Ahead of seismic local elections, what we know about Reform’s ability to put boots on the ground for the campaign

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Tim Bale, Professor of Politics, Queen Mary University of London

What we used to think of as Britain’s two main parties, Labour and the Conservatives, seem more than happy to postpone as many of this year’s upcoming local elections as possible.

Labour insists the delays are needed because of ongoing local authority reorganisation. Opponents allege the decision has more to do with opinion polls that show both parties losing out badly to Reform, the Lib Dems and the Greens.

Who knows which is true? But it’s all yet another reminder that the UK’s formerly cosy, two-party system seems to be falling apart in front of our eyes.

In a year that holds the potential for electoral gains in councils and in races for the Welsh Senedd and Scottish parliament, what we used to refer to as country’s “minor” parties will have to run many campaigns.

In order to take full advantage of that fragmentation, they ideally need boots on the ground – people prepared to knock on doors and push leaflets through letter boxes in order to encourage supporters to actually get out and vote. These days, it’s also useful to have people willing to create (or at least share) content online.

That raises the question: who do they have? Given that the people who do the most campaigning for parties are its members, we can start by looking at how these numbers are distributed around the country. Reform makes big splashes in the national media, but does it have people who know the ground in the Vale of Clwyd?

My colleagues and I – the party members project run out of Queen Mary University of London and the University of Sussex – have looked into this in a newly published report.

It’s one thing to have plenty of party members – and there have been huge surges in people joining both the Greens and Reform since we conducted our surveys around the time of the 2024 election – but it matters where they’re located and how much they’re prepared to do.

Obviously, it helps to have members in those areas of the country that, opinion polls suggest, are particularly fertile territory. This may well be the case for the Lib Dems and for Reform, although Reform leader Nigel Farage will surely be hoping that that he’s managed to recruit a few more members in Wales and in London since we did our field work.

At that time, just 8% of Reform members were located in Wales, compared to 30% in the south of England. Only 12% of members were in London, where every borough has a council election in 2026.

A map showing how party membership breaks down across the country for each party.
Where are party members?
T Bale, CC BY-ND

As for the Greens, they look rather thinly spread. Like Reform, there’s more of a presence in the south, where 32% of members are to be found. But in London it’s 12%, although it looks like that might be changing fast and for the better in some parts of the capital.

Certainly, irrespective of which region they’re located in, if Green party members live in those multicultural urban areas where Labour looks vulnerable, then they could still prove very useful in May.

How useful members are, of course, also depends on whether they’re willing to actually help out. At the 2024 election, from which our data is derived, around a third of all Lib Dem and Reform UK members, devoted no time at all to their party’s campaign efforts. The Tories, Greens and Labour had it even worse. Around half of their members put no time in.

Digging a bit deeper into the kind of activities members do reveals some interesting differences. In the increasingly important online world, it looks as if the Greens and Reform UK may well have something of an advantage. Their members were more likely to share social media content about their party than members of the Lib Dems and Conservatives.

A chart showing what percentage of party members across parties share content about their parties on social media.
Which party members are active on social media?
T Bale, CC BY-ND

On the doorstep, however, it’s the Lib Dems who are right up there. Some 37% of Lib Dems delivered leaflets to people’s homes in 2024 – a figure that rises to 59% if we ignore those members who told us they’d done nothing for the party during the election.

This is one of the reasons, along with continued Conservative weakness, why, in spite of them being paid far less attention than current media darlings, the Greens and Reform UK, Lib Dem leader Ed Davey’s often underrated party stands to do well in the spring.

Reform’s membership performed less impressively in 2024 – only 20% delivered leaflets, albeit a figure that rises to 34% if we take those members who did nothing at all out of the equation. The figures for canvassing (a rather more demanding activity which parties often struggle to persuade members to help with) – 12% and 21% – are much lower.

A graphic showing what percentage of party members across parties actually knock on doors to campaign.
Who is knocking on doors?
T Bale, CC BY-ND

A key question for Farage, then, will be how he can motivate the people who’ve flooded into his party (boosting its membership to over 270,000) to get out on the doorstep or at least hit the phones in order to contact voters. Zack Polanski faces a similar challenge when it comes to the 150,000 people who now belong to the Greens, most of whom have joined since he took over as leader.

Campaigning by members isn’t everything, of course. Activists who aren’t members play a part, as does top-down, national campaigning – even in local elections. Still, these figures do give some insight into the strengths and weaknesses of party organisation around the country at the start of what looks set to be a crucial set of elections this spring.


Want more politics coverage from academic experts? Every week, we bring you informed analysis of developments in government and fact check the claims being made.

Sign up for our weekly politics newsletter, delivered every Friday.


The Conversation

Tim Bale has received funding from Research England for this survey work.

ref. Ahead of seismic local elections, what we know about Reform’s ability to put boots on the ground for the campaign – https://theconversation.com/ahead-of-seismic-local-elections-what-we-know-about-reforms-ability-to-put-boots-on-the-ground-for-the-campaign-273626

Romantasy: sexy tales of women-centred fantasy fiction are boosting the publishing industry

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Athanasia Daskalopoulou, Senior Lecturer in Marketing, University of Liverpool

In certain corners of the internet recently, people have been debating why “women can’t stop reading fairy porn”.

These discussions centre around the fantasy romance genre, also known as romantasy, which has exploded in both popularity and sales. Onyx Storm, Rebecca Yarros’s third book in The Empyrean series, was the fastest-selling adult novel in 20 years when published in early 2025, according to the New York Times. It sold more than 2.7m copies in its first week.

Bloomberg reported that romantasy was estimated to bring in US$ 610m (£455m) in sales in 2024, revitalising the publishing industry. These growing sales have made us, as feminist marketing scholars, interested in understanding this genre and its readers who swoon over muscular, handsome faerie princes and dream of dragon taming.

Traditionally, male readers have dominated fantasy fiction fandoms. As such, narratives centring female characters have often been sidelined in many of the most popular fantasy fiction books. Think of J.R.R. Tolkein’s Bilbo and Frodo Baggins from The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings, or Fitz from Robin Hobb’s The Farseer Trilogy series.

Romantasy stories counter this, offering fantasy worlds where romance is a key plot point. The protagonists are often women and they centre women’s stories and women’s romantic relationships.

Female characters in these books set off on “hero journeys”, meet handsome and caring men along the way, experience romance and sexual pleasure, and defeat evil. In some ways, romantasy follows many familiar fantasy tropes, including good vs evil, medieval settings or magical schools, fantastical creatures and magical powers. However, they also incorporate tropes from romance – a genre that has historically sustained the publishing industry – such as enemies to lovers, forbidden love and forced proximity (oh no, there’s only one bed).


No one’s 20s and 30s look the same. You might be saving for a mortgage or just struggling to pay rent. You could be swiping dating apps, or trying to understand childcare. No matter your current challenges, our Quarter Life series has articles to share in the group chat, or just to remind you that you’re not alone.

Read more from Quarter Life:


Romantasy books, however, are often mistaken for erotica or “smut” for women. Readers sometimes rank books in terms of “spicy” levels indicating how salacious their storylines are. However, sexual content is not new to fantasy. Some of the most popular fantasy books, like George Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series (Game of Thrones), include frequent and graphic sex scenes.

Romantasy, however, has a distinct draw. These stories feature experiences of consensual sex and female-centred sexual pleasure while also tapping into complex themes. For instance, Rebecca Yarros’s Fourth Wing deals with chronic illness and Sarah J Mass’s A Court of Thornes and Roses deals with several traumas, including grooming, sexual abuse, war and poverty.

Romantasy authors, who are often women, aim to eschew the “male gaze” typical of much media, including literature. This is where, as feminist film scholar Laura Mulvey describes, women are often presented as passive objects for male sexual pleasure and viewing, rather than as active subjects with agency. For instance, in A Song of Ice and Fire and similar fantasy books, the sex often includes a form of violence against women.

Romantasy books instead centre the “female-gaze” in which female desire, power and identity are explored from a female point of view.

In the study we are working on, women have expressed that romantasy enables them to experience romantic and sexual fantasies that they might not experience in the real world, and helps them discover and experiment with their sexuality.

Younger readers we spoke to found liberation in reading about realistic and non-taboo representations of women’s romantic and sexual fantasies. Women from conservative cultures said they were inspired by female characters who are not afraid or ashamed to seek out sexual pleasure.

Romantasy books are not without their issues, however. Despite the female-centred narratives, some of the most popular books in the genre perpetuate heterosexual norms, either ignore racial and sexual diversity, or feature problematic and limiting representations of them. For example, Rebecca Yarros proudly states that Xaden, the male love interest character in Fourth Wing, is not white, without specifying which race he is – as though all non-white racial groups are the same.

However, in our study, we continue to find that even if all women (especially older women and women of colour) cannot connect to romantasy protagonists, they resonate with how these stories prioritise female pleasure and safety, with partners that are devoted to them. It is not only “smut” or “spice” that appeals to female readers, but more importantly, the acknowledgement of women as sexual subjects, rather than objects for male pleasure or targets of sexual violence.

While sex is an important part of romantasy, it is not erotica. Where erotica is all about the sex, often, the “spicy” content in romantasy only lasts a few pages and is a part of a broader romantic arc between the protagonist and the supporting male love interests.

As the genre continues to grow, we hope that romantasy is taken seriously by the publishing industry (it’s certainly benefiting from it) as well as by the wider public. Currently, the industry popularises TikTok viral books, resulting in repetitive, white-centric and heterosexual stories. There are, however, diverse representations to be found. For instance, The Emily Wilde series by Heather Fawcett or Paladin’s Grace by T. Kingfisher both feature women in their thirties and forties.

For queer representation and cosy romance, there’s Legends and Lattes by Travis Baldree. Additionally, books by women of colour, like The Inheritance Trilogy by N.K. Jemisin, and The Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi by Shannon Chakraborty, feature racial and ethnically diverse characters in a fantasy setting with a romantic subplot.

Perhaps in time, like with other genre writing, publishers and readers will seek out, support and promote more diverse stories in romantasy that will appeal to all kinds of women.


Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


The Conversation

The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Romantasy: sexy tales of women-centred fantasy fiction are boosting the publishing industry – https://theconversation.com/romantasy-sexy-tales-of-women-centred-fantasy-fiction-are-boosting-the-publishing-industry-272737

Iran’s crackdown: why security forces are shooting demonstrators straight in the eye

Source: The Conversation – France – By Firouzeh Nahavandi, Professeure émérite, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)

In Iran, protestors and especially militants are being subjected to an extremely violent crackdown with shooting aimed at their eyes. Blinding the enemy who dares to dispute the powers that be, is the latest act of repression to go down in the country’s long history.


Over the course of the Iranian dissident action in recent years, and during the nationwide Women, Life, Freedom movement in 2022 the frequency of eye injuries inflicted upon protestors has come under public scrutiny. Women, young people and students, often passers-by even, have literally lost an eye, or their – eyesight – from buckshot or close-range projectiles. A tactic by security forces that we are now witnessing again: lawyer and 2003 Peace Nobel laureate Shirin Ebadi estimated on 9 January that “at least 400 people have been admitted to hospital in Tehran with firearm-related eye injuries since protests kicked off at the start of the year.

Such brutal use of force reveals far more than just police slip-ups. These acts are part of a political rhetoric that is echoed throughout Iran’s long history, in which aiming for the eyes symbolically signifies stripping someone of their personal, political capital.


A weekly e-mail in English featuring expertise from scholars and researchers. It provides an introduction to the diversity of research coming out of the continent and considers some of the key issues facing European countries. Get the newsletter!


Power lies in the eye of the beholder

In ancient Iranian political culture, power and the eyes are inextricably linked. I see, therefore I know; I see, therefore, I judge; I see, therefore I govern. This concept runs throughout Iran’s literary and political realms. For instance, in the Shahnameh (Book of Kings) by Ferdowsi (10th Century), blindness constitutes a narrative marker of political and cosmic decline: heralding the loss of farr (divine glory), the principle of the legitimisation of power as a durable, symbolic disqualification of the exercise of sovereignty. Being blinded is synonymous with being fallen.

In the Shahnameh, the passage where Rustam blinds Esfandiar with an arrow is an edifying scene for Iran’s political realm: by targeting the eyes, the tale overtly associates the loss of vision with the disqualification of power and an end to all grounds for claiming sovereignty.

Rustam blinds Esfandiar with an arrow (opaque watercolour on paper), undated. Click to zoom.
San Diego Museum of Art/Bridgeman Images

Historically, blindness was used as a political neutralising weapon. It was a way of eliminating a rival – prince or dignitary – without spilling blood, which was considered sacrilegious where the elite was concerned. Blind people weren’t executed, they were eradicated from the political arena.

The Shah of Persia Abbas the Great (who ruled from 1588 until his death in 1629) blinded several of his sons and grandsons whom he suspected of plotting against him or opposing succession to the throne.

In 1742, Nader Shah ordered for his son, then heir to the throne Reza Qoli Mirza to be blinded, an emblematic act of political silencing practices in Persia.

From blinding rituals to blinding to maintain security: why are protestors’ eyes so frequently in the firing line of Iranian security forces?

The Islamic Republic does not lay claim to blinding as punishment, but the massive repetition of eye injuries during contemporary repression reveals a symbolic continuity.

Once rare, targeted and admitted to, the use of blinding is now widespread, denied by the authorities, carried out using weapons termed “non-lethal” and rarely sanctioned.

Yet its political role of neutralising without killing, strike the body to deter and prevent further dissent still remains comparable.

In contemporary Iran, the eyes have become a political weapon. Demonstrators film, document and diffuse what they see. Images circulate, reach the borders and weaken the government’s narrative. When the eyes are hit, you can’t see or show others, putting a stop to filming, identifying and witnessing.

The target isn’t just the individual’s point of view; it’s the broader vision that connects the streets of Iran with international public opinion.

Unlike the act of blinding in ancient times that was reserved for the male elite, nowadays eye-related violence mainly is targeted at women and young people. The female gaze, independent, freed from all ideological control, for the world to see becomes politically intolerable for a regime founded on dictating the body and what should be seen.

A continuum of visible brutality

The ongoing repression following on from mass protest action that kicked off in late December 2025, intensified after a nationwide Internet blackout, blatantly sought to reduce exposure of the acts of violence inflicted on protestors.

Independent medical reports and witness accounts described hospitals as being overwhelmed with casualties – specifically eye-related – along with a rise in crowd-control involving firearms with real bullets, documented in several Iranian provinces. These injuries confirm that the body and particularly, the ability to see and report, are still the main target of repressive rule.

Beyond the figures, women’s first-hand accounts tell a different tale of these contemporary practices. While Iranian society has witnessed women spearheading activist movements since Mahsa Jina Amini’s killing in 2022 – some of whom were deliberately blinded during protests –, such injuries symbolise both crackdown efforts to cancel out the independent female gaze posing a political threat to the establishment; and the resistance of these injured, yet defiant women bearing mutilated faces, who are living proof of Iranian repression.

History isn’t confined to a distant past of political neutralisation: it is impregnated by women of today’s personal bodily experiences, where eye trauma can be interpreted as exploitative violence and a sign of a political struggle that revolves around the field of vision.

The body becomes ‘capital’: the ultimate sovereignty

The Islamic Republic may have broken away from the monarchy’s sacredness, but the ancient principle by which the body is perceived as capital that holds personal power, is still intact. While monarchs resorted to blinding their subjects in order to protect their dynasties, security forces use mutilation to ensure its survival.

This strategy produces a paradoxical effect. In Persia, blinding was used as a weapon of political destruction in ancient times. Today, it makes the regime’s brutality visible for all to see. As mutilated faces are in circulation, victims become symbols and the eyes they have lost become a testimony to Iran’s profound crisis of democratic legitimacy.

History doesn’t repeat itself but it lives on through gestures. By shooting at the eyes, the Iranian government revives the old rule book for domination: take away an individual’s ability to see and you politically eliminate them.

The Conversation

Firouzeh Nahavandi ne travaille pas, ne conseille pas, ne possède pas de parts, ne reçoit pas de fonds d’une organisation qui pourrait tirer profit de cet article, et n’a déclaré aucune autre affiliation que son organisme de recherche.

ref. Iran’s crackdown: why security forces are shooting demonstrators straight in the eye – https://theconversation.com/irans-crackdown-why-security-forces-are-shooting-demonstrators-straight-in-the-eye-273508

Heated Rivalry: How investment in Canadian content can pay off at home and abroad

Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Daphne Rena Idiz, Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Arts, Culture and Media, University of Toronto

Hudson Williams and Connor Storrie in an Episode 6 (‘The Cottage’) scene of ‘Heated Rivalry.’ (Bell Media)

In late December 2025, it seemed like everyone went to “the cottage.” This is a reference to the steamy Crave megahit Heated Rivalry. Even The Guggenheim Museum of New York and Ottawa Tourism has jumped on the Heated Rivalry bandwagon.

Heated Rivalry has launched the careers of Texas native Connor Storrie and Hudson Williams, from British Columbia. The actors play hockey rivals-turned-lovers Ilya Rozanov and Shane Hollander.




Read more:
_Heated Rivalry_ scores for queer visibility — but also exposes the limits of representation


The Heated Rivalry obsession is widespread, having topped Crave’s No. 1 most-watched spot for weeks and taken global audiences, TV networks and online algorithms by storm.

Storrie and Williams have appeared at the Golden Globes, on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon and on Late Night with Seth Meyers.

In an era where data-crunching increasingly offers predictions about market-driven success, all this might make viewers wonder if Heated Rivalry has cracked the algorithmic code.

Crave trailer for ‘Heated Rivalry.’

Risk-taking gone right

Was the show a bet on #booktok fans? Heated Rivalry is based on a book that is part of the popular Game Changers series by Canadian author Rachel Reid.

However, as scholars who have examined contemporary TV production, we agree with acting coach Anna Lamadrid that Heated Rivalry would never have been made if left solely to algorithmic analysis.

The standard algorithm-driven approach designed to entice the widest possible audience — typical of U.S. streaming giants like Netflix — would argue the series had limited appeal, no star power and a niche audience.

More likely, as creator Jacob Tierney told Myles McNutt, a professor of media studies, Crave trusted him and his vision. Tierney previously made the popular and award-winning shows Shoresy and Letterkenny.

As Tierney told McNutt, Heated Rivalry was greenlit by Crave but needed additional financing. Tierney approached several studios, but received notes “that would fundamentally change the story, or fundamentally change the tone.”

In a recent CBS interview with Montréal-born actor François Arnaud, who plays older gay hockey player Scott Hunter, Arnaud said he “didn’t think the show could have been made in the U.S.” He said Heated Rivalry was “at a big streamer before” that wanted changes, including “no kissing until Episode 5.”

Two men in dressy suits leaning against a bar in a fancy environment.
François Arnaud and
Hudson Williams in an Episode 1 scene from ‘Heated Rivalry.’

(Bell Media)

Heated Rivalry is an example of risk-taking gone right at a time when there are calls to cancel international streamers in favour of investing in homegrown film and TV. Its success is also the result of a confluence of industry-level transformations in Canadian production and streaming.

A confluence of conditions

In the 1950s, only a few Canadian broadcasters made content entirely “in-house.” Production and distribution companies were operated by government-funded agencies, including the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and the National Film Board of Canada.

Creative content consisted mostly of news and filmed theatre or dance productions. In the 1960s, pay TV emerged and appetite built for racier variety TV, game shows and talk shows.

By the 1970s, the baby boomer bubble — combined with arts funding and more affordable video and editing equipment — changed everything. Low-cost content for niche audiences proliferated on cable TV.

The Canadian media system moved toward independent production. Production companies were separated from broadcasters, owned and run by different people. But the ability to green-light Canadian-scripted TV shows still depended on acquiring distribution licences from a few major broadcasters.

This triggered funding from the Canada Media Fund and provincial or territorial tax credits, which still finance most productions. To spread financial risk, many dramas were co-productions between Canada and other countries.

By 2005, in the wake of broadband and the growth of more audacious content produced for smaller audiences, Canadian broadcasters shifted to reality (“unscripted”) TV as a relatively inexpensive genre that could draw big audiences.

Still, breakthrough dramatic programs — like Corner Gas (2004-09), Little Mosque on the Prairie (2007-12), Kim’s Convenience (2016-21) and Schitt’s Creek (2015-20) — dealt with the complexity and specificity of Canadian society.

Steamy streaming

Today, several key policy changes and corporate consolidations have brought smaller, riskier and explicitly Canadian projects to the screen.

The Online Streaming Act and the recently updated definition of Canadian content have targeted streaming services like Netflix and Crave to incentivize the production and discoverability of Canadian shows.

Shifts in policy have supported Canadian content, including funding for underrepresented voices. Heated Rivalry’s development ran parallel to recent policy and industry shifts.




Read more:
How do we define Canadian content? Debates will shape how creatives make a living


Bell Media, the largest Canadian media company, owns CTV and Crave. In March 2025, it acquired a majority stake of United Kingdom-based global distributor Sphere Abacus. This played a key role in Heated Rivalry’s development.

The Canada Media Fund contributed $3.1 million to Heated Rivalry. Culture Minister Marc Miller has also noted in addition to the federal funding, the series received tax credits. Eligible Canadian film or video productions can receive a refundable tax credit.

Bell Media committed to the show budget in March 2025, including a contribution from recently acquired Sphere Abacus.

Sean Cohan, Bell Media CEO, has said the company saw Heated Rivalry as a show that could move the conglomerate “from being seen as a legacy broadcaster to a digital-media content player with global impact.”

The series was shot in just over a month at a budget of less than CDN$5 million per episode and before long, stars Williams and Storrie were whisked away to the Golden Globes.

What’s next for Canadian productions?

Crave is already promoting Slo Pitch starring Schitt’s Creek actor Emily Hampshire and featuring Heated Rivalry’s Nadine Bhaba.

Set to premiere in 2026, this 10-episode mockumentary series follows a queer, underdog softball team. While the show is also about gay sports, it’s in a league all its own — promising “beer, lesbians and baseball.”

Is Crave a beacon of hope for Canadian content? Maybe Canadian producers and distributors can leverage the Heated Rivalry effect to galvanize Canadian and international audiences onto more Canadian-produced intellectual property (IP).

The issue of IP is now a key sticking point in multiple unresolved lawsuits by Netflix, Amazon and Spotify that have been brought to the federal government.

The looming Warner Bros Discovery (Warner Bros, HBO) acquisition by Netflix will directly impact Crave. As HBO Max’s sole Canadian distributor, there’s some worry about what could happen to this lucrative content for the Canadian streamer should Netflix gobble up all of the IP — a major issue for distribution deals and Canadian creatives.




Read more:
How do we define Canadian content? Debates will shape how creatives make a living


Not to stretch the hockey metaphor too tight, but policy sets the rules of the game. Corporate and government funding bring the players to the rink. Producers and writers aspire to be winning coaches. Audiences want to be on the edge of their seats.

They also want more choices: exploring riskier storylines, meeting new talent and seeing their own lives — and Canadian content — on screen. With Heated Rivalry’s success, they seem to have it all this season.

The Conversation

Daphne Rena Idiz receives funding from the Creative Labour and Critical Futures (CLCF) project.

Claudia Sicondolfo receives funding from SSHRC for Archives in Action and Platforming Leisure and is a Board Member for the Toronto Queer Film Festival.

MaryElizabeth Luka receives funding from University of Toronto Cluster of Scholarly Prominence program (Creative Labour Critical Futures) as well as from periodic competitive, peer-adjudicated Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council funding programs for research in their areas of expertise.

ref. Heated Rivalry: How investment in Canadian content can pay off at home and abroad – https://theconversation.com/heated-rivalry-how-investment-in-canadian-content-can-pay-off-at-home-and-abroad-272982

Fighting climate change in the Sahel is worsening conflicts – new research shows how

Source: The Conversation – Africa (2) – By Folahanmi Aina, Lecturer in Political Economy of Violence, Conflict and Development, SOAS, University of London

The Sahel, the semi-arid African region stretching from the Atlantic Ocean in the west to the Red Sea in the east, has become the epicentre of global terrorism, given the high number of attacks by armed groups and the resulting fatalities, including those suffered by civilians. This development is rooted in a complex interplay of factors. They include state fragility, illicit economies, limited presence of government in rural areas, and conflicts driven by resource scarcity due to climate shocks.

I am a political scientist with regional expertise in conflict, security and development in west Africa. In a recent policy brief for a research programme, I set out how climate change mitigation efforts in Sahelian communities have intensified pre-existing tensions.

The research involved extensive fieldwork and interviews in July and August 2025 with community members in Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger and Nigeria. The aim was to understand the interaction between various pressure points and crises playing out in their lives.

Livelihoods are under pressure as a result of climate change. Resources are scarce and unevenly allocated. Governance structures are weak and armed groups compete for control.

The findings were clear: climate action can either exacerbate or alleviate crises.

Many climate mitigation efforts are large-scale projects, like building solar farms, extensive reforestation initiatives, or bio-fuel plantations. The Great Green Wall initiative and the Agriculture Climate Resilient Value Chain Development Project in Niger are examples.

These projects are deemed vital for reducing carbon footprints. But carrying them out in fragile states poses a risk. In the Sahel, misconceived environmental security policymaking can have adverse impacts and even fuel the very insecurity it aims to prevent. Top-down approach objectives can be at odds with local social and ecological realities.

I conclude from my findings that the United Nations’ approach to climate change mitigation in the Sahel requires a re-evaluation. What’s needed are adaptation interventions that are:

  • conflict-sensitive

  • community-led and context-specific

  • designed using a transboundary process. This is because interventions are capable of shaping political economies, security arrangements and community relations across borders, not just within them.

A fragile environment

My research confirms that climate change in Sahelian communities has intensified pre-existing tensions. These include:

Insecurity: Local populations are exposed to conflicts that are made worse by climate-induced pressures. This includes farmer-herder disputes over diminishing grazing land, intercommunal clashes for access to scarce water resources, and ethno-religious tensions aggravated by competition over livelihood opportunities.

Interviews conducted with farmers, pastoralists and community heads, among others, highlighted how shifts in rainfall patterns, long droughts and unpredictable harvests are directly undermining livelihoods. People are being forced into daily coping strategies that sometimes heighten local conflicts.

State fragility: Interviews with key informants, including local vigilantes, paint a picture of governments’ inability to provide security, deliver basic services or mediate rising disputes.

As a result communities have been forced to find alternative forms of governance and protection. These include local vigilante groups, traditional community elders and informal resource management committees.

Criminal networks: Climate vulnerability and state fragility have created an environment that allows violent extremist organisations to operate and expand their influence. These groups range from armed bandits to violent extremist organisations such as Boko Haram and Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM). They are not merely a result of ideology. They are consequences of a system in distress. They strategically exploit the insecurities and grievances that climate change and state fragility have created.

A Malian community leader put it perfectly. He warned that if a community

becomes a dry land … the armed group can use this opportunity to install themselves.

Towards a conflict-sensitive approach

Statements from people interviewed reflect simple, yet profound, solutions.

The central message is the need for local ownership and community involvement.

A traditional ruler from Burkina Faso, for instance, insisted that:

if projects come, they must include the community from the beginning, to ensure people feel respected, build trust, and ensure that solutions respond to real needs.

A respondent in Nigeria, too, said that “when the locals engage with government many solutions come aboard”. In Niger, a local actor stressed the need to “involve the population more in the decision-making process concerning them”.

These comments point to policy directives. They argue for a departure from the top-down, expert-driven model of development.

For climate change mitigation to be a force for peace, it must be integrated with peacebuilding and state-building efforts. Involving local authorities and community-level institutions in making decisions can lead to interventions that are context-sensitive, legitimate and responsive to local realities.

This translates to linking climate finance to projects that provide not only renewable energy infrastructure but also schools, health centres and sustainable livelihoods. It means transparent, community-led dialogue to resolve conflicts before they escalate across the Sahel region.

Next steps

The Sahel’s plight is a powerful lesson for the global community. The interconnectedness of climate change, state fragility and conflict is a complex adaptive system. It cannot be solved with single-sector interventions. The challenges are too intertwined, and the stakes are too high.

International development and climate policy must shift. Climate change mitigation is not a technical exercise, but an opportunity to rebuild broken social contracts, foster community resilience and promote equitable development.

Addressing root causes instead of symptoms can turn a vicious cycle of fragility into one of peace and development.

The Conversation

Folahanmi Aina does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Fighting climate change in the Sahel is worsening conflicts – new research shows how – https://theconversation.com/fighting-climate-change-in-the-sahel-is-worsening-conflicts-new-research-shows-how-273673

La génération Z souffre davantage d’épuisement professionnel que toute autre génération. Voici pourquoi et ce qui peut être fait

Source: The Conversation – in French – By Nitin Deckha, Lecturer in Justice Studies, Early Childhood Studies, Community and Social Services and Electives, University of Guelph-Humber

Les travailleurs de la génération Z font état de niveaux d’épuisement professionnel parmi les plus élevés jamais enregistrés, et de nouvelles recherches suggèrent qu’ils croulent sous un stress sans précédent.

Si les personnes de tous âges affichent des niveaux d’épuisement professionnel, la génération Z et la génération Y signalent un « pic d’épuisement professionnel » à un âge plus précoce. Aux États-Unis, un sondage réalisé auprès de 2 000 adultes a révélé qu’un quart des Américains sont épuisés avant l’âge de 30 ans.

De même, une étude britannique a mesuré l’épuisement professionnel sur une période de 18 mois après la pandémie de Covid-19 et a révélé que les jeunes de la génération Z signalaient des niveaux d’épuisement professionnel de 80 %. Des niveaux plus élevés d’épuisement professionnel parmi la cohorte de la génération Z ont également été signalés par la BBC il y a quelques années.

Une enquête menée dans 11 pays auprès de plus de 13 000 employés et cadres de première ligne a révélé que les travailleurs de la génération Z étaient plus susceptibles de se sentir épuisés (83 %) que les autres employés (75 %).

Une autre étude internationale sur le bien-être a révélé que près d’un quart des 18-24 ans souffraient d’un « stress ingérable », 98 % d’entre eux déclarant présenter un ou plusieurs symptômes d’épuisement professionnel.

Au Canada, un sondage réalisé par Canadian Business a révélé que 51 % des répondants de la génération Z se sentaient épuisés, un pourcentage inférieur à celui des millénariaux (55 %), mais supérieur à celui des baby-boomers (29 %) et de la génération X (32 %).

En tant qu’enseignant universitaire depuis de nombreuses années auprès d’étudiants de la génération Z et père de deux enfants de cette génération, je trouve stupéfiant le niveau d’épuisement professionnel de la génération Z dans le monde du travail actuel. Plutôt que de rejeter les jeunes travailleurs en les qualifiant de distraits ou trop exigeants en matière d’équilibre entre vie professionnelle et vie privée, nous devrions peut-être considérer qu’ils tirent la sonnette d’alarme sur ce qui ne va pas au travail et sur la manière dont nous pouvons y remédier.


25-35 ans : vos enjeux, est une série produite par La Conversation/The Conversation.

Chacun vit sa vingtaine et sa trentaine à sa façon. Certains économisent pour contracter un prêt hypothécaire quand d’autres se démènent pour payer leur loyer. Certains passent tout leur temps sur les applications de rencontres quand d’autres essaient de comprendre comment élever un enfant. Notre série sur les 25-35 ans aborde vos défis et enjeux de tous les jours.

Qu’est-ce que le l’épuisement professionnel ?

L’épuisement professionnel peut varier d’une personne à l’autre et d’un métier à l’autre, mais les chercheurs s’entendent généralement sur ses caractéristiques fondamentales. Il survient lorsqu’il y a un conflit entre ce qu’un travailleur attend de son emploi et ce que celui-ci exige réellement.

Ce décalage peut prendre plusieurs formes : des tâches professionnelles ambiguës, une surcharge de travail, ou un manque de ressources ou de compétences nécessaires pour répondre aux exigences d’un poste.

En bref, l’épuisement professionnel est plus susceptible de se produire lorsqu’il y a un décalage croissant entre les attentes d’une personne vis-à-vis de son travail et de la réalité. Les jeunes travailleurs, les femmes et les employés ayant moins d’ancienneté sont particulièrement exposés au risque d’épuisement professionnel.

L’épuisement professionnel évolue généralement selon trois dimensions. Si la fatigue en est souvent le premier symptôme perceptible, le deuxième est le cynisme ou la dépersonnalisation, qui conduit à l’aliénation et au détachement du travail. Ce détachement conduit à la troisième dimension de l’épuisement professionnel : une baisse du sentiment d’accomplissement personnel ou d’efficacité personnelle.




À lire aussi :
Comment les Z s’épanouissent au travail dans un marché de l’emploi dominé par la « culture de l’agitation »


Pourquoi la génération Z est-elle particulièrement vulnérable à l’épuisement professionnel ?

La génération Z est vulnérable pour plusieurs raisons. Tout d’abord, de nombreux membres de la génération Z sont entrés sur le marché du travail pendant et après la pandémie de Covid-19.

C’était une période de profonds bouleversements, d’isolement social et de changement des protocoles et des exigences de travail. Ces conditions ont perturbé l’apprentissage informel qui se fait généralement par le biais d’interactions quotidiennes avec des collègues, difficiles à reproduire dans le cadre d’un travail à distance.

Deuxièmement, les pressions économiques générales se sont intensifiées. Comme l’affirme l’économiste américaine Pavlina Tcherneva, « la mort du contrat social et la précarisation des emplois » – l’espoir qu’une formation universitaire déboucherait sur un emploi bien rémunéré – a laissé de nombreux jeunes dans une situation beaucoup plus précaire.

L’intensification des perturbations économiques, l’aggravation des inégalités, l’augmentation des coûts du logement et de la vie et la montée de l’emploi précaire ont exercé une pression financière accrue sur cette génération.

Un troisième facteur est la restructuration du travail qui s’opère sous l’influence de l’intelligence artificielle. Comme l’a écrit Ann Kowal Smith, spécialiste des stratégies en milieu de travail, dans un article récent publié dans Forbes, la génération Z est la première génération à entrer sur un marché du travail défini par une « nouvelle architecture du travail : des horaires hybrides qui fragmentent les relations, une automatisation qui supprime le contexte et des dirigeants trop occupés pour donner l’exemple en matière de jugement ».


Déjà des milliers d’abonnés à l’infolettre de La Conversation. Et vous ? Abonnez-vous gratuitement à notre infolettre pour mieux comprendre les grands enjeux contemporains.


Que peut-on faire ?

Si vous lisez cet article et que vous vous sentez épuisé, la première chose à savoir est que vous ne réagissez pas de manière excessive et que vous n’êtes pas seul. Heureusement, il existe des moyens de s’en remettre.

L’un des remèdes les plus négligés contre l’épuisement professionnel consiste à lutter contre l’aliénation et l’isolement qu’il engendre. La meilleure façon d’y parvenir est de créer des liens et d’établir des relations avec les autres, en commençant par vos collègues de travail. Cela peut être aussi simple que de demander à un collègue comment il va après une réunion, ou d’organiser un café hebdomadaire avec un collègue.




À lire aussi :
La génération Z n’est pas intéressée par la gestion intermédiaire. Voici pourquoi elle devrait l’être


Par ailleurs, il est important d’abandonner l’idée que travailler trop est synonyme de mieux travailler. Fixez des limites au travail en bloquant du temps dans votre agenda et en indiquant clairement votre disponibilité à vos collègues.

Mais les stratégies d’adaptation individuelles ont leurs limites. Les solutions plus fondamentales doivent venir des lieux de travail eux-mêmes. Les employeurs doivent proposer des conditions de travail plus flexibles, notamment en matière de bien-être et de santé mentale. Les dirigeants et les responsables doivent communiquer clairement leurs attentes professionnelles, et les lieux de travail doivent mettre en place des politiques visant à examiner et à redistribuer de manière proactive les charges de travail excessives.

Kowal Smith a également suggéré de mettre en place une nouvelle « architecture d’apprentissage » sur le lieu de travail, qui inclurait le mentorat, fournirait des boucles de rétroaction et récompenserait la curiosité et l’agilité.

Ces efforts conjugués de transformation du lieu de travail pourraient humaniser celui-ci, réduire l’épuisement professionnel et améliorer l’engagement, même à l’ère de l’intelligence artificielle. Un lieu de travail qui convient mieux à la génération Z est finalement plus efficace pour nous tous.

La Conversation Canada

Nitin Deckha est membre de l’Institute for Performance and Learning et de la Canadian Community of Corporate Educators.

ref. La génération Z souffre davantage d’épuisement professionnel que toute autre génération. Voici pourquoi et ce qui peut être fait – https://theconversation.com/la-generation-z-souffre-davantage-depuisement-professionnel-que-toute-autre-generation-voici-pourquoi-et-ce-qui-peut-etre-fait-272142

Dérapages sur Twitter/X : le départ discret des universités

Source: The Conversation – in French – By Denis Carlier, Doctorant en science politique (UQAM) et en histoire (université d’Angers), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM)

Longtemps colonne vertébrale de la sociabilité académique en ligne, Twitter/X se vide désormais de ses universitaires. Le virage idéologique de la plate-forme vers l’extrême droite après son rachat par Elon Musk en 2022 a poussé les chercheurs à ne plus rester passifs : le « Twitter scientifique » se fragmente, puis se dissout, au profit d’un écosystème dispersé… et plus méfiant.

Créée en 2006, Twitter/X s’était imposé comme la plate-forme de prédilection des professions intellectuelles. Malgré le rejet par de nombreux universitaires des positions d’extrême droite d’Elon Musk, beaucoup ont eu du mal à quitter le réseau après son rachat en 2022, faute d’alternative offrant les mêmes ressources professionnelles.

L’attentisme dominait, dans l’espoir qu’une alternative émergerait, freinée par la nécessité d’atteindre une masse critique, en particulier pour les comptes les plus suivis capables d’attirer le public plus passif.

Un sondage publié en juin dernier conclut finalement à un éclatement du « Twitter scientifique », avec à la fois un intérêt renouvelé pour des plates-formes préétablies (YouTube, Instagram, LinkedIn), l’investissement de nouvelles plates-formes (Bluesky, Mastodon) et un retour aux lettres d’information, aux courriels et aux interactions en personne.




À lire aussi :
Grok, l’IA de Musk, est-elle au service du techno-fascisme ?


Élections, émeutes et ingérences : les déclencheurs d’un exode académique

Plusieurs événements auront pu servir de déclencheur au départ de Twitter/X, depuis le rachat lui-même et l’introduction d’un système d’abonnement premium jusqu’à la restauration du compte de Donald Trump, suspendu après l’attaque du Capitole.

Des événements plus locaux ont aussi servi de déclencheur, comme le blocage judiciaire de Twitter/X au Brésil à l’automne 2024, après le refus de Musk de suspendre des comptes liés à la tentative de coup du 8 janvier 2023. En Grande-Bretagne, son soutien aux émeutes anti-immigration de l’été 2024 a également précipité des départs. Le milliardaire avait auparavant amplifié la portée de Tommy Robinson, l’un des artisans des émeutes, en restaurant son compte.

L’événement majeur aura cependant été la réélection de Donald Trump en novembre 2024, à l’issue d’une campagne financée par Elon Musk. L’association des deux noms, la consternation face à une campagne marquée par les mensonges racistes, et les craintes quant aux politiques à venir ont agi comme un électrochoc bien au-delà des États-Unis. Dès novembre, des universitaires très suivis annonçaient leur départ pour Bluesky.

Les événements évoqués ne suffisent toutefois pas à expliquer, à eux seuls, la dissolution du « Twitter universitaire ». S’y ajoutent notamment les frustrations associées à la fin de l’interface de programmation (API) gratuite, utilisée pour de nombreuses recherches empiriques, ou le risque réputationnel pour les comptes les plus influents.

Le risque de harcèlement n’est pas le même pour tous : il concerne particulièrement les femmes, avec des campagnes qui peuvent s’étaler sur des années et mènent rarement à des condamnations.

Dans plusieurs pays, le départ des institutions s’est trouvé motivé par l’ingérence d’Elon Musk dans la politique nationale. Cela a été le cas en Grande-Bretagne après les émeutes de l’été 2024, avec notamment des annonces de départ de la part de la bibliothèque de York University et de la London Metropolitan University.

Ce désengagement est cependant demeuré largement silencieux, d’autres institutions arrêtant simplement de poster de nouveaux messages, dont la London Business School.

En Allemagne et en Autriche, c’est une intervention vidéo d’Elon Musk lors d’un rassemblement du parti d’extrême droite AfD qui a déclenché, en janvier 2025, le départ concerté d’une soixantaine d’universités. Au même moment en France, Polytechnique ou l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales annonçaient leur départ, suivies par d’autres universités. Au Pays-Bas enfin, un phénomène semblable a eu lieu.




À lire aussi :
Grok, est-ce que c’est vrai ? Quand l’IA oriente notre compréhension du monde


Un départ en toute discrétion

Cette tendance a été beaucoup plus discrète en Amérique du Nord. Toutefois, sans en faire grande publicité, les deux tiers des universités du Québec ont bien cessé de mettre à jour leur compte officiel. Le 27 janvier 2025, l’UQAR annonçait en interne sa décision, après avoir stoppé toute communication durant l’automne. Le compte de l’Université de Montréal, non alimenté depuis le 11 février, comprend en description la mention « Ce compte est inactif ». Enfin l’ÉTS publiait le 5 décembre un message annonçant son basculement vers Bluesky, après des mois d’inaction.

Pour la plupart des universités, ce départ a été parfaitement silencieux. On le constate pour l’UQTR (dernier message le 17 octobre 2024), l’UQAT, Polytechnique, ou encore HEC.

L’UQAC (octobre 2021) et le Collège militaire royal Saint-Jean (juin 2024) ont précédé cette vague, cet établissement ayant même supprimé son compte au cours de l’année 2025. Quant au compte de l’Institut national de la recherche scientifique, il est désormais passé en mode « privé ».

Seules six universités québécoises continuent aujourd’hui de communiquer sur Twitter/X : l’UQAM, l’UQO, l’Université Laval, Bishop’s, Concordia et McGill.

Parmi les raisons expliquant le maintien d’un compte institutionnel figure, selon le chercheur en communication Andy Tattersall, une volonté d’éviter l’usurpation d’identité, de laisser ouverte la possibilité de revenir, de maintenir une veille des discussions à propos de l’université et de maximiser la capacité à communiquer. Sur ce dernier point, on peut noter cependant un effondrement de l’engagement avec la fin du Twitter académique. Un tweet de l’UQAM n’atteint aujourd’hui que 100 à 200 personnes, avec un nombre négligeable de clics mensuels.

Parmi les raisons de quitter le réseau figure à l’inverse le risque réputationnel associé à une plate-forme d’extrême droite. La reprise en main du réseau par Elon Musk a également été marquée par des décisions incongrues, annoncée par des réactions impulsives à certains tweets. De quoi susciter une perte de confiance face à un manque de prévisibilité et de constance.


Déjà des milliers d’abonnés à l’infolettre de La Conversation. Et vous ? Abonnez-vous gratuitement à notre infolettre pour mieux comprendre les grands enjeux contemporains.


Fin de la neutralité des plates-formes

En faisant de Twitter/X son bac à sable personnel, Elon Musk rend de plus en plus difficile toute dissociation entre l’homme et le réseau social. Depuis son rachat, la modération des contenus a été considérablement réduite. Coutumier de sorties haineuses, souvent présentées comme de simples provocations pour rire (« pour le lulz »), Musk partage également des messages d’autres comptes pour en amplifier la diffusion – une pratique qui fait l’objet d’une plainte en France, déposée par la boxeuse algérienne Imane Khelif.

Le milliardaire est aussi engagé personnellement dans la guerre contre les sciences de l’administration Trump. Il y contribue notamment à travers l’outil conversationnel Grok, intégré à Twitter/X en novembre 2023. En novembre 2025, Grok faisait l’apologie de la Shoah. Deux mois plus tard, l’outil était utilisé pour générer des images pédopornographiques ou « déshabiller » des femmes par hypertrucage (deepfake).

Au-delà des prises de position d’Elon Musk, la droitisation de Twitter/X a accentué des dérives déjà présentes. Le harcèlement et la haine, autrefois perçus comme des abus, s’imposent désormais comme des traits centraux du réseau. L’échec relatif d’un « Bluesky académique » et le retour à des formats plus traditionnels, comme l’infolettre, relancent enfin la question d’un déclin des réseaux sociaux, marqué par une baisse globale du nombre de messages publiés, au profit de la simple consultation (lurking).

La Conversation Canada

Denis Carlier a reçu des financements du Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada (CRSH), du Réseau québécois en études féministes (RÉQEF) et de la Société québécoise de science politique (SQSP). Il possède un compte Twitter, inactif depuis plusieurs années.

ref. Dérapages sur Twitter/X : le départ discret des universités – https://theconversation.com/derapages-sur-twitter-x-le-depart-discret-des-universites-270209

Deep in the Amazon, I discovered this monkey’s ingenious survival tactic

Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Adrian Barnett, Senior Lecturer in Behavioural Ecology, University of Greenwich

The red-nosed cuxiu is endangered. Cavan-Images/Shutterstock

Look down at the rainforest floor. Rotting flowers shift under the assault of tiny petal-eating beetles. Vividly coloured fungi pop up everywhere like the strange sculptures of a madly productive ceramicist.

Look in front of you and heliconias and calatheas, tropical plants familiar from garden centres and greenhouses, vie for the attention of hummingbirds with scarlet and orange flowers.

Look up and the distant canopy offers a full spectrum of shades of green, along with clusters of flowers and fruits in a bewildering range of shades, shapes and sizes.

You’d be excused from thinking that life in a tropical forest is easy. A lazy arm movement being all that’s needed to secure the next mouthful of food. But it’s not like that at all.

Life in the rainforest demands extraordinary adaptations.

Which is why I found myself stepping out of a small canoe on the Tapajós
River in Brazil’s central Amazon to collect the remnants of the most recent meal of the endangered red-nosed cuxiu monkey (Chiropotes albinasus) for my recent study.

They are like no other monkey on Earth. Many species have ecological parallels on other continents, often with very similar physical and behavioural adaptations. For example, spider monkeys and gibbons, chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys. But cuxius, and their close relatives the uacaris and sakis, are a uniquely South American phenomenon.

Cuxius are cat-sized animals, with canines bigger than human teeth, even though their skull is the size of an orange. Although other primates have massive canines too (think baboons, mandrills or chimps) these are for display. Those of the cuxiu are the real deal; designed for cracking open hard, unripe fruits to get at the equally unripe and hard seeds. They eat a range of fruits that include relatives of the Brazil nut, acacia tree and oleander.

Humans would need a hammer to crack open this kind of fruit. But cuxius and their near relations bite them open. Powered by massive muscles, the jaws can deliver a bite which, if scaled for size, is equal to that of a jaguar. They eat hundreds of rock-hard fruits a week, tens of thousands over their ten-year life span.

So, I wanted to know: how do they avoid cracking their teeth along with the nuts? We know their skulls are evolved to disperse the shock of a bite. But scientists have long been mystified by how the cuxiu avoids breaking its teeth through the sheer repetitive strain.

My findings revealed that cuxius are a lot smarter and more subtle than anyone thought.

Pick up a walnut and you’ll notice a thin line running around the hard shell. This is the suture, and it’s where the shell would naturally break open to free the seed when it ripens. It’s also a lot less resistant to puncture than the rest of the fruit. Fruits with sutures dominate the diet of the red-nosed cuxiu, so I wondered if this could be the key to the cuxiu’s success.

Measurements of the force needed for a copy of a cuxiu canine to penetrate fruit outer husks showed this was the case. It took up to 70% less force to go in at the suture than elsewhere on the fruits the cuxiu ate.

Close up of black long-haired monkey with pink face
The red-faced spider monkey is an ateline monkey, with a highly athletic lifestyle.
Diego Grandi/Shutterstock

My examination of skulls held in London’s Natural History Museum showed canine breakages were no more common in cuxius than in capuchins (which use either their molars or stone tools to break hard fruits) or ateline monkeys (which eat either soft pulpy fruits or leaves). Avoiding dental damage is smart – with no dentists in the forest a split tooth is a quick path to a slow death by starvation. And it allows the cuxius and their relatives to access unripe seeds, a food source few other animals can exploit.

This mirrors tactics used by carnivores like big cats, who bite prey at vulnerable spots to avoid breaking their teeth.

Then there’s the fact that every animal in the rainforest needs to be its own doctor, physiotherapist and fitness coach. With no first aid stations for bitten, twisted or shocked bodies, it’s best to avoid things going wrong in the first place. This is also true for actions that, through sheer repetition, could cause breakage through stress.

Survival in the rainforest depends on vigilance, cunning survival strategies and Olympian levels of fitness. An animal’s survival depends not only on knowing what to eat but how to eat it. Seconds count when a bite too many can mean missing the one key glance skywards that stops you becoming someone else’s breakfast.

Living in the top of the canopy of either rainforest or flooded forest, moving huge distances and doing so very fast, makes cuxius a challenge to observe. I first became interested in cuxius and uacaris because they are hard to study and, as a result, were so little known. But, soon after I started working with them, I realised cuxius and uacaris are like extreme sports athletes, pushing the boundary of what is possible in a monkey.

And they aren’t the only ones.

Swinging and hanging between the trees, the life of a spider monkey is like a perpetual parallel bar performance, not for a few brief minutes, after months of rigourous training as in humans, but all day, every day. No gold medal and long retirement, just surviving till dusk and starting again at dawn.

Additionally, while not exactly Olympian, the energy howler monkeys use during their daily calling bouts is similar to that of a mid-aria opera singer. Except that the monkeys must perform twice a day for a lifetime.

Sadly, animals’ Olympian abilities are no match for humans, whose use of tools is the equivalent of competitors using steroids or robotic enhancements. And, since it is clear that humans are not as smart as we are skilled, rainforest loss continues at a pace that even evolution – formerly the world’s best trainer – cannot have prepared them for.

The Conversation

Adrian Barnett does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Deep in the Amazon, I discovered this monkey’s ingenious survival tactic – https://theconversation.com/deep-in-the-amazon-i-discovered-this-monkeys-ingenious-survival-tactic-271995

Europe has five options for responding to Trump’s Greenland threats. None of them look good

Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Jun Du, Professor of Economics, Centre Director of Centre for Business Prosperity (CBP), Aston University

Johannes Madsen/Shutterstock

European negotiators believed they had bought stability in July 2025 amid the global trade turmoil sparked by Donald Trump’s liberation day tariffs. The EU’s deal with the US involved eliminating tariffs on American goods, purchasing US energy and committing to American investment. But six months later, as the US president made his intentions regarding Greenland clear, it collapsed.

Trump has now threatened new tariffs on eight European countries, the UK among them. The tariffs punish countries that sent military personnel to Greenland in support of Danish sovereignty.

The president has said 10% tariffs will apply to all goods entering the US from the eight countries from February 1, rising to 25% on June 1 until he is able to buy territory.

This isn’t an aberration. The US offered to buy Greenland in 1946. And before that it purchased Alaska (in 1867, from Russia), Florida (in 1821, from Spain) and Louisiana (in 1803, from France). What’s different now is the coercion mechanism – tariffs rather than a negotiated price.

Greenland offers Arctic shipping routes, rare earth deposits and missile defence positioning. Trump’s “Golden Dome” defence system needs more than military bases – it requires sovereign control to deploy classified systems without Danish oversight.

This is the same logic that drove pressure on Panama to renegotiate US control of the canal. This showed how existing arrangements aren’t enough – Washington wants exclusive control.

The tariff threats serve multiple purposes: punishing countries that showed solidarity with Denmark, testing whether economic pressure can fracture Nato from within, and of course generating revenue.

US tariff income hit US$264 billion (£197 billion) in 2025, up US$185 billion from 2024 after new tariffs kicked in. This is a windfall that makes security dependent allies who cannot retaliate reliable payers.

The usual playbook won’t work

When China faced US tariffs in 2025, it retaliated hard. China targeted soybeans from swing states, restricted rare earths with new export licences and slowed regulatory approvals for US tech companies. Beijing could absorb pain and inflict it back. That was a trade war fought with trade weapons.

Europe’s position is different. Brussels is now discussing the anti-coercion instrument – the so-called “trade bazooka”.

This law gives the EU teeth to hit back against economic blackmail from a non-EU country and overrides existing trade deals. In practice, this could restrict US companies from public procurement and impose retaliatory tariffs on €93 billion (£81 billion) of American goods.




Read more:
Tariffs may bring a US$50 billion monthly boost to the US government. But ordinary Americans won’t feel the benefit


But the EU requires unanimity for serious trade retaliation, and member states differ vastly in their US market exposure and Nato security dependence. Any serious escalation risks the security guarantee, a constraint China never faced.

And these tariffs aren’t really about trade anyway. Fighting a territorial objective with trade weapons is bringing the wrong tools to the job.

If trade diplomacy cannot solve a territorial problem, what can? The conventional playbook offers escalating retaliation — measured responses or catastrophic threats meant to deter a rational actor. But that assumes your opponent isn’t playing a game where brinkmanship is the point. Given those constraints, we have identified five options. None of them is comfortable.

1. Accept the new reality

Treat US tariffs as a permanent feature of transatlantic trade rather than a disruption to negotiate away. Price them into business planning and stop expending political capital on deals that probably won’t hold.

2. Diversify faster

The EU-Mercosur agreement signed in the same week between Brussels and the South American trading bloc wasn’t a coincidence. It was agreed in the knowledge that higher US tariffs were a distinct possibility one day.

For the UK, diversifying means accelerating its own negotiations (the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership – CPTPP, the Gulf and India). Every percentage point shifted from the US reduces Washington’s leverage.

3. Address the security dependence

European defence spending has risen sharply since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine — from €251 billion in 2021 to €343 billion in 2024. But capability takes longer than building up budgets. The Greenland tariffs illustrate the cost of dependence. When your security guarantor becomes your economic coercer, your options narrow dramatically.

4. Reconsider the UK-EU relationship

The crisis creates opportunity for both sides. These options require coordination across member states with vastly different US exposure and Nato dependence. Bringing Britain closer strengthens Europe’s negotiating position while giving the UK strategic options beyond an increasingly transactional US relationship.

The slow reset has been constrained by reluctance to make Brexit look costless. But when both face a direct challenge to the post-war order from their principal security guarantor, the calculation changes. Closer alignment becomes mutual strategic necessity.

5. Hold the line together

The worst outcome would be European countries peeling away from Denmark to escape tariffs. That is precisely what the policy is designed to achieve. This is the logic of political deterrence, which would suggest that showing solidarity will prevent further demands. If this cracks, there is likely to be more of the same from the US.

Whether Trump will ultimately acquire Greenland remains uncertain. Conventional wisdom says he won’t, but conventional wisdom has been wrong before. What’s clear is that this isn’t a tariff dispute requiring trade concessions. It’s a structural shift in transatlantic relations, and European strategy needs to adjust accordingly.

The Conversation

The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Europe has five options for responding to Trump’s Greenland threats. None of them look good – https://theconversation.com/europe-has-five-options-for-responding-to-trumps-greenland-threats-none-of-them-look-good-273885

What a bear attack in a remote valley in Nepal tells us about the problem of aging rural communities

Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Geoff Childs, Professor of Sociocultural Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis

Dorje Dundul ponders a life living with increased risk of bear attacks. Geoff Childs, CC BY-SA

Dorje Dundul recently had his foot gnawed by a brown bear – a member of the species Ursus thibetanus, to be precise.

It wasn’t his first such encounter. Recounting the first of three such violent experiences over the past five years, Dorje told our research team: “My wife came home one evening and reported that a bear had eaten a lot of corn from the maize field behind our house. So, we decided to shoo it away. While my wife was setting up camp, I went to see how much the bear had eaten. The bear was just sitting there; it attacked me.”

Dorje dropped to the ground, but the bear ripped open his shirt and tore at his shoulder. “I started shouting and the bear ran away. My wife came, thinking I was messing with her, but when she saw the wounds, she knew what had happened.”

Researchers Dolma Choekyi Lama, Tsering Tinley and I spoke with Dorje – a 71-year-old resident of Nubri, a Buddhist enclave in the Nepalese highlands – as part of a three-year study of aging and migration.

Now, you may be forgiven for asking what a bear attack on a septuagenarian has to do with demographic change in Nepal. The answer, however, is everything.

In recent years, people across Nepal have witnessed an increase in bear attacks, a phenomenon recorded in news reports and academic studies.

Inhabitants of Nubri are at the forefront of this trend – and one of the main reasons is outmigration. People, especially young people, are leaving for education and employment opportunities elsewhere. It is depleting household labor forces, so much so that over 75% of those who were born in the valley and are now ages 5 to 19 have left and now live outside of Nubri.

It means that many older people, like Dorje and his wife, Tsewang, are left alone in their homes. Two of their daughters live abroad and one is in the capital, Kathmandu. Their only son runs a trekking lodge in another village.

Scarcity of ‘scarebears’

Until recently, when the corn was ripening, parents dispatched young people to the fields to light bonfires and bang pots all night to ward off bears. The lack of young people acting as deterrents, alongside the abandonment of outlying fields, is tempting bears to forage closer to human residences.

Outmigration in Nubri and similar villages is due in large part to a lack of educational and employment opportunities. The problems caused by the removal of younger people have been exacerbated by two other factors driving a rapidly aging population: People are living longer due to improvements in health care and sanitation; and fertility has declined since the early 2000s, from more than six to less than three births per woman.

These demographic forces have been accelerating population aging for some time, as illustrated by the population pyramid constructed from our 2012 household surveys in Nubri and neighboring Tsum.

A not-so-big surprise, anymore

Nepal is not alone in this phenomenon; similar dynamics are at play elsewhere in Asia. The New York Times reported in November 2025 that bear attacks are on the rise in Japan, too, partly driven by demographic trends. Farms there used to serve as a buffer zone, shielding urban residents from ursine intruders. However, rural depopulation is allowing bears to encroach on more densely populated areas, bringing safety concerns in conflict with conservation efforts.

Dorje can attest to those concerns. When we met him in 2023 he showed us deep claw marks running down his shoulder and arm, and he vowed to refrain from chasing away bears at night.

So in October 2025, Dorje and Tsewang harvested a field before marauding bears could get to it and hauled the corn to their courtyard for safekeeping. The courtyard is surrounded by stone walls piled high with firewood – not a fail-safe barrier but at least a deterrent. They covered the corn with a plastic tarp, and for extra measure Dorje decided to sleep on the veranda.

He described what happened next:

“I woke to a noise that sounded like ‘sharak, sharak.’ I thought it must be a bear rummaging under the plastic. Before I could do anything, the bear came up the stairs. When I shouted, it got frightened, roared and yanked at my mattress. Suddenly my foot was being pulled and I felt pain.”

Dorje suffered deep lacerations to his foot. Trained in traditional Tibetan medicine, he staunched the bleeding using, ironically, a tonic that contained bear liver.

Yet his life was still in danger due to the risk of infection. It took three days and an enormous expense by village standards – equivalent to roughly US$2,000 – before they could charter a helicopter to Kathmandu for further medical attention.

And Dorje is not the only victim. An elderly woman from another village bumped into a bear during a nocturnal excursion to her outhouse. It left her with a horrific slash from forehead to chin – and her son scrambling to find funds for her evacuation and treatment.

A woman in the foreground bendds over infront of a valley
A woman weeding freshly planted corn across the valley from Trok, Nubri.
Geoff Childs, CC BY-SA

So how should Nepal’s highlanders respond to the increase in bear attacks?

Dorje explained that in the past they set lethal traps when bear encroachments became too dangerous. That option vanished with the creation of Manaslu Conservation Area Project, or MCAP, in the 1990s, a federal initiative to manage natural resources that strictly prohibits the killing of wild animals.

Learning to grin and bear it?

Dorje reasons that if MCAP temporarily relaxed the regulation, villagers could band together to cull the more hostile bears. He informed us that MCAP officials will hear nothing of that option, yet their solutions, such as solar-powered electric fencing, haven’t worked.

Dorje is reflective about the options he faces as young people leave the village, leaving older folk to battle the bears alone.

“At first, I felt that we should kill the bear. But the other side of my heart says, perhaps I did bad deeds in my past life, which is why the bear bit me. The bear came to eat corn, not to attack me. Killing it would just be another sinful act, creating a new cycle of cause and effect. So, why get angry about it?”

It remains to be seen how Nubri’s residents will respond to the mounting threats bears pose to their lives and livelihoods. But one thing is clear: For those who remain behind, the outmigration of younger residents is making the perils more imminent and the solutions more challenging.

Dolma Choekyi Lama and Tsering Tinley made significant contributions to this article. Both are research team members on the author’s project on population in an age of migration.

The Conversation

Geoff Childs receives funding from the National Science Foundation.

ref. What a bear attack in a remote valley in Nepal tells us about the problem of aging rural communities – https://theconversation.com/what-a-bear-attack-in-a-remote-valley-in-nepal-tells-us-about-the-problem-of-aging-rural-communities-271377