Iran’s capital faces unprecedented water shortages and even possible evacuation. What changes could help?

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Sanam Mahoozi, Research associate, City St George’s, University of London

Iran is facing its most severe water crisis in more than six decades.

Major dams supplying drinking water to provinces with millions of residents are nearly empty, and groundwater reserves have been depleted. Many cities have endured an entire autumn without a single drop of rain.

In the capital, Tehran, and in Mashhad, the country’s second-largest city, in the north-east, some reservoirs are at less than 5% and 3% capacity, respectively.

Authorities have begun cutting off water at night in the capital, according to reports. Iran’s president Masoud Pezeshkian has even warned of possible evacuations if “it doesn’t rain soon”. Images have surfaced on social media showing university students protesting water shortages on campuses.

Water shortages pose a serious security risk in Iran. In the summer of 2021, protests broke out in Khuzestan province in the south-west of the country due to severe water shortages. A few months later, farmers in Isfahan gathered to demonstrate over the Zayandeh-Rud River drying up.

Today in Shiraz (home to iconic cultural landmarks such as Persepolis) as well as the historic cities of Isfahan and Yazd, land subsidence is cracking buildings, collapsing roads and threatening monuments as excessive groundwater extraction weakens the soil beneath them.

More than 90% of Iran’s water is extracted for farming, with much of it lost to inefficient irrigation practices. Studies show the country’s ambitious dam-building campaign, intended to enhance food and energy self-sufficiency, has disrupted natural ecosystems and contributed to the drying up of major wetlands and lakes. These include Lake Urmia, once the Middle East’s largest salt lake, now reduced to a bed of salt that could fuel dust and salt storms across the region.

While climate change has contributed to the worsening drought, Iran’s water crisis has mainly been caused by poor management. The government’s focus on agricultural expansion and dam construction has often come at the expense of sustainability, while limited regulation of groundwater extraction including widespread drilling of around one million wells, half of which are illegal, has severely depleted aquifers across the country.

Iran’s foreign policy and isolation from the international community are also key drivers of its water crisis. Sanctions have meant that Iran has limited access to new technologies. These include advanced irrigation systems, high-resolution satellite monitoring such as InSAR data (which can detect land subsidence), cloud-based AI platforms for detailed urban or infrastructure-level monitoring, smart sensors, and precision agriculture tools.

Iran’s water levels are so low, that supplies are being turned off regularly.

The absence of such technologies has deepened inefficiencies, accelerated land subsidence and exacerbated the depletion of vital water resources across the country. Foreign investors are also hesitant to fund projects in Iran because of sanctions, further blocking opportunities for innovation.

Iran’s divided decision-making system has made the problem worse. The ministry of energy, the ministry of agriculture and the department of environment often operate with different priorities. One builds infrastructure for hydropower, another pushes for farmland expansion, while the environmental office doesn’t have enough resources and power to make major changes. These conflicting agendas have created confusion, inefficiency and widespread overuse of water.

But Iran’s water crisis goes beyond its borders. For instance, the country shares bodies of water with Afghanistan and Iraq. Disputes over water, such as the long-running disagreement with the Taliban over the Helmand River, have already increased tensions.

As lakes and rivers dry up, their exposed beds could turn into vast sources of sand and dust. These particles can travel thousands of kilometres, crossing national borders and degrading soil and air quality across the wider region.

What begins as a local water crisis in Iran then has the potential to become a transboundary environmental threat, affecting millions beyond its border, from Sistan and Baluchistan and Khuzestan to neighbouring countries downwind.

Can anything be done?

Scientists, academics, and the media have discussed the causes and consequences of Iran’s water crisis for a long time. What’s talked about far less, however, are the potential solutions – and whether anything can actually be done to address parts of the crisis and answer the question on the minds of more than 80 million people: Is there still hope?

The short answer is yes.

Assuming the country gains access to modern technology and finance through changes to its foreign policy (which means for instance that sanctions are removed), this could turn the tide. In the short term, the priority must be halting groundwater depletion through strict monitoring, smart meters on wells, and integrating satellite data with on-the-ground measurements.

Real-time water accounting – using tools such as space satellites Grace and Sentinel – can identify critical areas and guide emergency action. The government must also inspect areas affected by subsidence or over-extraction. This might include schools, which have suffered lots of problems with subsidence historically, causing cracked walls and other damage. Then it must take immediate action, including temporary closures or relocations where safety is at risk.

Mid-term priorities should focus on improving monitoring and efficiency. Managed aquifer recharge (a strategy that deliberately directs water into underground reservoirs) using stormwater or treated wastewater, precision irrigation, digital agriculture, and AI-based irrigation scheduling can dramatically reduce losses of water

AI and digital twin technologies (digital replicas of environments) have proved to be highly effective in sustainable natural resource management.

An example of this is how the €10 million (£8.8 million) EU-funded AI4SoilHealth flagship project leverages AI and big data analytics to monitor and quantify soil health across Europe. Managing water resources is no exception. Integrating AI-driven models and using new digital tools can enhance forecasting, optimise usage, and help inform policy decisions.

Long-term recovery also depends on governance. Iran needs a unified national water authority that aligns energy, agriculture, and environmental goals around sustainability.

Legal caps on groundwater abstraction, and economic diversification away from water-intensive crops are essential. Incentivising efficient irrigation and wastewater reuse plus adjusting water pricing to reflect scarcity would help.

The country must diversify its economy so that fewer livelihoods depend on water-intensive industries, such as farming. Together, these steps could stabilise Iran’s water systems and prevent further environmental, social, and economic damage.

Iran’s environmental crisis is human-made and so is the solution. With these changes, the country could secure its water systems, and give its public more security.

The Conversation

Nima Shokri receives funding from European Commission for the AI4SoilHealth project.

Sanam Mahoozi does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Iran’s capital faces unprecedented water shortages and even possible evacuation. What changes could help? – https://theconversation.com/irans-capital-faces-unprecedented-water-shortages-and-even-possible-evacuation-what-changes-could-help-269637

How patients are helping cancer researchers to ask better questions – and find better answers

Source: The Conversation – UK – By James Brown, Associate Professor in Cancer and Cell Biology, University of Limerick

PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock

Cancer research is evolving, not just in the lab, but in who is leading it. Increasingly, patients, carers and members of the public are stepping into the research process itself, shaping what questions get asked and how answers are found.

This approach, known as patient and public involvement (PPI), brings people with personal experience of illness from the sidelines to the centre of scientific discovery. It ensures research is grounded in the realities of those it aims to help.

Rather than being passive participants, patients become collaborators. They contribute insights, challenge assumptions and help shape research that matters in the real world. When people affected by cancer are treated as equals in the research process, the result is a more compassionate, inclusive and effective body of evidence, one that improves treatment, care and outcomes for everyone.

Personal experience improves science

When someone with cancer speaks about treatment or research, people listen. They are also trusted advocates who can help make the complex and often overwhelming world of scientific research more accessible, not just for other patients, but for the wider community too.

Patients act as bridges, linking healthcare staff and scientists, clinical practice and community understanding, hard data and human meaning. They challenge researchers to think differently, to ask better questions and to consider the real-world consequences of their work. Patients make science personal, reminding researchers that behind every dataset is a life, a family, a story.

Their involvement also helps demystify science. When patients share what they have learned with friends, families and local networks, they help foster trust and counter misinformation about cancer and its treatments. At a time when false health claims spread fast online, this kind of authentic engagement is invaluable.




Read more:
Generative AI and deepfakes are fuelling health misinformation. Here’s what to look out for so you don’t get scammed


And PPI does not just change how research feels, it changes what research finds.

In one clinical trial for a new anti-cancer drug, patients described the treatment as feeling like ice being injected into their veins, painful and distressing. This side-effect had not appeared in early trials or lab studies. Because of patient feedback, researchers were able to adapt the trial protocol, adjusting the dose or delivery method to make the experience less traumatic.

That kind of insight can only come from experience. Without patient voices, research risks missing the mark.

Rethinking the research process

Traditionally, cancer research was designed and led by academics and doctors. Patients provided samples and data, but rarely had a say in what questions were asked, how studies were run or how results were shared.

That is no longer enough. Science must be more collaborative, inclusive and responsive to the people it serves. That is where meaningful PPI comes in.

At the University of Limerick and University Hospital Limerick in Ireland, a new model of PPI is turning this principle into practice. Here, a patient-led steering group oversees all cancer research projects, ensuring every study is relevant, respectful and responsive to the needs of those affected.

Cancer patients join disease-specific panels and are matched with research teams based on shared goals or interests. These teams are made up of scientists, healthcare professionals and patients, working together as equals.

When patients lead, research stays grounded in what really matters: improving care, experience and outcomes.

To support participation in Limerick’s PPI programmes, the group provides accessible resources such as a plain language glossary of scientific and medical terms, continuing mentorship through regular meetings, and PPI training for academics through the independent national PPI Ignite Network.

Patients also help share research findings with their communities through social media, recruitment events and local meetings, bridging the gap between lab and life.

Cancer research is happening in hospitals, universities and research centres across the country. Because every cancer and every person is unique, researchers need a wide range of voices to guide their work.

You do not need a science background, just experience, curiosity and a willingness to share your perspective.

Search online for “patient and public involvement in cancer research” in your local area, or ask your healthcare team about local initiatives. Most researchers include a contact email on their institutional website and are happy to hear from potential collaborators.

Science is strongest when it listens. By bringing together patients, carers, researchers, doctors and the public as equal partners, we can make cancer research not only better, but more human.

The Conversation

James Brown has current funding from the Health Research Institute at the University of Limerick. He is affiliated with the University of Limerick, and is a member of the PPI steering committee.

ref. How patients are helping cancer researchers to ask better questions – and find better answers – https://theconversation.com/how-patients-are-helping-cancer-researchers-to-ask-better-questions-and-find-better-answers-260640

The Choral: this moving first world war film reveals the power of music to transcend despair

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Laura O’Flanagan, PhD Candidate, School of English, Dublin City University

Set in the Oxfordshire village of Ramsden in 1916, The Choral inhabits a world where the war is distant – yet its shadow lies over every street. Many of the young men are gone to the front, their names echoing through the church and village hall. Those left behind hover between waiting and pretending that life continues as before.

The film reunites Alan Bennett’s pen and Nicholas Hytner’s direction for their fourth film together (The Madness of King George, The History Boys, The Lady in the Van). Bennett’s eye for endurance and small absurdities, his distinct blend of humour and heartbreak, lends the story a warmth which threatens but never fully falls into sentimentality.

Determined to keep something of the village’s heart intact, the local choir opens its doors to all. The remaining boys – “fodder for the mill, fodder for the front” – join with nervous energy and untested voices. Around them unfold the small dramas of youth: crushes, jealousies, the thrill of being noticed – all under the dark cloud of war.

At times, the film recalls early Downton Abbey: the lightness of routine belying a deeper unease as the order of things begins to tremble. Hytner’s direction keeps the tone measured, his pacing unhurried, the village life unfolding in laughter across fields, flirtation in the lanes, and the faint hum of something approaching.

Ralph Fiennes, in superb form, is characteristically restrained as Dr Guthrie, the new choirmaster whose time in Germany prompts quiet gossip and complicates his loyalties. Dressed in tweed with a pocket watch gleaming, he brings calm authority tinged with sorrow. Alongside the enemy across the Channel, Guthrie sees the human faces behind the rhetoric of war, and thus he is both insider and outsider.

Beneath his composure runs a conviction that compassion itself has become a form of dissent. When Jacob Dudman’s traumatised soldier laments “life’s fucking shit”, Guthrie replies simply: “So, sing.” It becomes the film’s credo: music as both defiance and survival, a way to hold despair at bay. That spirit finds its fullest expression in Mary (Amara Okereke), whose voice lifts through the air with a brilliance that soars towards the transcendent.

Disappointingly, in a story otherwise so attuned to compassion, the film’s portrayal of women feels thin. The women of Ramsden are treated as narrative currency, their sexuality quietly commodified and offered as recompense for men’s suffering. The Choral would struggle to pass even the most forgiving version of the Bechdel test: the few conversations between women are framed by men’s absence or desire.

The film hints at a worldview in which women and sex are treated as rites of passage, experiences the young men are owed before war denies them adulthood. Yet for all the attentiveness to male sorrow, its compassion remains finely tuned to the loss which binds the village, finding moments of truth despite its blind spots.

While the choir scenes are wonderful and the climactic performance is deeply moving, the film is most affecting in its quietest moments. Jubilant farewells at the railway station are almost immediately shadowed by trains bringing home the wounded. The innocence of departure meets the silence of return, and in between lies everything the village will lose.

When a young woman rejects a soldier newly home, Hytner captures the moment with painful clarity: the war has already cut him off from the life he fought to reclaim. The village photographer (Mark Addy) records the last flicker of innocence, freezing faces that might have stepped from the stanzas of Philip Larkin’s poem MCMXIV “grinning as if it were all / An August Bank Holiday lark” – still radiant with a trust in life that history will soon betray.

The Choral is both elegy and celebration: a reminder that even in the quietest corners, song can sound like survival – the fragile note of hope that refuses to fade.


Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


The Conversation

Laura O’Flanagan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. The Choral: this moving first world war film reveals the power of music to transcend despair – https://theconversation.com/the-choral-this-moving-first-world-war-film-reveals-the-power-of-music-to-transcend-despair-269771

Trespassers and troubadours: what to watch and listen to this week

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Anna Walker, Senior Arts + Culture Editor, The Conversation

The winner of this year’s Booker prize, Hungarian-British writer David Szalay, has often been accused of overwriting. His earlier short story collections and novels sometimes lost readers in their ornate, over-detailed descriptions. It seems he’s taken that criticism to heart. After abandoning a novel he had been working on for nearly four years in 2020, Szalay has returned with Flesh – a book that, contrary to its title, strips the story right to the bone.

A short, propulsive read, Flesh took the prize because of its singularity. The judging panel said: “Szalay has a talent for only telling the good parts. This is the story of a man’s life, from his youth to deep into adulthood, and yet there are gaps left in the protagonist’s life that Szalay leaves uncovered. He generously allows the reader to fill them in.”

For our reviewer, Tory Young, who researches 21st-century literature, the novel was “deeply affecting.”

Flesh is available in all bookshops now




Read more:
David Szalay’s Flesh wins the Booker prize – a deeply affecting novel about masculinity


Running men and trespassers

The 1987 adaptation of Stephen King’s The Running Man is one of many spandex-filled Arnold Schwarzenegger films my partner has made me watch. As far as Arnie movies go – and I do enjoy the occasional one (True Lies, for instance) – The Running Man is pretty dreadful. So, if not for the involvement of director Edgar Wright, I probably wouldn’t have been tempted to see the new adaptation.

Fortunately, Wright’s signature flair for fast-paced action and lead actor Glenn Powell’s undeniable charisma makes this version a winner. In fact, according to our reviewer, King expert Matt Jacobsen, it’s “the most fun you’ll have at the cinema this year”.

The Running Man is in cinemas now




Read more:
The Running Man is the most fun you’ll have at the cinema this year


The trailer for The Running Man.

As well as film recommendations, we like to share books in The Conversation office. The one that’s perhaps been passed around the most is Louise Kennedy’s masterful debut novel, Trespasses. It follows the relationship between Cushla, a young Catholic woman, and Michael, an older married Protestant man during the Troubles in Northern Ireland. No doubt we’ll all be tuning into the excellent new Channel 4 adaptation, starring Tom Cullen and Lola Petticrew.

Romances between Catholics and Protestants are still often controversial in Northern Ireland. Laura Smith, a researcher at the University of Liverpool, regularly interviews Northern Irish women in these mixed-denominational relationships. She found that the show’s themes of forbidden love still ring true for these couples.

Trespasses is available to watch on Channel 4 On Demand




Read more:
Trespasses: little has changed for couples dating across the religious and political divide in Northern Ireland


Brilliant women

Apple TV had me at “Emma Thompson” with their new drama Down Cemetery Road. Add Ruth Wilson to the mix, and I’ve been counting down the days to its release. Now that it’s here, it doesn’t disappoint.

Art conservator Sarah (Wilson) and private investigator Zoë (Thompson) uncover evidence that the UK government deliberately maimed its own soldiers during secret chemical weapons testing on the Afghanistan battlefield. The result is thrilling, but also sharp, funny and unexpectedly thoughtful – all set to a brilliant soundtrack featuring Björk, PJ Harvey and Billie Holiday.

Down Cemetery Road is available to watch weekly on Apple TV




Read more:
Down Cemetery Road: Emma Thompson and Ruth Wilson delight in this light conspiracy thriller


The trailer for Down Cemetery Road.

Also playing on my speakers this week is LUX, the stunning new album from Spanish singer-songwriter Rosalía. It’s a remarkable piece of work, with lyrics in 14 different languages, weaving together a tapestry of styles drawn from a rich variety of storytelling traditions and cultures.

If you’re wondering where to start, check out the music video for the lead single, Berghain (which also features Björk). In it, Rosalía goes about everyday tasks – ironing, visiting the doctor – while a full orchestra squeezes into the room, accompanying her haunting, operatic voice.

Our reviewer found that through its exploration of faith and courtly love, LUX evokes the tradition of the Spanish troubadour. No wonder Madonna has called Rosalía a “true visionary.”




Read more:
LUX: the tradition of the troubadour is at the heart of Rosalía’s songwriting



This article features references to books that have been included for editorial reasons, and may contain links to bookshop.org. If you click on one of the links and go on to buy something from bookshop.org The Conversation UK may earn a commission.


Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


The Conversation

ref. Trespassers and troubadours: what to watch and listen to this week – https://theconversation.com/trespassers-and-troubadours-what-to-watch-and-listen-to-this-week-269734

Quand l’IA devient le consommateur

Source: The Conversation – in French – By Sylvie-Eléonore Rolland, Maître de conférences, Université Paris Dauphine – PSL

L’intelligence artificielle (IA) ne se contente plus de guider nos choix : elle anticipe nos besoins et agit à notre place. En orchestrant décisions et transactions, devient-elle une entité consommatrice ? Que devient notre libre arbitre de consommateur face à un marché piloté par les algorithmes ?

Ce texte est publié dans le cadre des Dauphine Digital Days dont The Conversation France est partenaire.


Alors que les modèles classiques de comportement du consommateur reposent sur l’intention, la préférence et le choix, l’automatisation introduite par l’intelligence artificielle (IA) transforme en profondeur la chaîne décisionnelle. En s’immisçant dans les étapes de reconnaissance des besoins, d’évaluation des alternatives et d’achat, l’IA ne se contente plus de guider – elle agit.

Cette mutation questionne le cadre théorique du consumer agency, l’idée selon laquelle les consommateurs ont la capacité d’agir de manière intentionnelle, de faire des choix et d’exercer une influence sur leur propre vie et sur leur environnement. Ce déplacement progressif du pouvoir décisionnel interroge. Il interpelle la nature même de l’acte de consommer.

L’IA peut-elle être considérée comme une actrice de consommation à part entière ? Sommes-nous encore maîtres de nos choix ou sommes-nous devenus les récepteurs d’un système marchand autonome façonné par l’intelligence artificielle ?

Personnalisation de l’expérience

Les algorithmes prédictifs, programmes qui anticipent des résultats futurs à partir de données passées, sont aujourd’hui des acteurs incontournables de l’environnement numérique, présents sur des plateformes, telles que Netflix, Amazon, TikTok ou Spotify. Conçus pour analyser les comportements des utilisateurs, ces systèmes visent à personnaliser l’expérience en proposant des contenus et des produits adaptés aux préférences individuelles. En réduisant le temps de recherche et en améliorant la pertinence des recommandations, ils offrent une promesse d’assistance optimisée.

Toutefois, cette personnalisation soulève une question centrale : ces algorithmes améliorent-ils l’accès aux contenus et aux produits pertinents, ou participent-ils à un enfermement progressif dans des habitudes de consommation préétablies ?




À lire aussi :
Sommes-nous prêts à confier nos décisions d’achat à une IA ?


En favorisant les contenus similaires à ceux déjà consultés, les systèmes de recommandation tendent à renforcer les préférences préexistantes des utilisateurs, tout en restreignant la diversité des propositions auxquelles ces derniers sont exposés. Ce phénomène, identifié sous le terme de « bulle de filtre », limite l’ouverture à des perspectives nouvelles et contribue à une uniformisation des expériences de consommation.

L’utilisateur se trouve ainsi progressivement enfermé dans un environnement façonné par ses interactions antérieures, au détriment d’une exploration libre et fortuite, le « faire les boutiques » d’autrefois.

Glissement progressif de l’IA

Ce glissement remet en question l’équilibre entre l’intelligence artificielle en tant qu’outil d’assistance et son potentiel aliénant, dans la mesure où la liberté de choix et l’autonomie décisionnelle constituent des dimensions fondamentales du bien-être psychologique et de la construction identitaire.

Il soulève également des enjeux éthiques majeurs : dans quelle mesure l’expérience de consommation est-elle encore véritablement choisie, lorsqu’elle est orientée, voire imposée, par des algorithmes, souvent à l’insu des consommateurs, notamment ceux dont la littératie numérique demeure limitée ?

Des algorithmes qui deviennent cibles de la publicité

L’optimisation des publicités et des publications en ligne repose de plus en plus sur des critères imposés par les plateformes.

Cette tendance est particulièrement visible sur des plateformes comme YouTube, où les vidéos adoptent systématiquement des codes visuels optimisés : visages expressifs, polices de grande taille, couleurs vives. Ce format ne résulte pas d’une préférence spontanée des internautes, mais découle des choix algorithmiques qui privilégient ces éléments pour maximiser le taux de clics.

De manière similaire, sur les réseaux sociaux, les publications adoptent des structures spécifiques, phrases courtes et anecdotes engageantes, comme sur X, où les utilisateurs condensent leurs messages en formules percutantes pour maximiser les retweets. Cela ne vise pas nécessairement à améliorer l’expérience de lecture, mais répond aux critères de visibilité imposés par l’algorithme de la plateforme.

Ainsi, l’objectif des annonceurs ne se limite plus à séduire un public humain, mais vise principalement à optimiser la diffusion de leurs contenus en fonction des impératifs algorithmiques. Cette dynamique conduit à une homogénéisation des messages publicitaires, où l’innovation et l’authenticité tendent à s’effacer au profit d’une production standardisée répondant aux logiques des algorithmes.

Influence sur les préférences des consommateurs

Ces formats prédominants sont-ils uniquement imposés par les algorithmes, ou reflètent-ils les attentes des consommateurs ? En effet, si les algorithmes sont conçus pour maximiser l’engagement, cela suppose qu’ils s’appuient en partie sur les comportements et les préférences des utilisateurs. Pourtant, la véritable interrogation réside sans doute dans la manière dont les algorithmes influencent, par des expositions répétées, nos propres préférences, jusqu’à redéfinir ce que nous percevons comme attractif ou pertinent.

L’évolution de l’intelligence artificielle a donné naissance aux systèmes d’achat autonomes, qui prennent des décisions d’achat en toute indépendance. Ces systèmes reposent sur deux types d’agents intelligents : les agents verticaux et les agents horizontaux.

Les agents verticaux sont des IA spécialisées dans des domaines précis. Ils optimisent la gestion des achats en analysant des besoins spécifiques. Par exemple, les réfrigérateurs « intelligents » scannent leur contenu, identifient les produits manquants et passent commande automatiquement avant même que les consommateurs ne décident eux-mêmes de passer commande.

Les agents horizontaux coordonnent quant à eux plusieurs domaines d’achat. Des assistants, comme Alexa et Google Assistant, analysent les besoins en alimentation, mobilité et divertissement pour proposer une consommation intégrée et cohérente. L’interaction multi-agents permet ainsi d’accroître l’autonomie des systèmes d’achat.

Les agents verticaux assurent la précision et l’optimisation des achats, tandis que les agents horizontaux garantissent la cohérence des décisions à l’échelle globale. Cette synergie préfigure un avenir où la consommation devient totalement ou partiellement automatisée et prédictive. Progressivement, nous ne décidons plus quand acheter ni même quoi acheter : ces systèmes autonomes agissent pour nous, que ce soit pour notre bien ou à notre détriment !

Arte, 2024.

Qui est le principal agent de décision ?

L’accès à l’information et l’instantanéité offertes par l’IA aurait fait de nous des consommateurs « augmentés ». Pourtant, son évolution rapide soulève désormais une question fondamentale : sommes-nous encore les véritables décideurs de notre consommation, ou sommes-nous progressivement relégués à un rôle passif ? L’IA ne se limite plus à nous assister ; elle structure désormais un écosystème au sein duquel nos décisions tendent à être préprogrammées par des algorithmes, dans une logique d’optimisation.

Une telle dynamique soulève des interrogations profondes quant à l’avenir des modes de consommation : l’IA est-elle en passe de devenir le véritable consommateur, tandis que l’humain se limiterait à suivre un flux prédéfini ? Assistons-nous à l’émergence d’un marché où les interactions entre intelligences artificielles supplantent celles entre individus ?

L’avenir du libre arbitre

Si ces technologies offrent un confort indéniable, elles posent également la question du devenir de notre libre arbitre et de notre autonomie en tant que consommateurs, citoyens et humains. Dès lors, ne sommes-nous pas à l’aube d’une révolution où l’humain, consommateur passif, s’efface au profit d’une économie pilotée par des systèmes de consommation intelligents autonomes ?

Plus qu’une volonté de contrôle total des technologies qui freine l’innovation, c’est peut-être notre propre autonomie qu’il convient de repenser à l’aune de l’émergence de ces systèmes. Il s’agit alors de construire, selon la perspective des « technologies de soi » de Michel Foucault, des pratiques par lesquelles l’individu œuvre à sa propre transformation et à son émancipation des diverses formes de domination algorithmique.

x.
Fourni par l’auteur

The Conversation

Sylvie-Eléonore Rolland ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d’une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n’a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.

ref. Quand l’IA devient le consommateur – https://theconversation.com/quand-lia-devient-le-consommateur-269765

From misgendering to missed diagnoses: the barriers that can keep trans people from safe healthcare

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Stephanie Horsted, PhD Candidate, Pain management in the transgender community, Department of Research and Graduate Studies, Health Sciences University

Cat Box/Shutterstock

Transgender people can encounter significant obstacles and barriers within healthcare systems that may hinder access to care or affect the quality of treatment they receive. These challenges vary widely, but together they can create environments that feel less supportive than they should be.

A 2025 report found that, in the UK, 52% of transgender people surveyed had a negative healthcare experience. The effect of such experiences, which can be due to prejudice, discrimination or simply a lack of knowledge among healthcare staff, can be profound. It forces many to live with health problems without seeking medical attention.

One of the most common problems encountered by transgender people in healthcare is misgendering. This occurs when a health professional uses incorrect names or pronouns, for example referring to someone as “he” instead of “she,” or using a former name – known as deadnaming – either through lack of knowledge or an unwillingness to acknowledge a patient’s gender identity.

For many transgender people, being misgendered is a denial of who they are, even if it’s not intended. Studies show that frequent misgendering can lead transgender and non-binary people to feel invisible, invalidated and emotionally distressed. This kind of miscommunication can leave patients feeling disrespected or dismissed, reinforcing existing inequalities in care.




Read more:
How inclusive language can help to reduce birth trauma


The impact of misgendering trans people goes far beyond emotional discomfort. According to US charity the Trevor Project’s 2024 national survey on LGBTQ+ youth mental health, transgender and nonbinary young people whose pronouns were respected all or most of the time had around half the suicide attempt rate of those whose pronouns were rarely or never respected.

This doesn’t mean pronoun use alone prevents suicide, but that it signals something larger: affirmation, safety and belonging. Misgendering, by contrast, reinforces rejection and invisibility. The psychological strain of being misgendered, combined with the stress of untreated health issues, can make healthcare settings feel unsafe and discourage people from seeking support.

Research indicates that these experiences contribute to deeper mistrust of healthcare professionals and reduce engagement with medical services. Over time, that mistrust can make people reluctant to return for follow-up care, even when they are unwell. Evidence shows that transgender people who delay seeking healthcare because of anticipated discrimination experience poorer physical and mental health outcomes.

Exclusion from routine screening

Another widespread issue is the lack of inclusion in standard health screenings. Many medical protocols, from cervical smear tests to prostate exams, have been historically designed with cisgender patients in mind.

“Cisgender” refers to people whose gender identity matches the sex they were assigned at birth. This traditional focus has created serious gaps in preventive care for transgender people, particularly those who have transitioned or whose bodies do not align neatly with conventional gender categories.

Research shows that transgender people are significantly less likely to receive recommended cancer screenings than cisgender patients. A large US primary care study found that transgender people were screened at far lower rates for cervical (56% v 72%), breast (33% v 65%) and colorectal cancer (55% v 70%) than cisgender people.

Similarly, a systematic review reported that trans men were less likely to attend cervical and breast screening, while trans women had lower rates of prostate cancer screening than cisgender men.

These disparities are not simply a matter of personal choice. Administrative systems in many countries still match screening invitations to gender markers rather than anatomy. As a result, some patients are automatically called for irrelevant tests while others are excluded from ones they need.

This can delay early detection and leave treatable conditions undiagnosed. Experts note that such oversights reflect a healthcare model that still operates around a rigid gender binary rather than one based on a person’s medical need and anatomy.

Even when screenings are offered, they can be uncomfortable or traumatic. Procedures such as pelvic or breast exams are often not designed with transgender bodies or experiences in mind.

For example, trans men may still have internal reproductive organs that are associated with the female anatomy, but experience heightened distress or gender dysphoria, a feeling of discomfort or anxiety caused by a mismatch between their gender identity and physical anatomy, during pelvic exams. Research shows that this can make routine care feel invasive or emotionally painful.

Trans women may find breast or prostate examinations distressing or triggering (they can provoke anxiety, fear or memories of past discrimination) if staff are unfamiliar with gender-affirming care, which emphasises respectful communication, consent and understanding of diverse anatomies. In settings where these practices are lacking, patients may fear being judged, misgendered or asked insensitive questions.

Equipment, clinic environments and communication styles are often based on cisgender assumptions, which presume that all patients’ bodies and identities align with the sex they were assigned at birth.

This can heighten anxiety and discomfort, making medical visits feel unsafe. Consequently, many transgender people postpone preventive screenings, reinforcing a cycle in which missed appointments lead to later diagnoses and poorer health outcomes.

“Trans broken arm syndrome”

A particularly common phenomenon in transgender healthcare is known as “trans broken arm syndrome”. The term describes how healthcare professionals sometimes overlook or minimise a transgender person’s immediate medical needs by focusing disproportionately on their gender identity or transition history, even when unrelated to the presenting issue.

For instance, a transgender person might attend an emergency department with a broken arm but find that clinicians focus on hormone therapy or surgical history rather than the injury, leading to misdiagnosis, delays in treatment or inappropriate care.

The cost of fear

The combined impact of misgendering, exclusion from essential screenings and “trans broken arm syndrome” often drives transgender people to avoid healthcare altogether. Many delay seeking medical help because they expect to be disrespected or mistreated.

The fear and anticipation of stigma can become so overwhelming that it outweighs the need for care, leading to worsening physical and mental health over time.

That so many transgender people continue to endure preventable suffering because they fear discrimination or practices that make them feel uncomfortable because of a lack of training reveals a persistent problem within healthcare systems. These disparities are not only the result of individual prejudice but also of structural inequities in medical education, screening protocols and institutional design.

Without a cultural shift towards inclusion and respect, transgender people will continue to face inequities in access to healthcare, with potentially serious consequences for their physical and mental wellbeing.

The Conversation

Stephanie Horsted does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. From misgendering to missed diagnoses: the barriers that can keep trans people from safe healthcare – https://theconversation.com/from-misgendering-to-missed-diagnoses-the-barriers-that-can-keep-trans-people-from-safe-healthcare-269427

Why the UK should think twice before copying Denmark’s asylum policies

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Michelle Pace, Professor in Global Studies at Roskilde University, Roskilde University

When the British government recently announced its plan to emulate Denmark’s asylum and immigration system, it framed the move as a way to restore fairness and regain control. But for those who know how Denmark’s system actually works, the move raises serious ethical — and practical — questions.

This is not the first time the UK and Denmark have looked to each other for ideas on tough migration policies. In 2022, both considered schemes to send asylum seekers to Rwanda and for claims to be processed there.

In the end, neither country went ahead. Denmark paused its proposals and the UK’s scheme was blocked by the courts and then ditched after a change of government.

Denmark once prided itself on its liberal welfare state and human rights commitments. But it has spent the past decade turning itself into one of Europe’s toughest destinations for refugees.

Indeed, it is the only country in Europe to have revoked refugee protection on a large scale. And the first to reorient its laws away from integration and towards return.

I have spent years studying Denmark’s migration system and interviewing the refugees affected by it. My forthcoming book, Un-welcome to Denmark, traces the laws governing entry, residence and expulsion in Denmark’s Aliens Act, which has been amended more than 100 times over 36 years (1983–2019).

For context, that pace of change is unusually high, making Denmark’s immigration system one of the most frequently revised in Europe. And this has created near constant uncertainty for those living under it.

A tougher system

The turning point for Denmark’s asylum system came in 2015, when a change to the Aliens Act allowed authorities to revoke refugee status if conditions in someone’s home country had improved — even when those improvements were fragile or unpredictable.

Between 2017 and 2018, roughly 900 Somali refugees lost their residence permits. Then in 2019, just as the Social Democrats returned to power under Mette Frederiksen, parliament approved a package of legislation that has widely been described as a “paradigm shift” in Denmark’s asylum policy.

Under this tougher system, Syrian refugees who held temporary protection had their permits reassessed. In 2022 alone, nearly 400 Syrians left Denmark, fearing they would lose their refugee status and sought protection elsewhere in Europe.

Residencies were revoked, but refugees could not be deported, because Denmark had no diplomatic relations with the then Assad government. So people were placed in so called “departure centres” — facilities designed to house people expected to leave the country (and under stricter conditions than standard refugee shelters).

Some of the Syrians I spoke with, who were detained at these centres, described the experience as extremely unpleasant — a non-life — seemingly designed to push them to leave voluntarily.

A life in limbo

Denmark has become a pioneer in restrictive immigration policies. And this has come with serious legal, ethical and moral challenges.

The European Court of Human Rights has, for example, previously found that Denmark violated the right to family life under the European Convention on Human Rights due to a three-year waiting period for refugees with temporary protection.

Last year, the European Court of Justice accused Denmark of racial discrimination for planned mass housing evictions in previously so called “ghetto” neighbourhoods (now referred to as parallel societies, where a high proportion of residents are migrants.

Refugees I’ve spoken with have told me how they often feel that integration is pointless if they might still be deported. Social isolation and limited rights for asylum seekers are the norm. Families face long waiting times for reunification despite few cases and refugees face temporary permits that hinder long-term planning.

The system is clearly designed to discourage settlement through restrictive living conditions and a lack of control over daily life, which creates a huge amount of stress and fear for those living under such rules.

Harsh and destabilising

Denmark’s asylum system shows how far a (supposedly) centre-left government can go in tightening migration policies while maintaining political support. The Social Democrats inherited a strict framework and have continued to apply it, including temporary protection, reassessment of refugee status and the use of departure centres.

For the UK, which is now considering adopting similar policies, the Danish experience offers cautionary lessons. These measures may reduce asylum numbers, but they come at a human and legal cost. Families are left in uncertainty, long-term planning is impossible and life in departure centres can be harsh and destabilising.

Any government looking to copy this approach should look beyond the statistics and consider the real experiences of the people affected. Denmark’s story is a reminder that migration policy is not just about managing numbers — it is also about the lives that are shaped by those policies.


This article was commissioned by Videnskab.dk as part of a partnership collaboration with The Conversation. You can read the Danish version of this article, here.

The Conversation

Michelle Pace received funding from the Carlsberg Foundation for her forthcoming monograph entitled Un-welcome to Denmark. The Paradigm Shift and Refugee Integration (MUP, December 2025). (Details here: https://www.carlsbergfondet.dk/en/what-we-have-funded/cf21-0519/). She is also an Associate Fellow, Europe Program, at Chatham House.

ref. Why the UK should think twice before copying Denmark’s asylum policies – https://theconversation.com/why-the-uk-should-think-twice-before-copying-denmarks-asylum-policies-269660

Ukraine’s farms once fed billions but now its soil is starving

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Mark Sutton, Honorary Professor in the School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh

Research suggests soil in Ukraine is degrading, affecting food production. Oleksandr Filatov/Shutterstock

For decades, Ukraine was known as the breadbasket of the world. Before the full-scale Russian invasion in 2022, it ranked among the top global producers and exporters of sunflower oil, maize and wheat. These helped feed more than 400 million people worldwide.

But beyond the news about grain blockades lies a deeper, slower-moving crisis: the depletion of the very nutrients that make Ukraine’s fertile black soil so productive.

While the ongoing war has focused global attention on Ukraine’s food supply chains, far less is known about the sustainability of the agricultural systems that underpin them.

Ukraine’s soil may no longer be able to sustain the country’s role as one of the major food producers without urgent action. And this could have consequences that stretch far beyond its borders.

In our research, we have examined nutrient management in Ukrainian agriculture over the past 40 years and found a dramatic reversal of nutrient levels.

During the Soviet era, Ukraine’s farmland was excessively fertilised. Nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were applied at levels far beyond what crops could absorb. This led to pollution of the air and water.

But since independence in 1991, the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction. Fertiliser use, especially phosphorus and potassium, plummeted as imports fell, livestock numbers declined (reducing manure availability) and supply chains collapsed.

By 2021, just before the full-scale invasion, Ukrainian soil was already showing signs of strain. Farmers were adding much less phosphorus and potassium than the crops were taking up, around 40–50% less phosphorus and 25% less potassium, and the soil’s organic matter had dropped by almost 9% since independence.

In many regions, farmers applied too much nitrogen, but often too little phosphorus and potassium to maintain long-term fertility. Moreover, although livestock numbers have declined significantly over the past decades, our analysis shows that about 90% of the manure still produced is wasted. This is equivalent to roughly US$2.2 billion (£1.6 billion) in fertiliser value each year.

These nutrient imbalances are not just a national issue. They threaten Ukraine’s long-term agricultural productivity and, by extension, the global food supply that depends on it.

Ukraine’s farmers face multiple challenges.

The war has sharply intensified the problem. Russia’s invasion has disrupted fertiliser supply chains and damaged storage facilities. Fertiliser prices have soared. Many farmers deliberately applied less fertiliser in 2022-2023 to reduce financial risks, knowing that their harvests could be destroyed, stolen or left unsold due to blocked export routes.

Our new research shows alarming trends across the country. In 2023, harvested crops took up to 30% more nitrogen, 80% more phosphorus and 70% more potassium from the soil than they received through fertilisation, soil microbes and from the air (including what comes down in rain and what settles onto the ground from the air).

If these trends continue, Ukraine’s famously fertile soil could face lasting degradation, threatening the country’s capacity to recover and supply global food markets once peace returns.

Rebuilding soil fertility

Some solutions exist and many are feasible even during wartime. Our research team has developed a plan for Ukrainian farmers that could quickly make a difference. These measures could substantially improve nutrient use efficiency and reduce wasted nutrients, keeping farms productive and profitable, while reducing soil degradation and environmental pollution.

These proposed solutions include:

  1. Precision fertilisation – applying fertilisers at the right time, place and amount to match crop needs efficiently

  2. Enhanced manure use – setting up local systems to collect surplus manure and redistribute it to other farms, reducing dependence on (imported) synthetic fertilisers

  3. Improved fertiliser use – applying enhanced-efficiency fertilisers that release nutrients slowly, reducing losses to air and water

  4. Planting legumes (such as peas or soybeans) – including these in crop rotations, improves soil health while adding nitrogen naturally

Some of these actions require investment, such as better facilities for storage, treatment and better application of manure to fields, but many can be rolled out, at least partially, without too much extra funding.

Ukraine’s recovery fund, backed by the World Bank to help Ukraine after the war ends, includes support for agriculture, and this could play a key role here.

Why it matters beyond Ukraine

Ukraine’s nutrient crisis is a warning for the world. Intensive, unbalanced farming, whether through overuse, under use or misuse of fertilisers, is unsustainable. Nutrient mismanagement contributes to both food insecurity and environmental pollution.

Our research is part of the forthcoming International Nitrogen Assessment, which highlights the need for effective global nitrogen management and showcases practical options to maximise the multiple benefits of better nitrogen use – improved food security, climate resilience, and water and air quality.

In the rush to ensure cheap food and stable exports, we must not overlook the foundations of long-term agricultural productivity: healthy, fertile soils.

Supporting Ukraine’s farmers offers a chance not only to rebuild a nation but also to change global agriculture to help create a more resilient, sustainable future.

Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 47,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.

The Conversation

Prof. Mark Sutton works for the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, based at its Edinburgh Research Station. He is an honorary professor at the University of Edinburgh, School of Geosciences. He receives funding from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) through its Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF), the UK Department for Environment and Rural Affairs (Defra), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Global Environment Facility (GEF). He is Director of the International Nitrogen Management System (INMS) funded by GEF/UNEP, and of the GCRF South Asian Nitrogen Hub. He is co-chair of the UNECE Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen (TFRN) and of the Global Partnership on Nutrient Management (GPNM) which is convened by UNEP.

Sergiy Medinets receives funding from UKRI, Defra, DAERA, British Academy, UNEP, GEF, UNDP and EU

ref. Ukraine’s farms once fed billions but now its soil is starving – https://theconversation.com/ukraines-farms-once-fed-billions-but-now-its-soil-is-starving-269147

Ukraine: battered by bombing and scarred by corruption

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Jonathan Este, Senior International Affairs Editor, Associate Editor, The Conversation

This newsletter was first published in The Conversation UK’s World Affairs Briefing email. Sign up to receive weekly analysis of the latest developments in international relations, direct to your inbox.


Nightly, for months now, Ukraine’s cities have been pounded by relentless aerial attacks. In addition to its grinding and attritional ground offensives in the east and south of the country, since early summer, the Russian military has greatly expanded its air offensive against centres of population, looking to collapse morale and undermine the Ukrainian people’s will to fight on.

And as winter approaches, so those aerial bombardments have targeted Ukraine’s power infrastructure.

Repeatedly in recent weeks, whole cities have been plunged into cold darkness as power plants, transmission lines and regional and local substations are damaged or destroyed. Rolling power outages are now common, reportedly lasting up to 14 hours in some cases.

So the latest political scandal to hit the government of Volodymyr Zelensky could hardly have come at a worse time for his country. And to make matters worse, it revolves around Ukraine’s energy industry.

Ukraine’s anti-corruption agencies this week released the findings of Operation Midas, an 18-month probe into Energoatom, the state-owned operator of all of Ukraine’s nuclear power plants, investigating allegations of bribes and kickbacks said to amount to US$100 million (£76 million). Raids were carried out around the country and seven people have been arrested.

What makes this so dangerous for Zelensky is that one of the people named in the probe is a former business partner of his. Businessman Timur Mindich was the co-owner, with Zelensky, of Kvartal 95 Studio – the platform on which the Ukrainian president made his name as a comedian before he entered politics (ironically, under the circumstances, as an anti-corruption candidate).

Mindich is reported to have left the country, but he is said to have connections to several senior government ministers. The scandal risks tainting the already embattled Zelensky government by association.

What’s worse, as Stefan Wolff and Tetyana Malyarenko explain, is that only a few months before this scandal exploded, Zelensky tried to bring Ukraine’s independent anti-corruption agencies under the direct control of his government. He backed down in the face of huge demonstrations, but this latest corruption scandal is likely to weaken him further.

He has already lost his justice minister, German Galushchenko, and energy minister, Svitlana Hrynchuk. And, as Wolff and Malyarenko point out, the last thing Zelensky needs while his European allies debate how to raise desperately needed funds to keep fighting is a whiff of corruption surrounding his administration.




Read more:
Ukraine: energy corruption scandal threatens to derail Zelensky’s government and undermine its war effort


Having spent the day debating how to raise the huge amounts of money Ukraine will need in 2026, it appears that the EU is closing in on a preferred option. The European Commission considered two main options. One plan is for either the EU to borrow €140 billion (£124 billion) using its long-term budget as collateral. Another is to use the frozen Russian assets as collateral for a loan to Ukraine, to be repaid after the war if Russia pays reparations to Kyiv.

An idea floated by Norwegian economists to use Norway’s €1.8 trillion sovereign wealth fund to guarantee the loan was quickly scotched by the country’s finance minister, former Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg, who said that while Norway was happy to contribute, it could not be responsible for the entire amount.

The next move will be to assuage the fears of Belgium, which is where the assets are held by securities depository Euroclear, that a successful legal challenge by Russia could leave it liable for repayment. The Kremlin has already made noises to this effect.

Veronika Hinman, the deputy director of the University of Portsmouth’s military education team, believes that while the massive injection of funds will certainly enable Ukraine to continue to fight, it’s unlikely to be decisive. “It cannot deliver the manpower, weapons or morale,” she writes.

Hinman describes the fairly dire situation on the battlefield, where Russia is slowly but surely beating back the defenders outside key cities such as Pokrovsk and Huliaipole. The invaders continue to press for a breakthrough in these strategically important towns, which would allow them to make a push into central Ukraine.

ISW map showing the state of the conflict in Ukraine, November 11 2025.
The state of the conflict in Ukraine, November 11 2025.
Institute for the Study of War

Russia has been unsuccessfully trying to capture both Pokrovsk and Huliaipole for many months (its troops briefly entered Huliaipole on March 5 2022, only a couple of weeks after the invasion started, and were pushed back). But the fight appears to be increasingly lopsided, writes Hinman. Russia may have lost more than a million troops – killed or injured – but it has huge reserves and its retooled war economy appears to be bearing up reasonably well, despite US sanctions.

So the need for more money from the EU grows ever more critical, Hinman writes. But she worries that “in the end, this latest wave of aid may buy Ukraine time – but it’s unlikely to deliver victory”.




Read more:
Kyiv’s European allies debate ways of keeping the cash flowing to Ukraine but the picture on the battlefield is grim


Trump: lawfare and diplomacy

In the US, meanwhile, blows were struck in a different kind of war as a Florida prosecutor issued subpoenas to a range of officials that the US president believes are part of the “deep-state” opposition to his presidency.

When you look at the targets of these subpoenas, which include former CIA director John Brennan, former FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok, former FBI attorney Lisa Page and former director of national intelligence James Clapper, the thinking becomes clear. All of them were involved in the federal investigation into alleged links between Russian intelligence and Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

As we know, under instruction from Trump, the Justice Department has already gone after several of the president’s enemies, including former FBI director James Comey, former national security adviser John Bolton and New York attorney general Letitia James.

It’s all part of what has become known as the “grand conspiracy”, writes Robert Dover, an expert in intelligence from the University of Hull. And it appears as if the Trump administration is gearing up for some serious lawfare.

As Dover observes, whether or not these investigations actually end up with anyone facing court is, while not immaterial, not the whole point of the exercise. In the US, these investigations can take a huge toll on their targets: emotionally, financially and health-wise.

Dover points to a new unit in the Department of Justice, the “weaponization working group”, whose director, Ed Martin, said his job was to expose and discredit people he believes to working against the president: “If they can be charged, we’ll charge them. But if they can’t be charged, we will name them.” This, writes Dover, is a complete inversion of the traditional approach of: “charge crimes, not people”.

It feels like another step on the road to authoritarian government, he observes.




Read more:
First subpoenas issued as Donald Trump’s ‘grand conspiracy’ theory begins to take shape


The incumbent of the Oval Office, meanwhile, received the (relatively) new leader of Syria, Ahmed al-Sharaa, this week. He’s the first Syrian leader ever to visit the White House and the visit represents a considerable rise to power and respectability for someone who, until a year ago, was leading an insurgent group against Syria’s Assad regime. His Hayat Tahrir al-Sham was, until July, proscribed by the US as a terrorist organisation.

But, as William Plowright, a Syria expert from Durham University, points out, as far back as 2015, former CIA director David Petraeus suggested that the US should consider working with the organisation which later became al-Sharaa’s group, Jabhat al-Nusra, against Islamic State.

As Plowright observes, there are upsides for both Trump and al-Sharaa in striking up a working relationship, not least of which is that it would deprive Iran of its closest ally in the region.




Read more:
How former jihadist Ahmed al-Sharaa ended up being welcomed to the White House



Sign up to receive our weekly World Affairs Briefing newsletter from The Conversation UK. Every Thursday we’ll bring you expert analysis of the big stories in international relations.


The Conversation

ref. Ukraine: battered by bombing and scarred by corruption – https://theconversation.com/ukraine-battered-by-bombing-and-scarred-by-corruption-269755

Commerce, résilience, durabilité : la recette du G20 pour l’Afrique

Source: The Conversation – in French – By Wandile Sihlobo, Senior Fellow, Department of Agricultural Economics, Stellenbosch University

Le groupe de travail sur les systèmes alimentaires et agricoles durables du Business 20, un groupe consultatif du G20, a approuvé trois principes qui, selon lui, contribueront à la mise en place de systèmes alimentaires et d’une agriculture durables. Ces principes sont l’augmentation des échanges commerciaux, la résilience des chaînes d’approvisionnement et les pratiques agricoles durables.

L’économiste agricole Wandile Sihlobo explique ces trois principes et comment les pays africains peuvent les mettre à profit.

Qu’est-ce que la sécurité alimentaire mondiale ? En quoi diffère-t-elle de la pauvreté alimentaire ?

La sécurité alimentaire mondiale est un concept plus large. Elle vise à relever les défis liés à l’accès à la nourriture, à la nutrition, à la durabilité et à l’accessibilité financière. Elle cherche aussi à renforcer la coopération entre les pays – notamment les membres du G20 – pour réduire la pauvreté, à la fois dans le monde, au niveau national et au sein des ménages.

Pour atteindre cet objectif, chaque pays doit adapter ses politiques agricoles. Cela passe par une hausse de la production, une approche respectueuse de l’environnement et une réduction des obstacles au commerce.

Les pays qui ne produisent pas assez doivent pouvoir importer de la nourriture à un coût abordable. Cela implique de faciliter la logistique mondiale, de supprimer certains droits de douane et de lever, dans certains cas, les interdictions d’exportation. En 2023, par exemple, l’Inde a interdit l’exportation du riz non basmati, ce qui a provoqué une hausse des prix mondiaux.

C’est pour cette raison que je défends l’approche consistant à « assurer la sécurité alimentaire grâce au commerce ». Dans un monde où les échanges sont souvent entravés, cette approche permet de réduire les coûts et d’améliorer le niveau de vie, notamment dans les régions les plus pauvres principalement le Moyen-Orient et l’Asie.

Comment l’augmentation des échanges commerciaux, la résilience des chaînes d’approvisionnement et les pratiques agricoles durables peuvent-elles renforcer la sécurité alimentaire ?

Ces leviers sont au cœur de la réduction des coûts. Si les obstacles au commerce (tarifs douaniers, barrières non tarifaires ou interdictions d’exportation) sont allégés, il devient plus facile et moins cher d’acheminer les denrées des zones de production vers les zones de consommation à un prix abordable.

Des chaînes d’approvisionnement résilientes signifient également que les denrées alimentaires peuvent être produites, transformées et acheminées vers les points de consommation avec moins d’obstacles, même en cas de catastrophes naturelles et de conflits.

Quant aux pratiques agricoles durables, elles sont essentielles au système alimentaire mondial. Cela ne signifie pas qu’il faut abandonner les semences améliorées, la recherche génétique ou les intrants chimiques. Il s’agit principalement de mieux les utiliser.

J’ai remarqué une tendance inquiétante à l’activisme qui vise à éliminer les intrants agricoles, une voie qui conduirait à une baisse de la productivité et de la production agricoles, et finalement à une aggravation de la faim. La clé réside dans une utilisation sûre et optimale de ces intrants.

Lors des récentes manifestations agricoles dans l’Union européenne, l’approche réglementaire de l’UE en matière de pratiques agricoles durables a été l’un des principaux risques soulevés par les agriculteurs. Ils ont cité le Pacte vert pour l’Europe, qui vise à accélérer la réduction de l’utilisation d’intrants tels que les pesticides, les engrais et certains autres produits chimiques, qui sont essentiels à l’augmentation de la production.

À mon avis, le G20 devrait se prémunir contre les initiatives militantes qui mettent en danger la sécurité alimentaire mondiale.

Quelles politiques spécifiques les pays, en particulier les nations africaines, devraient-ils mettre en place pour garantir le succès de ces principes ?

L’Afrique du Sud et l’Union africaine, qui sont toutes deux membres du G20, devraient promouvoir trois grandes interventions dans le domaine de l’agriculture afin de mettre en œuvre les trois principes du G20 et de stimuler la production alimentaire au profit du continent africain.

1. Agriculture intelligente face au climat

Tout d’abord, il convient d’appeler fermement au partage des connaissances sur les pratiques agricoles intelligentes face au climat. Il s’agit de nouvelles innovations et méthodes agricoles qui minimisent les dommages causés aux cultures par les catastrophes climatiques telles que la sécheresse et les vagues de chaleur. Cela est important car l’Afrique est très vulnérable aux catastrophes naturelles.

Pour que l’agriculture africaine puisse se développer, les gouvernements doivent mettre en place des politiques coordonnées sur la manière de répondre aux catastrophes. Ces réponses doivent inclure tout ce dont les pays africains ont besoin pour atténuer les catastrophes climatiques, s’adapter au changement climatique et se remettre rapidement lorsque des catastrophes surviennent.

2. Réforme commerciale

Deuxièmement, l’Afrique doit faire pression pour une réforme du système commercial mondial et améliorer la sécurité alimentaire en Afrique grâce au commerce. L’Afrique du Sud bénéficie déjà d’un meilleur accès au commerce agricole avec plusieurs économies du G20 grâce à des droits de douane réduits et à un accès en franchise de droits.

Tous les membres du G20 ont intérêt à défendre un commerce ouvert entre les nations. Cela permet d’acheter et de vendre des produits agricoles à moindre coût. Ce qui est essentiel dans un contexte mondial où certains pays adoptent une attitude plus conflictuelle en matière de commerce.

Les pays africains dont l’agriculture est moins productive, avec des rendements généralement faibles ou médiocres, pourraient ne pas bénéficier autant, à court terme, d’un commerce ouvert. Ils en tireront toutefois profit à long terme.

3. Améliorer l’accès aux engrais

Troisièmement, l’Afrique doit continuer à prioriser la production et le commerce des engrais. Dans la plupart des pays d’Afrique subsaharienne, l’accès et l’usage des engrais restent faibles. Or, ils sont essentiels pour accroître la production et réduire l’insécurité alimentaire. L’accès à des financements abordables est également un défi pour l’agriculture africaine.

Il est donc essentiel de relier les discussions sur les engrais aux investissements dans les industries de réseau telles que les routes et les ports. Disposer d’engrais est une chose, mais leur acheminement vers les zones agricoles est difficile dans certains pays et augmente les coûts pour les agriculteurs. Dans ce cadre, le G20 devrait encourager la production locale.

La production d’engrais sur le continent atténuerait l’impact négatif des chocs mondiaux sur les prix. Elle permettrait également aux pays africains les plus vulnérables d’acheter et de distribuer des engrais à un prix abordable.

Comment concilier productivité agricole et réduction de l’impact climatique ?

Nous devons utiliser la technologie pour nous adapter au changement climatique plutôt que de diaboliser l’utilisation des produits agrochimiques et la sélection des semences, qui est certainement une tendance à la hausse dans certaines régions d’Afrique du Sud. Si nous utilisons des variétés de semences à haut rendement, des engrais et des produits agrochimiques pour lutter contre les maladies, nous pouvons alors cultiver une superficie relativement plus petite et compter sur un rendement suffisant.

Mais si nous réduisons considérablement ces intrants, nous dépendons davantage de l’expansion de la superficie que nous cultivons. Cultiver plus de terres signifie nuire à l’environnement. L’accent devrait être mis sur l’utilisation optimale et sûre des intrants agricoles afin d’améliorer la production alimentaire. C’est la clé pour parvenir à la sécurité alimentaire mondiale.

Le G20 a un rôle à jouer pour garantir que nous nous dirigeons vers un monde meilleur. Les principes agricoles évoqués ici offrent une feuille de route concrète pour construire un monde meilleur avec plus de sécurité alimentaire.

The Conversation

Wandile Sihlobo is the Chief Economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (Agbiz) and a member of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council (PEAC).

ref. Commerce, résilience, durabilité : la recette du G20 pour l’Afrique – https://theconversation.com/commerce-resilience-durabilite-la-recette-du-g20-pour-lafrique-269627