Jane Austen perfected the love story – but kept her own independence

Source: The Conversation – UK – By Anna Walker, Senior Arts + Culture Editor, The Conversation

Jane Austen’s Paper Trail is a podcast from The Conversation celebrating 250 years since Jane Austen’s birth. In each episode, we’ll be investigating a different aspect of Austen’s personality by interrogating one of her novels with leading Austen researchers. Along the way we’ll visit locations important to Austen to uncover a particular aspect of her life and the times she lived in. In episode 2, we look at Jane the romantic, through the pages of Pride and Prejudice.

Every heroine in a Jane Austen novel ends up married. It is the bow on the end of every story that ties up all the loose threads – seemingly the ultimate happy ending. However, while marriage is an conclusion she chose for her characters, it is not one she chose for herself.

Austen did have suitors – most famously the dashing Irishman Thomas Lefroy, with whom she had a brief but intense flirtation. There were even proposals, notably one in 1802 from Harris Bigg-Wither, the wealthy brother of a friend, which she accepted only to promptly break off the very next morning.

It seems likely that Austen chose singledom, even though she was clearly preoccupied with romance and marriage. Many readers consider her one of history’s greatest writers of romance.

That her novels centre on love and marriage has sometimes led critics to dismiss them as light or frivolous. But beneath every courtship and proposal lies a sharp commentary on class, money, morality and the limited choices available to women in Georgian England.

Austen’s heroines are smart, capable women – often more so than the men in their lives, many of whom have made choices that have left their families in financial straits. But these middle-class women are unable to work and so must pursue the only option really available to them, marriage.

Nowhere is this tension clearer than in Austen’s second novel, Pride and Prejudice. Published in 1813, it follows Elizabeth Bennet – bright, outspoken, and sceptical of society’s conventions. Unluckily for her, she has a mother who is obsessed with securing suitable marriages for her and her four sisters – an obsession that is sent into overdrive when the eligible Mr Bingley moves into the neighbourhood, bringing his arrogant but equally eligible friend Mr Darcy with him.

In the second episode of Jane Austen’s Paper Trail, as we explore romance in the world of Jane Austen, Naomi Joseph visits a Regency ball at the Grand Assembly Rooms in York with Meg Kobza. An expert in the Georgian social calendar, at Newcastle University, Kobza has produced similar recreations at the Bath Assembly Rooms – where Austen attended balls and was courted by several men.

As dancers in all manner of Regency dress attempt a minuet in the soft candlelight of the main ballroom, Kobza helps us understand the complicated relationship Austen had with romance.

Over the course of Pride and Prejudice, Lizzie, and the other women in her life, must navigate their feelings on the whole institution of marriage. There are marriages of convenience, potentially socially ruinous unions, hasty weddings, quiet passions and, of course, love matches – and Austen seems to have opinions on them all.

“Jane herself was dependent on her father and then later her brothers for financial security. And we see in many of her novels financial security is driving a lot of her heroines to opt for or against certain matches,” says Kobza. “If you didn’t get married at all, you became a spinster, you’re a burden to your family.”

Later on in the episode, Anna Walker takes a deeper dive into Austen’s view of romance in Pride and Prejudice with two more experts. Octavia Cox is a lecturer in 18th and 19th century literature at the University of Oxford, and founder of the popular YouTube channel All Things Classic Literature. Joining her round the table is Adam J. Smith, an associate professor in English literature at York, St. John University who researches satire and the gothic, romantic and sentimental genres.

As Cox explains, Pride and Prejudice is “a joyful love story in that the two central characters, Darcy and Lizzie talk about and value happiness and how to achieve happiness. But there’s a lot more going on too.” Smith agrees: “The more I read Austen, the more I feel that all of the books are really about how to read and understand and interpret the world.”

Listen to episode 2 of Jane Austen’s Paper Trail wherever you get your podcasts. If you’re craving more Austen, check out our Jane Austen 250 page for more expert articles celebrating the anniversary.

Disclosure statement:

Meg Kobza recieved funding from the Leverhulme Trust and the British Academy and the Society of Antiquaries funded the Bath fancy dress pop up ball and exhibition.

Adam J Smith sits on the Senate of the British Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies, which is a registered charity.

Octavia Cox does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.


Jane Austen’s Paper Trail is hosted by Anna Walker with reporting from Jane Wright and Naomi Joseph. Senior producer and sound designer is Eloise Stevens and the executive producer is Gemma Ware. Artwork by Alice Mason and Naomi Joseph.

Listen to The Conversation Weekly via any of the apps listed above, download it directly via our RSS feed or find out how else to listen here.

The Conversation

ref. Jane Austen perfected the love story – but kept her own independence – https://theconversation.com/jane-austen-perfected-the-love-story-but-kept-her-own-independence-269048

Prince William: We told the kids everything about Kate’s cancer

Source: Radio New Zealand

Prince William says it was a “balancing act” for himself and his wife to share details of the family’s recent health challenges, including Catherine’s and King Charles’s cancer diagnoses.

In a rare and candid interview in Brazil, the prince said that “hiding stuff from them doesn’t work”.

He was responding to a question about how the couple had approached difficult moments with their three children — Prince George, 12, Princess Charlotte, 10, and Prince Louis, seven.

The princess spoke about her cancer diagnosis in a video in early 2024, after months of speculation about her health.

supplied/BBC news

What do end-of-life doulas do?

Wellbeing

Earlier this year Princess Catherine said her cancer treatment was “like a roller-coaster”, after revealing in January she was in remission.

The 43-year-old announced in March last year that she was undergoing treatment after tests following major abdominal surgery revealed she had cancer. She has never spoken publicly about the type of cancer.

King Charles also announced last year that he was receiving treatment for an undisclosed form of cancer, for which he is still receiving treatment.

“Every family has its own difficulties and its own challenges,” Prince William said in an interview with Brazilian TV host Luciano Huck.

“I think it’s very individual and sort of moment-dependent as to how you deal with those problems.

“We choose to communicate a lot more with our children, now that has its good things and its bad things.

“Sometimes you feel you’re oversharing with the children [and] you probably shouldn’t.

“But most of the time, hiding stuff from them doesn’t work.”

The Prince of Wales said explaining to the children “how they feel” and “why that’s happening” could sometimes help give them “a bigger picture”.

(L-R) Britain's Prince George of Wales, Britain's Catherine, Princess of Wales, Britain's King Charles III and Britain's Queen Camilla attend The Royal British Legion Festival of Remembrance event at the Royal Albert Hall, in London, on November 8, 2025 ahead of Remembrance Day commemorations. (Photo by Jack Taylor / POOL / AFP)

King Charles, pictured with Prince George and Kate as well as Queen Camilla, is continuing to receive treatment for cancer.

AFP / JACK TAYLOR

“They can relax more into it rather than being really anxious about ‘what are you hiding from me?'” he said.

“There are a lot more questions when there are no answers.

“How much do I say? What do I say? When do I say it?”

William spoke to Huck in Rio de Janeiro ahead of the Earthshot Prize awards ceremony earlier this month. He is the founder of the awards.

The prize, now in its fifth year, encourages inventors and entrepreneurs to develop technologies to combat global warming and mitigate its impact.

The prince later attended the 30th UN Climate Change Conference, known as COP30, in Belém.

William also said the couple’s three children did not have phones.

He said Prince George might be allowed to have a phone with “limited access” when he attended secondary school next year.

“It’s really hard,” he said.

“We communicate why we don’t think it’s right, and again, I think it’s the internet access I have a problem with.

“I think children can access too much stuff they don’t need to see online.”

Recently, the Princess of Wales warned that smartphones and other digital devices threatened the development of young children, in an essay published by Catherine’s Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Review: Booker Prize winner, Flesh, ‘baffling in its blankness’

Source: Radio New Zealand

This year’s winner of the Booker Prize, Flesh by David Szalay, will divide your book club. It has already divided early readers.

Now, after claiming one of the biggest literary prizes in the English-speaking world, it will split a new section of readers.

The division was there in the unfolding comments of the livestream of the prize ceremony in London.

The Land in Winter by Andrew Miller - book and author photo

Hodder & Stoughton/Rob Macdougall

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Israeli hostage on his near 500-day ordeal: ‘Every morning I choose life’

Source: Radio New Zealand

On 7 October 2023, Eli Sharabi was kidnapped by Hamas and held for 491 days.

He and his wife Lianne and two teenage daughters Noiya and Yahel were in their home on a kibbutz in Southern Israel when the attack happened.

When Sharabi and his wife realised he was likely going to be kidnapped they made the “cold” decision to protect their daughters.

Palestinian Hamas fighters escort Israeli hostages (L-R) Ohad Ben Ami, Or Levy and Eli Sharabi on a stage before handing them over to a Red Cross team in Deir el-Balah, central Gaza, on 8 February 2025.

Palestinian Hamas fighters escort Israeli hostages (L-R) Ohad Ben Ami, Or Levy and Eli Sharabi on a stage before handing them over to a Red Cross team in Deir el-Balah, central Gaza, on 8 February 2025.

Abdel Kareem Hana / AP via CNN

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Hungarian British author David Szalay wins Booker Prize for his novel ‘Flesh’

Source: Radio New Zealand

Hungarian British author David Szalay has won the prestigious Booker Prize, worth £50,000 (NZ$116,713), for his dark but strangely humorous book, Flesh.

The novel charts the life of the taciturn loner István, living in a housing estate in Hungary. His life is shaped by the affair he has as a teenager with his middle-aged neighbour.

Jumping forward in time each chapter, Flesh takes István from his small hometown to the Middle East, where he waits for a flight home after serving in the Iraq War.

The Booker Prize 2025 shortlist.

Roddy Doyle, chair of the Booker judges, called this year’s shortlisted books “brilliantly written and brilliantly human”.

Yuki Sugiura for Booker Prize Foundation

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Electric fields steered nanoparticles through a liquid-filled maze – this new method could improve drug delivery and purification systems

Source: The Conversation – USA – By Daniel K. Schwartz, Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder

Nanoparticles move through materials like tiny cars through a maze. OsakaWayne Studios/Moment via Getty Images

In the home, the lab and the factory, electric fields control technologies such as Kindle displays, medical diagnostic tests and devices that purify cancer drugs. In an electric field, anything with an electrical charge – from an individual atom to a large particle – experiences a force that can be used to push it in a desired direction.

When an electric field pushes charged particles in a fluid, the process is called electrophoresis. Our research team is investigating how to harness electrophoresis to move tiny particles – called nanoparticles – in porous, spongy materials. Many emerging technologies, including those used in DNA analysis and medical diagnostics, use these porous materials.

Figuring out how to control the tiny charged particles as they travel through these environments can make them faster and more efficient in existing technologies. It can also enable entirely new smart functions.

Ultimately, scientists are aiming to make particles like these serve as tiny nanorobots. These could perform complex tasks in our bodies or our surroundings. They could search for tumors and deliver treatments or seek out sources of toxic chemicals in the soil and convert them to benign compounds.

To make these advances, we need to understand how charged nanoparticles travel through porous, spongy materials under the influence of an electric field. In a new study, published Nov. 10, 2025, in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, our team of engineering researchers led by Anni Shi and Siamak Mirfendereski sought to do just that.

Weak and strong electric fields

Imagine a nanoparticle as a tiny submarine navigating a complex, interconnected, liquid-filled maze while simultaneously experiencing random jiggling motion. While watching nanoparticles move through a porous material, we observed a surprising behavior related to the strength of the applied electric field.

A weak electric field acts only as an accelerator, boosting the particle’s speed and dramatically improving its chance of finding any exit from a cavity, but offering no directional guidance – it’s fast, but random.

In contrast, a strong electric field provides the necessary “GPS coordinates,” forcing the particle to move rapidly in a specific, predictable direction across the network.

This discovery was puzzling but exciting, because it suggested that we could control the nanoparticles’ motion. We could choose to have them move fast and randomly with a weak field or directionally with a strong field.

The former allows them to search the environment efficiently while the latter is ideal for delivering cargo. This puzzling behavior prompted us to look more closely at what the weak field was doing to the surrounding fluid.

A diagram showing tiny particles in a porous material. On the left they are searching without direction – by moving from cavity to cavity randomly, labeled 'weak field' – and on the right they are drifting in a particular direction – by escaping from each cavity toward the neighboring cavity dictated by the electric field, labeled 'strong field'
This diagram shows how a particle moves through a porous material over time in a weak or strong electric field. The darkest color indicates the starting point of the particle, and successively lighter colors represent the particle’s position after more time has passed. The particle in a weak field moves randomly, while the particle in a strong field gradually moves in the direction determined by the electric field.
Anni Shi

By studying the phenomenon more closely, we discovered the reasons for these behaviors. A weak field causes the stagnant liquid to flow in random swirling motions within the material’s tiny cavities. This random flow enhances a particle’s natural jiggling and pushes it toward the cavity walls. By moving along walls, the particle drastically increases its probability of finding a random escape route, compared to searching throughout the entire cavity space.

A strong field, however, provides a powerful directional push to the particle. That push overcomes the natural jiggling of the particle as well as the random flow of the surrounding liquid. It ensures that the particle migrates predictably along the direction of the electric field. This insight opens the door for new, efficient strategies to move, sort and separate particles.

Tracking nanoparticles

To conduct this research, we integrated laboratory observation with computational modeling. Experimentally, we used an advanced microscope to meticulously track how individual nanoparticles moved inside a perfectly structured porous material called a silica inverse opal.

A zoomed in microscope image of a porous material, which is made up of small circles, each with three small cavities, arranged in a grid pattern.
A scanning electron micrograph of a silica inverse opal, showing a cross section of the engineered porous material with cavities, 500 nanometers in diameter, set in small holes, 90 nanometers in diameter.
Anni Shi

We then used computer simulations to model the underlying physics. We modeled the particle’s random jiggling motion, the electrical driving force and the fluid flow near the walls.

By combining this precise visualization with theoretical modeling, we deconstructed the overall behavior of the nanoparticles. We could quantify the effect of each individual physical process, from the jiggling to the electrical push.

A large, see-through box connected to machinery.
This high-resolution fluorescence microscope, in the advanced light microscopy core facility at the University of Colorado Boulder, obtained three-dimensional tracks of nanoparticles moving within porous materials.
Joseph Dragavon

Devices that move particles

This research could have major implications for technologies requiring precise microscopic transport. In these, the goal is fast, accurate and differential particle movement. Examples include drug delivery, which requires guiding “nanocargo” to specific tissue targets, or industrial separation, which entails purifying chemicals and filtering contaminants.

Our discovery – the ability to separately control a particle’s speed using weak fields and its direction using strong fields – acts as a two-lever control tool.

This control may allow engineers to design devices that apply weak or strong fields to move different particle types in tailored ways. Ultimately, this tool could improve faster and more efficient diagnostic tools and purification systems.

What’s next

We’ve established independent control over the particles’ searching using speed and their migration using direction. But we still don’t know the phenomenon’s full limits.

Key questions remain: What are the upper and lower sizes of particles that can be controlled in this way? Can this method be reliably applied in complex, dynamic biological environments?

Most fundamentally, we’ll need to investigate the exact mechanism behind the dramatic speedup of these particles under a weak electric field. Answering these questions is essential to unlocking the full precision of this particle control method.

Our work is part of a larger scientific push to understand how confinement and boundaries influence the motion of nanoscale objects. As technology shrinks, understanding how these particles interact with nearby surfaces will help design efficient, tiny devices. And when moving through spongy, porous materials, nanoparticles are constantly encountering surfaces and boundaries.

The collective goal of our and others’ related research is to transform the control of tiny particles from a process of trial and error into a reliable, predictable science.

The Conversation

Daniel K. Schwartz receives funding from the US Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health.

Ankur Gupta receives funding from the National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.

ref. Electric fields steered nanoparticles through a liquid-filled maze – this new method could improve drug delivery and purification systems – https://theconversation.com/electric-fields-steered-nanoparticles-through-a-liquid-filled-maze-this-new-method-could-improve-drug-delivery-and-purification-systems-268553

Blame the shutdown on citizens who prefer politicians to vanquish their opponents rather than to work for the common good

Source: The Conversation – USA – By Robert B. Talisse, W. Alton Jones Professor of Philosophy, Vanderbilt University

Who is really responsible for the longest government shutdown in history? iStock/Getty Images Plus

The United States was founded on the idea that government exists to serve its people. To do this, government must deliver services that promote the common good. When the government shuts down, it fails to meet its fundamental purpose.

While government shutdowns are not new in the U.S., most have lasted less than a week. At 40 days, the current shutdown may well be on the way to an end this week, as enough Senate Democratic caucus members have voted with Republicans on a measure to reopen the government. But it will remain the longest in the history of the nation.

When the government shuts down for such a long time, it inflicts hardships, anxieties and irritations on its citizens. You might wonder why elected officials allow lengthy disruptions to happen.

It is common to blame the politicians for the shutdown. However, as a philosopher who researches democracy, I think the fault lies also with us, the citizens. In a democracy, we generally get the politics we ask for, and the electorate has developed a taste for political spectacle over competent leadership.

American democracy has grown increasingly tribal, leading us to become more invested in punishing our partisan rivals than in demanding competent government. We are infatuated with the spectacle of our side dominating the other.

Understandably, politicians have embraced obstruction. They have learned that deadlock can pay, because they have the support of their voters in behaving this way. Politics is no longer about representation and policy, it’s now about vanquishing and even humiliating the other side.

Three women and two men on a stage with American flags flanking them, and one of them speaking at a lectern.
U.S. Sen. Maggie Hassan speaks at a press conference with other Senate Democratic caucus members who voted to restore government funding, in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 9, 2025.
Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images

More fervent, not better informed

To see this, we must examine polarization. Let’s start by distinguishing two kinds of polarization.

First is political polarization. It measures the divide between the U.S.’s two major parties. When political polarization is severe, the common ground among the parties falls away. This naturally undermines cooperation. That Republicans and Democrats are politically polarized is certainly part of the explanation for the shutdown.

But that’s not the entire story. As I argue in my book “Civic Solitude,” the deeper trouble has to do with belief polarization.

Unlike political polarization, which measures the distance between opposing groups, belief polarization occurs within a single group. In belief polarization, like-minded people transform into more extreme version of themselves: Liberals become more liberal, conservatives become more conservative, Second Amendment advocates become more pro-gun, environmentalists become more green, and so on.

Importantly, this shift is driven by the desire to fit in with one’s peers, not by evidence or reason. Hence, we become more fervent but no better informed.

Additionally, our more extreme selves are also more tribal and conformist. As we shift, we become more antagonistic toward outsiders. We also become more insistent on uniformity within our group, less tolerant of differences.

Animosity and obstruction

The combination of intensifying antagonism toward those on the “other side” and escalating cohesion among those on “your side” turns all aspects of life into politics.

In the U.S. today, liberals and conservatives are heavily socially segregated. They live in different neighborhoods, work in different professions, vacation in different locations, drive different vehicles and shop in different stores. Everyday behavior has become an extension of partisan affiliation.

Ironically, as everyday life becomes politically saturated, politics itself becomes more about lifestyle and less about policy. Research suggests that while animosity across the parties has intensified significantly, citizens’ disagreements over policy have either remained stable or eased. We dislike one another more intensely yet are not more divided.

This paints a grim portrait of U.S. democracy. Note that this condition incentivizes politicians to amplify their contempt for political rivals. Politicians seek to win elections, and stoking negative feelings such as fear and indignation are potent triggers of political behavior, including voting.

Consequently, when citizens are belief polarized, animosity and obstruction become winning electoral strategies. Meanwhile, politicians are released from the task of serving the common good.

A group of people standing behind a man who's standing at a lectern, behind a sign that says 'The DEMOCRAT SHUTDOWN.'
U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during a news conference with House Republican leadership at the U.S. Capitol on Nov. 6, 2025.
Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Channeling contempt

It is no surprise that discussions of the shutdown have consistently focused on blame.

The Republicans, who hold the congressional majority, have sought to score points by depicting the shutdown as the Democrats’ fault. Several official websites maintained by the federal government included statements denouncing the shutdown as strictly the doing of the Democrats. Their aim has been to channel citizens’ frustration into contempt for the Democratic Party.

At the beginning of the shutdown, House Speaker Mike Johnson claimed that there was “literally nothing to negotiate” with congressional Democrats.

But there’s the rub. Democratic government is fundamentally a matter of negotiation. Neither winning an election nor being a member of the majority party means that you can simply call the shots. The constitutional procedures by which our representatives govern are designed to force cooperation, collaboration and compromise.

Thanks to polarization, however, these noble ideals of political give-and-take have dissolved. Cooperation is now seen as surrender to political enemies. That’s very clear in many Democrats’ outraged reactions to the eight senators from their caucus who have now voted with Republicans to end the shutdown.

Meanwhile, more than 1 million government employees haven’t been paid, many crucial government services have been interrupted, diminished or suspended, and, with the Thanksgiving holiday approaching, travelers are experiencing flight disruptions. While there may be an end to the shutdown on the near horizon, any deal could simply postpone crucial policy debates and could well end in another shutdown in the new year.

The key to avoiding this kind of failure is to become a citizenry that demands competent government over partisan domination.

The Conversation

Robert B. Talisse does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

ref. Blame the shutdown on citizens who prefer politicians to vanquish their opponents rather than to work for the common good – https://theconversation.com/blame-the-shutdown-on-citizens-who-prefer-politicians-to-vanquish-their-opponents-rather-than-to-work-for-the-common-good-269041

Nine to Noon exclusive: Israeli hostage describes his near 500-day ordeal, and why he doesn’t hate his captors

Source: Radio New Zealand

Eli Sharabi was taken hostage by Hamas on October 7 , 2023 and held captive for 491 days.

Eli Sharabi was taken hostage by Hamas on October 7 , 2023 and held captive for 491 days. Photo: Blake Ezra

On October 7th 2023, Eli Sharabi was kidnapped by Hamas and held for 491 days.

He and his wife and two daughters were in their home on a kibbutz in Southern Israel when the attack happened.

His next 14 months were spent mostly in tunnels under Gaza – with often cruel, but occasionally kind captors, little food, no sunlight – and most importantly no knowledge that his British wife and teenage daughters had been killed the day he was taken.

It was only after his release in February that he learned that terrible news, and that his brother had also died captive in Gaza.

Sharabi said it was a “devastating moment” when they weren’t there to greet him.

Despite his horrendous ordeal, Eli Sharabi regards himself as lucky and says he does not hate his captors.

“Even when they humiliate me, even they violate … against me from time to time you understand it’s necessary to have this relationship with them if you want to go back to your family.”

He is the first released Israeli hostage to write a book about his experience.

Sharabi shares his story with Nine to Noon’s Kathryn Ryan. Listen live at the top of this page, on the RNZ app or your local RNZ frequency.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Louvre ‘fedora man’ revealed: Meet the stylish teen dresser snapped at scene of heist

Source: Radio New Zealand

As all eyes turned to the Louvre after the shocking theft of the French crown jewels, one especially stylish figure on the museum grounds caught the internet’s attention: a sharply dressed young man, wearing a three-piece suit and a fedora tilted just so.

As speculation swirled about the identity of the so-called “French detective” pictured at the scene, 15-year-old Pedro Elias Garzon Delvaux, who featured in the photo, was enjoying his new double life.

The teenager met CNN at his home in Rambouillet, about 30 miles southwest of the French capital, to discuss the social media furor.

Video poster frame

This video is hosted on Youtube.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand

Listen live: Israeli hostage describes 14 months of captivity in Gaza

Source: Radio New Zealand

Eli Sharabi was taken hostage by Hamas on October 7 , 2023 and held captive for 491 days.

Eli Sharabi was taken hostage by Hamas on October 7 , 2023 and held captive for 491 days. Photo: Blake Ezra

On October 7th 2023, Eli Sharabi was kidnapped by Hamas and held for 491 days.

He and his wife and two daughters were in their home on a kibbutz in Southern Israel when the attack happened.

His next 14 months were spent mostly in tunnels under Gaza – with often cruel, but occasionally kind captors, little food, no sunlight – and most importantly no knowledge that his British wife and teenage daughters had been killed the day he was taken.

It was only after his release in February that he learned that terrible news, and that his brother had also died captive in Gaza.

Sharabi said it was a “devastating moment” when they weren’t there to greet him.

Despite his horrendous ordeal, Eli Sharabi regards himself as lucky and says he does not hate his captors.

“Even when they humiliate me, even they violate … against me from time to time you understand it’s necessary to have this relationship with them if you want to go back to your family.”

He is the first released Israeli hostage to write a book about his experience.

Sharabi shares his story with Nine to Noon’s Kathryn Ryan. Listen live at the top of this page, on the RNZ app or your local RNZ frequency.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand