurés, les tests de connaissances professionnelles et les questionnaires biographiques figurent parmi les méthodes les plus prédictives, tout en étant peu discriminantes. Ces méthodes allient donc validité et équité, ce qui devrait les rendre particulièrement pertinentes pour les recruteurs.

Le recrutement fondé sur des preuves n’est pas une lubie académique. Dans son livre Work Rules!, l’ancien DRH de Google Laszlo Bock explique comment il a remodelé le processus de recrutement chez Google suivant cette approche. Par exemple, pour répondre à la question « Quelles méthodes permettent le mieux de prédire la performance future des candidats ? », il s’est tourné vers les résultats de la recherche :

« Quelles techniques d’évaluation utilisons-nous ? L’objectif de notre processus d’entretien est de prédire la performance des candidats une fois qu’ils auront intégré l’équipe. Nous atteignons cet objectif en suivant ce que dit la science : en combinant des entretiens structurés comportementaux et situationnels avec des évaluations des aptitudes cognitives, du caractère consciencieux, et du leadership »_.

L’approche fondée sur des preuves reflète l’objectif pragmatique de déterminer ce qui fonctionne réellement. Elle s’est imposée en médecine et progresse dans l’éducation comme dans les politiques publiques. Pourquoi ne devrait-elle pas aussi s’appliquer au recrutement ? Car recruter, ce n’est pas miser sur l’intuition, mais s’appuyer sur des méthodes dont l’efficacité est démontrée par la recherche.

The Conversation

Vincent Berthet ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d’une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n’a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.

ref. Réduire les biais cognitifs dans le recrutement : pour une pratique fondée sur des preuves – https://theconversation.com/reduire-les-biais-cognitifs-dans-le-recrutement-pour-une-pratique-fondee-sur-des-preuves-264382

Le recours à l’intérim dans le travail social : opportunité ou fatalité ?

Source: The Conversation – France (in French) – By Laura Beton-Athmani, Attachée de Recherche IRTS PACA Corse – Chercheure associée LEST, Aix-Marseille Université (AMU)

Le recours presque inévitable à l’intérim assure la survie des établissements concernés, notamment sur des périodes dites « de tensions ». UnaiHuiziPhotography/Shutterstock

Quelles réalités recouvre l’emploi intérimaire dans le secteur médico-social en 2025 ? Une recherche exploratoire auprès de professionnels permet de dresser un premier panorama du phénomène.


Depuis plusieurs années, l’emploi intérimaire émerge dans un secteur où on ne l’attendait pas. Pire ! Où on le redoutait : le secteur social et médico-social. Au cœur d’un paradoxe fort, entre accompagnement de longue durée et travail par essence temporaire.

Faisant grincer des dents, ce phénomène mérite un intérêt particulier : donner à voir la complexité de celui-ci, et surtout des individus qui sont au cœur de ce dilemme « éthique ».

Et si ce qui s’apparente initialement à un désengagement était finalement une forme de réappropriation d’un métier souffrant d’un manque d’attractivité ? D’une marge de manœuvre dans l’exercice de ses fonctions ? Finalement, prendre soin de soi pour « durer » auprès de ceux qui en ont besoin ?

La crise du travail social ne date pas d’hier

La crise que connaît le travail social n’est pas nouvelle. Dès la fin des années 1990, des auteurs témoignent du malaise des travailleurs sociaux, engendré par une déstructuration de ce champ professionnel. Le sociologue Marcel Jaeger souligne en 2013 cette double impuissance, symbolisée par le manque de moyens et la perte de sens.

Le contexte actuel exacerbe cette crise : difficultés de recrutement, diminution de candidats au sein des instituts de formation, nouveaux profils de stagiaires, abandon de certains déçus par les conditions de travail, complexité des situations des personnes accompagnées, contraintes financières et procédurales, obligation de résultat, bas salaires, libéralisation du travail social, etc.

Émergence de l’emploi intérimaire

L’emploi intérimaire interroge une large frange des travailleurs sociaux et des personnels en poste d’encadrement dans le secteur. Mon intérêt pour ce phénomène émergé d’échanges réguliers avec des étudiants en certificat d’aptitude aux fonctions de directeur d’établissement ou de service d’intervention sociale (CAFDES) au sein de l’Institut Régional du Travail social (IRTS) Paca Corse.

À ce jour, peu d’études scientifiques évoquent ce phénomène, si ce n’est les travaux de Charlène Charles en protection de l’enfance. Ses résultats mettent en avant la « contrainte » du recours à l’intérim pour des professionnels précaires. Ils répondent principalement à des situations « d’urgence sociale », des missions de « contention sociale », souvent sollicités pour faire fonction de « renfort éducatif », pour des situations de « crises ».

Jusqu’alors, l’intérim a été justifié dans le secteur de la protection de l’enfance du fait de l’accroissement de situations complexes chez les jeunes de l’Aide Sociale à l’Enfance, nommés « les incasables ». Il touche d’autres champs, comme le handicap ou encore la lutte contre l’exclusion, champs enquêtés dans notre recherche.

Point juridique à ce sujet

Afin d’encadrer le recours à l’intérim, la loi Valletoux est promulguée le 27 décembre 2023. En application du décret du 24 juin 2024, elle fixe une durée minimale d’exercice préalable de deux ans pour certains professionnels avant leur mise à disposition d’un établissement ou service social ou médico-social par une entreprise de travail temporaire.

Rebondissement le 6 juin dernier. Le Conseil d’État annule cette mesure pour les professionnels expérimentés, eux aussi touchés par cette mesure.

Manque d’attractivité des métiers

Mais alors quelles réalités revêtent le recours à l’intérim en travail social en 2025 ? Notre recherche exploratoire auprès de deux organisations du secteur médico-social permet de dresser un premier portrait du phénomène.




À lire aussi :
Agents d’entretien : la crise sanitaire révèle l’absurdité des stratégies d’externalisation


Elle permet de confirmer le manque d’attractivité des métiers ou la souffrance des professionnels du secteur face à des conditions de travail difficiles. Quelques lignes de notre carnet de chercheur font état d’un acte de violence d’un résident auprès d’une professionnelle :

Le 30 janvier 2025, arrivée à 09 heures 15. Je croise C., la [cheffe de service], et H., une [aide-soignante], dans les couloirs. H. a une poche de glace sur la joue. Elle vient de se faire frapper par un résident. Elle propose l’achat d’un sac de frappe pour les résidents. C’était le cas dans un ancien établissement où elle a travaillé.

Intérim contraint et choisi

Au-delà, le recours à l’intérim met en lumière un rapport de force inversé, désormais entre les mains des individus et non plus des organisations. Il entraîne un recours presque inévitable à l’intérim afin d’assurer la survie des établissements concernés, notamment sur des périodes dites « de tensions ». Force est donc de constater le glissement d’un intérim « contraint » à un intérim « choisi » pour les professionnels du secteur.

« Les agences non lucratives, ça fait partie de leur mission d’amener les intérimaires à l’emploi. Les agences non lucratives, c’est une perte de capital humain », rappelle un directeur d’une association.

La digitalisation des agences d’intérim facilite la mise en contact avec les intérimaires, ainsi que la présence de nouvelles agences d’intérim dites coopératives. Certaines d’entre elles ont justement vu le jour grâce à un travail interassociatif, les organisations du secteur souhaitant retrouver une forme de contrôle sur les embauches de ces professionnels.

Période d’essai du CDI

Du côté des organisations, l’usage de l’intérim peut paraître ambigu. Pour l’une des organisations enquêtées, l’intérim est clairement affiché comme une « période d’essai » du CDI. Cela permet aux managers de proposer des CDI à des intérimaires dont les compétences ont été reconnues.

« Oui, c’est une source d’embauche importante. Ça a été un moyen de permettre, en fait, de remplacer une période d’essai, on va dire comme ça, avec des conditions, pour être honnête, plus avantageuses et pour la personne en intérim, et plus souples pour nous » relève un directeur associatif.

Pour les organisations, les motivations exposées résident principalement dans le fait que les « intérimaires repérés » jouent un rôle de facilitateur. Le recours à l’intérim facilite une partie du travail administratif, notamment lorsque l’agence d’intérim s’occupe des plannings des intérimaires et des roulements.

Ce type d’intérimaires repérés sont porteurs d’une histoire, de connaissances d’un dispositif. De facto, ils facilitent la prise de poste de professionnels permanents, notamment de leur supérieur hiérarchique.

« Pour ne rien vous cacher, ça m’arrangeait aussi puisque c’était toujours les mêmes intérimaires. Elles maîtrisaient mieux le dispositif que moi. Et si je suis honnête, c’est elles qui m’ont plus formée quand je suis arrivée » souligne une cheffe de service éducatif.

Se confronter à la réalité du travail

Du côté des intérimaires, l’intérim est utilisé pour choisir l’établissement d’exercice, afin d’éprouver les conditions réelles de travail face à l’image et la notoriété d’un établissement ou d’une association.

Les intérimaires témoignent de plusieurs motivations à recourir à ce statut : moins de stress, plus de liberté, des avantages financiers et une meilleure conciliation vie privée/vie professionnelle.

« J’ai des parents vieillissants dont je suis seule à m’occuper. Et comme je disais à la [cheffe de service] : je ne pourrais pas accompagner les résidents ici comme j’ai toujours fait […] Et ne pas m’occuper des miens, ce n’est pas possible. »

The Conversation

Laura Beton-Athmani est vice-présidente de l’association MJF – Jane Pannier.

ref. Le recours à l’intérim dans le travail social : opportunité ou fatalité ? – https://theconversation.com/le-recours-a-linterim-dans-le-travail-social-opportunite-ou-fatalite-262823